{"title":"Comparative analysis of the library classification system between Al-Almawi and Dewey","authors":"Khairul Nizam bin Zainal Badri","doi":"10.30829/iqra.v17i1.11866","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study involves a comparative analysis between the library management system developed by Melvil Dewey in 1876 and Abd Al-Basit bin Musa Al-Almawi (1502-1573 AD) better known as Al-Almawi who lived in the heyday of the Ottoman Dynasty in the 16th century. The library management system developed by Dewey can be considered dominant at the moment as it is widely used around the world. However, this system is said to have posed some difficulties in terms of maintenance as its field categories have been restricted and field overlap as there are several fields have been grouped in one class. The classification number becomes longer when there are new categories thus causing the process of access and storage to be very complex. To address the problem, this study seeks to examine the system developed by Al-Almawi to see if the system is able to deal with the problem either in terms of technical and development intellectuality. The objective of the study is to find out the characteristics of the system highlighted by Al-Almawi, identify the impact of the system from axiology point of view, and the suitability of the system in the information system management industry. This study uses a fully qualitative approach where the library method is chosen to collect data and information related to the classification and cataloguing system. The data were then analysed using a structuring approach while to conclude the findings of the study, a descriptive approach was used. The results of the study found that the system developed by Al-Almawi not only overcome the problems faced by Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC) users, but also give emphasis on manners to knowledge where the materials that contain knowledge should be glorified and arranged in scientific order, where the material with the most truth values will be placed to a higher position. The measure of truth is based on the source of revelation contained therein. Thus, it can be said that significantly, the system developed by Al-Almawi not only pleases work that requires physical nature and planning; but also, soul-blissful and double-oriented because every activity is connected directly to God. The relationship is formed due to the existence of the unity of mind and deed, which is always in the mould of the framework of Tawhid.","PeriodicalId":259773,"journal":{"name":"IQRA` Jurnal Ilmu Perpustakaan dan Informasi (e-Journal)","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IQRA` Jurnal Ilmu Perpustakaan dan Informasi (e-Journal)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30829/iqra.v17i1.11866","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study involves a comparative analysis between the library management system developed by Melvil Dewey in 1876 and Abd Al-Basit bin Musa Al-Almawi (1502-1573 AD) better known as Al-Almawi who lived in the heyday of the Ottoman Dynasty in the 16th century. The library management system developed by Dewey can be considered dominant at the moment as it is widely used around the world. However, this system is said to have posed some difficulties in terms of maintenance as its field categories have been restricted and field overlap as there are several fields have been grouped in one class. The classification number becomes longer when there are new categories thus causing the process of access and storage to be very complex. To address the problem, this study seeks to examine the system developed by Al-Almawi to see if the system is able to deal with the problem either in terms of technical and development intellectuality. The objective of the study is to find out the characteristics of the system highlighted by Al-Almawi, identify the impact of the system from axiology point of view, and the suitability of the system in the information system management industry. This study uses a fully qualitative approach where the library method is chosen to collect data and information related to the classification and cataloguing system. The data were then analysed using a structuring approach while to conclude the findings of the study, a descriptive approach was used. The results of the study found that the system developed by Al-Almawi not only overcome the problems faced by Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC) users, but also give emphasis on manners to knowledge where the materials that contain knowledge should be glorified and arranged in scientific order, where the material with the most truth values will be placed to a higher position. The measure of truth is based on the source of revelation contained therein. Thus, it can be said that significantly, the system developed by Al-Almawi not only pleases work that requires physical nature and planning; but also, soul-blissful and double-oriented because every activity is connected directly to God. The relationship is formed due to the existence of the unity of mind and deed, which is always in the mould of the framework of Tawhid.
本研究将Melvil Dewey于1876年开发的图书馆管理系统与16世纪奥斯曼王朝鼎盛时期的Abd Al-Basit bin Musa Al-Almawi(公元1502-1573年)进行比较分析。杜威开发的图书馆管理系统在世界范围内得到了广泛的应用,可以说是目前的主导系统。但是,据说这一系统在维护方面造成了一些困难,因为它的字段类别受到限制,并且字段重叠,因为有几个字段被归为一类。当有新的分类时,分类号会变长,从而导致访问和存储过程非常复杂。为了解决这个问题,本研究试图检查Al-Almawi开发的系统,看看该系统是否能够在技术和开发智力方面处理这个问题。研究的目的是找出Al-Almawi所强调的系统的特点,从价值论的角度确定系统的影响,以及系统在信息系统管理行业的适用性。本研究采用完全定性的方法,选择图书馆方法收集与分类编目系统相关的数据和信息。然后使用结构化方法对数据进行分析,同时使用描述性方法对研究结果进行总结。研究结果发现,Al-Almawi开发的系统不仅克服了杜威十进分类法(Dewey Decimal Classification, DDC)用户所面临的问题,而且强调了对知识的态度,将包含知识的材料美化并按科学的顺序排列,将最有真值的材料放在更高的位置。对真理的衡量是基于其中包含的启示的来源。因此,可以说,Al-Almawi开发的系统不仅满足了需要物理性质和计划的工作;而且,灵魂的幸福和双重导向,因为每一个活动都直接与上帝相连。这种关系是由于心行合一的存在而形成的,这始终是在塔希德框架的模子里。