Determining Context Factors for Hybrid Development Methods with Trained Models

J. Klünder, Dzejlana Karajic, Paolo Tell, Oliver Karras, C. Münkel, Jürgen Münch, Stephen G. MacDonell, R. Hebig, M. Kuhrmann
{"title":"Determining Context Factors for Hybrid Development Methods with Trained Models","authors":"J. Klünder, Dzejlana Karajic, Paolo Tell, Oliver Karras, C. Münkel, Jürgen Münch, Stephen G. MacDonell, R. Hebig, M. Kuhrmann","doi":"10.1145/3379177.3388898","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Selecting a suitable development method for a specific project context is one of the most challenging activities in process design. Every project is unique and, thus, many context factors have to be considered. Recent research took some initial steps towards statistically constructing hybrid development methods, yet, paid little attention to the peculiarities of context factors influencing method and practice selection. In this paper, we utilize exploratory factor analysis and logistic regression analysis to learn such context factors and to identify methods that are correlated with these factors. Our analysis is based on 829 data points from the HELENA dataset. We provide five base clusters of methods consisting of up to 10 methods that lay the foundation for devising hybrid development methods. The analysis of the five clusters using trained models reveals only a few context factors, e.g., project/product size and target application domain, that seem to significantly influence the selection of methods. An extended descriptive analysis of these practices in the context of the identified method clusters also suggests a consolidation of the relevant practice sets used in specific project contexts.","PeriodicalId":299473,"journal":{"name":"2020 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Software and System Processes (ICSSP)","volume":"156 12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"16","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Software and System Processes (ICSSP)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3379177.3388898","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16

Abstract

Selecting a suitable development method for a specific project context is one of the most challenging activities in process design. Every project is unique and, thus, many context factors have to be considered. Recent research took some initial steps towards statistically constructing hybrid development methods, yet, paid little attention to the peculiarities of context factors influencing method and practice selection. In this paper, we utilize exploratory factor analysis and logistic regression analysis to learn such context factors and to identify methods that are correlated with these factors. Our analysis is based on 829 data points from the HELENA dataset. We provide five base clusters of methods consisting of up to 10 methods that lay the foundation for devising hybrid development methods. The analysis of the five clusters using trained models reveals only a few context factors, e.g., project/product size and target application domain, that seem to significantly influence the selection of methods. An extended descriptive analysis of these practices in the context of the identified method clusters also suggests a consolidation of the relevant practice sets used in specific project contexts.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用训练模型确定混合开发方法的环境因素
为特定的项目环境选择合适的开发方法是过程设计中最具挑战性的活动之一。每个项目都是独特的,因此必须考虑许多环境因素。最近的研究在统计构建混合发展方法方面迈出了一些初步的步伐,但很少关注影响方法和实践选择的背景因素的特殊性。在本文中,我们利用探索性因素分析和逻辑回归分析来了解这些背景因素,并确定与这些因素相关的方法。我们的分析基于HELENA数据集的829个数据点。我们提供了由多达10种方法组成的五个基本方法集群,为设计混合开发方法奠定了基础。使用经过训练的模型对五个集群进行的分析只揭示了几个上下文因素,例如,项目/产品规模和目标应用领域,这些因素似乎对方法的选择有重大影响。在确定的方法集群的背景下对这些实践进行扩展的描述性分析也建议在特定项目背景下整合使用的相关实践集。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
EcoKnow: Engineering Effective, Co-created and Compliant Adaptive Case Management Systems for Knowledge Workers Digital Re-imagination of Software and Systems Processes for Quality Engineering: iSPIN Approach Developing ML/DL Models: A Design Framework How are Hybrid Development Approaches Organized? - A Systematic Literature Review Constructing a Hybrid Software Process Simulation Model in Practice: An Exemplar from Industry
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1