A comparison between two leadership models for security checkpoints

Wetter Olive Emil, Laube René, Hofer Franziska
{"title":"A comparison between two leadership models for security checkpoints","authors":"Wetter Olive Emil, Laube René, Hofer Franziska","doi":"10.1109/CCST.2009.5335563","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The impact of leadership structure and behavior on team or crew performance is well known and has been demonstrated in various studies (see e.g. Guzzo & Dickson, 1996; Zaccaro, Rittmann, & Marks, 2001). However, as far as we know, there is no empirical study available on leadership structures and crew performance in the applied setting of airport security control. This study compares the structure and impact of two different leadership models for security control. The first (older) model consists of one supervisor per sector. In the supervisor's sector, there are three to eight crews at work, each consisting of five security officers (SOs). Each crew independently manages and operates one line of the checkpoint. One of the five SOs in a crew is the crew leader (CL), who works together with the crew as a normal crew member but has a few additional tasks to fulfill. The second (newer) model, which focuses more on integrated crew resource management (CRM) criteria, consists of one supervisor, assisted by two CLs per sector. Together, they form a cohesive leading team. The CLs do not work in the crews anymore but manage two to three lines from behind. The crews still consist of five SOs. It is the new CLs' task to quickly isolate and manage problematic cases so that those do not block the line anymore. Like this, the workload of each team member is reduced. Another task is to keep an eye on the working quality and to communicate with the crews in such a way that working quality is enhanced. The impact of this reinforced leadership on indicators of working quality such as compliance with rules and regulations, as well as its impact on passenger flow (throughput) are analyzed using different statistical procedures such as T-tests, U-tests and Chi-square tests. Moreover, the job models of the new leadership structure are presented in detail and SOs' ratings of their acceptance and liking of both systems are presented. In sum, this study offers another, different approach to the human factors perspective in airport security focusing on leadership structures, crew resource management, and their effects.","PeriodicalId":117285,"journal":{"name":"43rd Annual 2009 International Carnahan Conference on Security Technology","volume":"34 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"43rd Annual 2009 International Carnahan Conference on Security Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CCST.2009.5335563","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

The impact of leadership structure and behavior on team or crew performance is well known and has been demonstrated in various studies (see e.g. Guzzo & Dickson, 1996; Zaccaro, Rittmann, & Marks, 2001). However, as far as we know, there is no empirical study available on leadership structures and crew performance in the applied setting of airport security control. This study compares the structure and impact of two different leadership models for security control. The first (older) model consists of one supervisor per sector. In the supervisor's sector, there are three to eight crews at work, each consisting of five security officers (SOs). Each crew independently manages and operates one line of the checkpoint. One of the five SOs in a crew is the crew leader (CL), who works together with the crew as a normal crew member but has a few additional tasks to fulfill. The second (newer) model, which focuses more on integrated crew resource management (CRM) criteria, consists of one supervisor, assisted by two CLs per sector. Together, they form a cohesive leading team. The CLs do not work in the crews anymore but manage two to three lines from behind. The crews still consist of five SOs. It is the new CLs' task to quickly isolate and manage problematic cases so that those do not block the line anymore. Like this, the workload of each team member is reduced. Another task is to keep an eye on the working quality and to communicate with the crews in such a way that working quality is enhanced. The impact of this reinforced leadership on indicators of working quality such as compliance with rules and regulations, as well as its impact on passenger flow (throughput) are analyzed using different statistical procedures such as T-tests, U-tests and Chi-square tests. Moreover, the job models of the new leadership structure are presented in detail and SOs' ratings of their acceptance and liking of both systems are presented. In sum, this study offers another, different approach to the human factors perspective in airport security focusing on leadership structures, crew resource management, and their effects.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
安全检查点的两种领导模型的比较
领导结构和行为对团队或机组人员绩效的影响是众所周知的,并已在各种研究中得到证明(例如Guzzo & Dickson, 1996;Zaccaro, Rittmann, & Marks, 2001)。然而,据我们所知,在机场安全管制的应用设置中,还没有关于领导结构和机组绩效的实证研究。本研究比较了两种不同的安全控制领导模型的结构和影响。第一种(较旧的)模式由每个部门一名监管者组成。在主管部门,有三到八个工作小组,每个小组由五名保安人员组成。每个机组独立管理和操作检查站的一条线。艇长(CL)是艇员中的五个so之一,他作为一名普通艇员与艇员一起工作,但有一些额外的任务要完成。第二种(较新的)模式,更侧重于综合乘员资源管理(CRM)标准,由一名主管组成,每个航段由两个CLs辅助。他们一起组成了一个有凝聚力的领导团队。CLs不再在机组中工作,而是从后面管理两到三条线。机组人员仍然由5名so组成。新的CLs的任务是快速隔离和管理有问题的案例,以便这些案例不再阻塞线路。这样,每个团队成员的工作量都减少了。另一项任务是监督工作质量,并与工作人员进行沟通,以提高工作质量。通过t检验、u检验和卡方检验等不同的统计程序,分析了这种加强的领导对工作质量指标(如遵守规章制度)的影响,以及对客流(吞吐量)的影响。此外,还详细介绍了新领导结构的工作模式,并给出了SOs对两种制度的接受度和喜欢度的评分。总而言之,本研究提供了另一种不同的方法来看待机场安全中的人为因素视角,重点关注领导结构、机组资源管理及其影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Use of threat image projection (TIP) to enhance security performance Robustness against misuse - a new attribute of technical systems Face Identification based on TV videos Combining hand biometric traits for personal identification Evaluation methodology for analyzing usability factors in biometrics
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1