The Principle of Proportionality in International Law: Foundations and Variations

T. Cottier, R. Echandi, Rachel Liechti-McKee, Tetyana Payosova, C. Sieber
{"title":"The Principle of Proportionality in International Law: Foundations and Variations","authors":"T. Cottier, R. Echandi, Rachel Liechti-McKee, Tetyana Payosova, C. Sieber","doi":"10.1163/22119000-12340054","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Originally based upon the principle of equity, proportionality is predominantly used in the field of human rights protection, the use of force and countermeasures, humanitarian law, maritime boundary law, trade law and investment protection. The article finds that components of proportionality are shared and variably applied in these areas. The main challenge relates to weighing and balancing of interests in judicial review, reflecting upon the varied status and authority of international tribunals. The article submits that proportionality or necessity in terms of assessing the relationship of means and end, seeking least intrusive measures, is well-established and qualifies as a self-standing rule of customary international law. It should be termed strict proportionality. However, The Principle of Proportionality in International Law 629 Journal of World Investment & Trade 18 (2017) 628–672 the component of weighing and balancing interests amounts to a general principle of law and applies in context. It informs the interpretation of the law at hand and is subject to varying standards of review.","PeriodicalId":163787,"journal":{"name":"The journal of world investment and trade","volume":"40 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The journal of world investment and trade","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/22119000-12340054","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Originally based upon the principle of equity, proportionality is predominantly used in the field of human rights protection, the use of force and countermeasures, humanitarian law, maritime boundary law, trade law and investment protection. The article finds that components of proportionality are shared and variably applied in these areas. The main challenge relates to weighing and balancing of interests in judicial review, reflecting upon the varied status and authority of international tribunals. The article submits that proportionality or necessity in terms of assessing the relationship of means and end, seeking least intrusive measures, is well-established and qualifies as a self-standing rule of customary international law. It should be termed strict proportionality. However, The Principle of Proportionality in International Law 629 Journal of World Investment & Trade 18 (2017) 628–672 the component of weighing and balancing interests amounts to a general principle of law and applies in context. It informs the interpretation of the law at hand and is subject to varying standards of review.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
国际法中的比例原则:基础与变迁
比例原则最初以公平原则为基础,主要用于人权保护、使用武力和反制措施、人道主义法、海洋边界法、贸易法和投资保护等领域。文章发现,在这些领域中,比例成分是共享的,并有不同的应用。主要的挑战是考虑到国际法庭的不同地位和权威,在司法审查中权衡和平衡利益。该条认为,在评估手段和目的的关系、寻求最少侵入性措施方面的相称性或必要性是公认的,并有资格作为习惯国际法的一项独立规则。它应该被称为严格的相称性。然而,国际法中的比例原则629《世界投资与贸易杂志》18(2017)628-672,权衡和平衡利益构成了一项一般的法律原则,并适用于具体情况。它为对现有法律的解释提供信息,并受到不同标准的审查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Quantum (In)Justice: Rethinking the Calculation of Compensation and Damages in ISDS The Mexican Front-of-Pack Labeling Reform: Is It Compatible with International Trade Law? Eiser v Spain – Unprecedented Annulment of an ICSID Award for Improper Constitution of the Tribunal Procedural Issues in International Investment Arbitration, written by Jeffery Commission and Rahim Moloo The Judicialisation of the Social License to Operate: Criteria for International Investment Law
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1