Chronic Airway Disease Patients’ Challenges During a Virtual Study: Insights from Participants & Researchers

N. Tregobov, A. McMillan, Y. S. Chae, M. Mahjoob, B. Poureslami, J. Block, I. Poureslami, J. FitzGerald
{"title":"Chronic Airway Disease Patients’ Challenges During a Virtual Study: Insights from Participants & Researchers","authors":"N. Tregobov, A. McMillan, Y. S. Chae, M. Mahjoob, B. Poureslami, J. Block, I. Poureslami, J. FitzGerald","doi":"10.1164/ajrccm-conference.2021.203.1_meetingabstracts.a1720","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Rationale: The COVID-19 pandemic has decreased the feasibility of in-person research. Despite this, widespread technological accessibility and ease-of-use make virtual research a viable alternative. Studies conducted virtually offer researchers and participants flexibility, convenience, and geographic accessibility. However, there are inherent challenges that may influence the research process, particularly for participants. This study examines patients' challenges with participating in a virtual research interview from the perspectives of researchers and patients. Methods: We conducted an exploratory community-based sub-study during a concurrent study to validate a function-based health literacy measurement tool (questionnaire) with chronic airway disease patients. Participants received and accessed study materials virtually and responded to the questionnaire over-the-phone;some participants were re-tested for questionnaire reproducibility. Initially, participants and researchers independently responded to 6 open-ended questions post-interview regarding challenges experienced during the study. Responses informed the development of a comprehensive, 18-question checklist addressing participant challenges. In subsequent interviews, research assistants administered the checklist, capturing quantitative data and verbatim quotes. Researchers' observation notes, recorded during each interview, and team teleconference notes were reviewed to provide researchers' perspectives on participant challenges. Thematic analysis of qualitative data was conducted using NVivo (QSR International, Version 12). Challenges were coded inductively and quantified on the basis of whether a researcher or patient had indicated a patient challenge, and cross-referenced with detailed observation notes. Quantitative analyses were conducted using R (R Core Team, 2019). Results: Initial interviews (n=185) and re-tests (n=110) were analysed. Quantified challenges were compared across self-reported gender, condition (asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) & asthma-COPD overlap (ACO)), education level, first language, age, ethnicity, disease duration, and previous disease-specific education. In 76% of interviews, participants experienced one or more challenges;31 unique challenges were identified. As an example, Table 1 contains the top 5 problems experienced by participants, across disease and self-reported gender, during initial interviews recorded using the open-ended question set. Qualitative analysis revealed that participants primarily experienced challenges with technology, communication (verbal & online), and instruction clarity (e.g., when/how to use study materials). Conclusions: Participants experienced a variety of challenges throughout the virtual study. Considering potential friction points for participants and possible solutions prior to starting the study by involving researchers, key informants, and participants can enhance the study process. Developing simple, informative study materials and instructions may help to mitigate challenges inherent to virtual research and facilitate a seamless, participant-friendly study experience given the unfamiliarity of this research format. .","PeriodicalId":159700,"journal":{"name":"TP20. TP020 TELEHEALTH AND REMOTE MONITORING FOR PULMONARY, CRITICAL CARE, AND SLEEP","volume":"2004 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"TP20. TP020 TELEHEALTH AND REMOTE MONITORING FOR PULMONARY, CRITICAL CARE, AND SLEEP","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1164/ajrccm-conference.2021.203.1_meetingabstracts.a1720","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rationale: The COVID-19 pandemic has decreased the feasibility of in-person research. Despite this, widespread technological accessibility and ease-of-use make virtual research a viable alternative. Studies conducted virtually offer researchers and participants flexibility, convenience, and geographic accessibility. However, there are inherent challenges that may influence the research process, particularly for participants. This study examines patients' challenges with participating in a virtual research interview from the perspectives of researchers and patients. Methods: We conducted an exploratory community-based sub-study during a concurrent study to validate a function-based health literacy measurement tool (questionnaire) with chronic airway disease patients. Participants received and accessed study materials virtually and responded to the questionnaire over-the-phone;some participants were re-tested for questionnaire reproducibility. Initially, participants and researchers independently responded to 6 open-ended questions post-interview regarding challenges experienced during the study. Responses informed the development of a comprehensive, 18-question checklist addressing participant challenges. In subsequent interviews, research assistants administered the checklist, capturing quantitative data and verbatim quotes. Researchers' observation notes, recorded during each interview, and team teleconference notes were reviewed to provide researchers' perspectives on participant challenges. Thematic analysis of qualitative data was conducted using NVivo (QSR International, Version 12). Challenges were coded inductively and quantified on the basis of whether a researcher or patient had indicated a patient challenge, and cross-referenced with detailed observation notes. Quantitative analyses were conducted using R (R Core Team, 2019). Results: Initial interviews (n=185) and re-tests (n=110) were analysed. Quantified challenges were compared across self-reported gender, condition (asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) & asthma-COPD overlap (ACO)), education level, first language, age, ethnicity, disease duration, and previous disease-specific education. In 76% of interviews, participants experienced one or more challenges;31 unique challenges were identified. As an example, Table 1 contains the top 5 problems experienced by participants, across disease and self-reported gender, during initial interviews recorded using the open-ended question set. Qualitative analysis revealed that participants primarily experienced challenges with technology, communication (verbal & online), and instruction clarity (e.g., when/how to use study materials). Conclusions: Participants experienced a variety of challenges throughout the virtual study. Considering potential friction points for participants and possible solutions prior to starting the study by involving researchers, key informants, and participants can enhance the study process. Developing simple, informative study materials and instructions may help to mitigate challenges inherent to virtual research and facilitate a seamless, participant-friendly study experience given the unfamiliarity of this research format. .
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
慢性气道疾病患者在虚拟研究中的挑战:来自参与者和研究人员的见解
理由:新冠肺炎大流行降低了面对面研究的可行性。尽管如此,广泛的技术可及性和易用性使虚拟研究成为一种可行的选择。虚拟研究为研究人员和参与者提供了灵活性、便利性和地理可达性。然而,有一些固有的挑战可能会影响研究过程,特别是对参与者而言。本研究从研究人员和患者的角度考察了患者参与虚拟研究访谈的挑战。方法:我们在一项并行研究中进行了一项探索性社区子研究,以验证基于功能的健康素养测量工具(问卷)对慢性气道疾病患者的影响。参与者通过虚拟方式接收和访问学习材料,并通过电话回答问卷;一些参与者重新测试问卷的可重复性。最初,参与者和研究人员在采访后分别回答了6个关于研究过程中遇到的挑战的开放式问题。这些回答为制定一份全面的18个问题清单提供了信息,以解决参与者面临的挑战。在随后的访谈中,研究助理管理清单,获取定量数据和逐字引用。研究人员在每次访谈中记录的观察笔记和团队电话会议记录进行了回顾,以提供研究人员对参与者挑战的看法。使用NVivo (QSR International, Version 12)对定性数据进行专题分析。根据研究人员或患者是否表示患者挑战,对挑战进行归纳编码和量化,并与详细的观察笔记进行交叉参考。使用R进行定量分析(R Core Team, 2019)。结果:对初次访谈(n=185)和复查(n=110)进行分析。量化挑战在自我报告的性别、病情(哮喘、慢性阻塞性肺病(COPD)和哮喘-COPD重叠(ACO))、教育水平、第一语言、年龄、种族、疾病持续时间和以前的疾病特异性教育程度之间进行比较。在76%的访谈中,参与者经历了一个或多个挑战;确定了31个独特的挑战。作为一个例子,表1包含了在使用开放式问题集记录的初始访谈中,参与者在疾病和自我报告的性别方面遇到的前5个问题。定性分析显示,参与者主要经历了技术、沟通(口头和在线)和教学清晰度(例如,何时/如何使用学习材料)方面的挑战。结论:参与者在整个虚拟研究中经历了各种各样的挑战。在开始研究之前,考虑参与者的潜在摩擦点和可能的解决方案,让研究人员、关键信息提供者和参与者参与进来,可以增强研究过程。开发简单、信息丰富的学习材料和指导可能有助于减轻虚拟研究固有的挑战,并促进无缝的、参与者友好的学习体验,因为这种研究形式不熟悉。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
"It's Not that Intuitive for Somebody Who Doesn't Do This All Day Every Day:" A Qualitative Study of VA Specialists' and Primary Care Providers' Perspectives Regarding E-Consult Requests Effect of Telehealth Interventions on Improving Quality of Life in High Risk VA Patients Patient Satisfaction with Telemedicine in a Virtual Lung Transplant Clinic Providing Social Support for Adults with Cystic Fibrosis During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Pilot Study of a Web-Based Support Group Patient-Reported Symptom Severity and Pulse Oximetry in the Covid-19 Remote Monitoring Programme in Ireland
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1