An Analysis of the Guaranteed Withdrawal Benefits for Life Option

P. Shah, D. Bertsimas
{"title":"An Analysis of the Guaranteed Withdrawal Benefits for Life Option","authors":"P. Shah, D. Bertsimas","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1312727","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, we present an analysis of the \"Guaranteed Withdrawal Benefits'' (GWB) for life option, a recent and popular product that many insurance companies are offering as a retirement planning solution. Under the GWB for life plan, the investor is promised increasing withdrawals during retirement for her lifetime, while still being invested in the markets. GWB for life thus transfers financial and longevity related risks from an individual investor to the insurance company underwriting the guarantee. We first analyze a continuous time version of this product in a Black Scholes economy with simplifying assumptions on population mortality and obtain an analytical solution for the product value. This analysis reveals the high sensitivity the product bears to several risk factors. We then price the GWB in a realistic setting using different asset pricing models, including those that allow the interest rates and the volatility of returns to be stochastic. Our analysis reveals that 1) GWB has insufficient price discrimination and is susceptible to adverse selection and 2) valuations can vary substantially depending on which class of models is used. We believe the ambiguity in value and the presence of significant risks, which can be challenging to hedge, should create concerns to the insurance companies offering the GWB, their investors and clients as well as the regulators.","PeriodicalId":315176,"journal":{"name":"Banking & Insurance","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-12-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"23","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Banking & Insurance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1312727","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 23

Abstract

In this paper, we present an analysis of the "Guaranteed Withdrawal Benefits'' (GWB) for life option, a recent and popular product that many insurance companies are offering as a retirement planning solution. Under the GWB for life plan, the investor is promised increasing withdrawals during retirement for her lifetime, while still being invested in the markets. GWB for life thus transfers financial and longevity related risks from an individual investor to the insurance company underwriting the guarantee. We first analyze a continuous time version of this product in a Black Scholes economy with simplifying assumptions on population mortality and obtain an analytical solution for the product value. This analysis reveals the high sensitivity the product bears to several risk factors. We then price the GWB in a realistic setting using different asset pricing models, including those that allow the interest rates and the volatility of returns to be stochastic. Our analysis reveals that 1) GWB has insufficient price discrimination and is susceptible to adverse selection and 2) valuations can vary substantially depending on which class of models is used. We believe the ambiguity in value and the presence of significant risks, which can be challenging to hedge, should create concerns to the insurance companies offering the GWB, their investors and clients as well as the regulators.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
终身期权保障提款收益分析
在本文中,我们对“保证提款收益”(GWB)人寿期权进行了分析,这是许多保险公司最近提供的一种流行的产品,作为退休计划的解决方案。在GWB终身计划下,投资者被承诺在退休期间增加提款,同时仍然投资于市场。因此,GWB终身寿险将财务和长寿相关风险从个人投资者转移到承保该担保的保险公司。我们首先分析了布莱克斯科尔斯经济中该产品的连续时间版本,简化了对人口死亡率的假设,并获得了产品价值的解析解。这一分析揭示了该产品对几个风险因素的高敏感性。然后,我们使用不同的资产定价模型,包括那些允许利率和收益波动是随机的模型,在现实环境中为GWB定价。我们的分析表明,1)GWB没有足够的价格歧视,容易受到逆向选择的影响;2)估值可能会根据所使用的模型类别而有很大差异。我们认为,价值的模糊性和重大风险的存在(可能难以对冲)应该引起提供GWB的保险公司、它们的投资者和客户以及监管机构的关注。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Mandatory IFRS Adoption and Institutional Investment Decisions The Impact of Joint Participation on Liquidity in Equity and Syndicated Bank Loan Markets Monotone Approximation of Decision Problems The Impact of Management and Board Ownership on Profitability in Banks with Different Strategy Banking Market Concentration and Consumer Credit Constraints: Evidence from the 1983 Survey of Consumer Finances
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1