Artificial Intelligence in aviation decision making process.The transition from extended Minimum Crew Operations to Single Pilot Operations (SiPO)

Dimitrios Ziakkas, Anastasios Plioutsias, K. Pechlivanis
{"title":"Artificial Intelligence in aviation decision making process.The transition from extended Minimum Crew Operations to Single Pilot Operations (SiPO)","authors":"Dimitrios Ziakkas, Anastasios Plioutsias, K. Pechlivanis","doi":"10.54941/ahfe1001452","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Innovation, management of change, and human factors implementation in-flight operations portray the aviation industry. The International Air Transportation Authority (IATA) Technology Roadmap (IATA, 2019) and European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) Artificial Intelligence (A.I.) roadmap propose an outline and assessment of ongoing technology prospects, which change the aviation environment with the implementation of A.I. and introduction of extended Minimum Crew Operations (eMCO) and Single Pilot Operations (SiPO). Changes in the workload will affect human performance and the decision-making process. The research accepted the universally established definition in the A.I. approach of “any technology that appears to emulate the performance of a human” (EASA, 2020). A review of the existing literature on Direct Voice Inputs (DVI) applications structured A.I. aviation decision-making research themes in cockpit design and users’ perception - experience. Interviews with Subject Matter Experts (Human Factors analysts, A.I. analysts, airline managers, examiners, instructors, qualified pilots, pilots under training) and questionnaires (disseminated to a group of professional pilots and pilots under training) examined A.I. implementation in cockpit design and operations. Results were analyzed and evaluated the suitability and significant differences of e-MCO and SiPO under the decision-making aspect.Keywords: Artificial Intelligence (A.I.), Extended Minimum Crew Operations (e-MCO), Single Pilot Operations (SiPO), cockpit design, ergonomics, decision making.","PeriodicalId":405313,"journal":{"name":"Artificial Intelligence and Social Computing","volume":"81 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Artificial Intelligence and Social Computing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54941/ahfe1001452","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Innovation, management of change, and human factors implementation in-flight operations portray the aviation industry. The International Air Transportation Authority (IATA) Technology Roadmap (IATA, 2019) and European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) Artificial Intelligence (A.I.) roadmap propose an outline and assessment of ongoing technology prospects, which change the aviation environment with the implementation of A.I. and introduction of extended Minimum Crew Operations (eMCO) and Single Pilot Operations (SiPO). Changes in the workload will affect human performance and the decision-making process. The research accepted the universally established definition in the A.I. approach of “any technology that appears to emulate the performance of a human” (EASA, 2020). A review of the existing literature on Direct Voice Inputs (DVI) applications structured A.I. aviation decision-making research themes in cockpit design and users’ perception - experience. Interviews with Subject Matter Experts (Human Factors analysts, A.I. analysts, airline managers, examiners, instructors, qualified pilots, pilots under training) and questionnaires (disseminated to a group of professional pilots and pilots under training) examined A.I. implementation in cockpit design and operations. Results were analyzed and evaluated the suitability and significant differences of e-MCO and SiPO under the decision-making aspect.Keywords: Artificial Intelligence (A.I.), Extended Minimum Crew Operations (e-MCO), Single Pilot Operations (SiPO), cockpit design, ergonomics, decision making.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
航空决策过程中的人工智能。从扩展的最小机组操作到单飞行员操作(SiPO)的过渡
创新、变革管理和人为因素在飞行操作中的实施描绘了航空业。国际航空运输管理局(IATA)技术路线图(IATA, 2019)和欧洲航空安全局(EASA)人工智能(A.I.)路线图提出了正在进行的技术前景的概述和评估,这些技术前景随着人工智能的实施和引入扩展的最小机组操作(eMCO)和单飞行员操作(SiPO)而改变航空环境。工作量的变化将影响人的表现和决策过程。该研究接受了人工智能方法中普遍确立的定义,即“任何似乎模仿人类表现的技术”(EASA, 2020)。通过对直接语音输入(DVI)应用的现有文献的回顾,构建了座舱设计和用户感知体验方面的人工智能航空决策研究主题。对主题专家(人为因素分析师、人工智能分析师、航空公司经理、审核员、教官、合格飞行员、正在培训的飞行员)的采访和问卷调查(分发给一组专业飞行员和正在培训的飞行员)检查了人工智能在驾驶舱设计和操作中的应用。分析评价了e-MCO和SiPO在决策层面的适用性和显著性差异。关键词:人工智能(A.I.),扩展最小乘员操作(e-MCO),单飞行员操作(SiPO),驾驶舱设计,人体工程学,决策制定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Hepatitis predictive analysis model through deep learning using neural networks based on patient history A machine learning approach for optimizing waiting times in a hand surgery operation center Automated Decision Support for Collaborative, Interactive Classification Dynamically monitoring crowd-worker's reliability with interval-valued labels Detection of inappropriate images on smartphones based on computer vision techniques
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1