How Accurate Are Fuzzy Control Recommendations: Interval-Valued Case

J. C. García, V. Kreinovich
{"title":"How Accurate Are Fuzzy Control Recommendations: Interval-Valued Case","authors":"J. C. García, V. Kreinovich","doi":"10.54364/aaiml.2021.1102","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As a result of applying fuzzy rules, we get a fuzzy set describing possible control values. In automatic control systems, we need to defuzzify this fuzzy set, i.e., to transform it to a single control value. One of the most frequently used defuzzification techniques is centroid defuzzification. From the practical viewpoint, an important question is: how accurate is the resulting control recommendation? The more accurately we need to implement the control, the more expensive the resulting controller. The possibility to gauge the accuracy of the fuzzy control recommendation follows from the fact that, from the mathematical viewpoint, centroid defuzzification is equivalent to transforming the fuzzy set into a probability distribution and computing the mean value of control. In view of this interpretation, a natural measure of accuracy of a fuzzy control recommendation is the standard deviation of the corresponding random variable. Computing this standard deviation is straightforward for the traditional [0, 1]-based fuzzy logic, in which all experts’ degree of confidence are represented by numbers from the interval [0, 1]. In practice, however, an expert usually cannot describe his/her degree of confidence by a single number, a more appropriate way to describe his/her confidence is by allowing to mark an interval of possible degrees. In this paper, we provide an efficient algorithm for estimating the accuracy of fuzzy control recommendations under such interval-valued fuzzy uncertainty.","PeriodicalId":373878,"journal":{"name":"Adv. Artif. Intell. Mach. Learn.","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Adv. Artif. Intell. Mach. Learn.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54364/aaiml.2021.1102","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As a result of applying fuzzy rules, we get a fuzzy set describing possible control values. In automatic control systems, we need to defuzzify this fuzzy set, i.e., to transform it to a single control value. One of the most frequently used defuzzification techniques is centroid defuzzification. From the practical viewpoint, an important question is: how accurate is the resulting control recommendation? The more accurately we need to implement the control, the more expensive the resulting controller. The possibility to gauge the accuracy of the fuzzy control recommendation follows from the fact that, from the mathematical viewpoint, centroid defuzzification is equivalent to transforming the fuzzy set into a probability distribution and computing the mean value of control. In view of this interpretation, a natural measure of accuracy of a fuzzy control recommendation is the standard deviation of the corresponding random variable. Computing this standard deviation is straightforward for the traditional [0, 1]-based fuzzy logic, in which all experts’ degree of confidence are represented by numbers from the interval [0, 1]. In practice, however, an expert usually cannot describe his/her degree of confidence by a single number, a more appropriate way to describe his/her confidence is by allowing to mark an interval of possible degrees. In this paper, we provide an efficient algorithm for estimating the accuracy of fuzzy control recommendations under such interval-valued fuzzy uncertainty.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
模糊控制建议有多准确:区间值案例
由于应用模糊规则,我们得到一个描述可能控制值的模糊集。在自动控制系统中,我们需要对该模糊集进行去模糊化,即将其转化为单个控制值。最常用的去模糊化技术之一是质心去模糊化。从实际的角度来看,一个重要的问题是:得出的控制建议有多准确?我们越需要精确地实现控制,生成的控制器就越昂贵。衡量模糊控制推荐精度的可能性来自于这样一个事实,从数学的角度来看,质心去模糊化相当于将模糊集转换为概率分布并计算控制的平均值。鉴于这种解释,模糊控制推荐的准确度的自然度量是相应随机变量的标准差。对于传统的基于[0,1]的模糊逻辑,计算该标准差很简单,其中所有专家的置信度由区间[0,1]中的数字表示。然而,在实践中,专家通常不能用一个数字来描述他/她的信心程度,一个更合适的描述他/她的信心的方法是允许标记一个可能程度的间隔。本文给出了在区间值模糊不确定性下模糊控制推荐精度估计的一种有效算法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
FishRecGAN: An End to End GAN Based Network for Fisheye Rectification and Calibration Should ChatGPT and Bard Share Revenue with Their Data Providers? A New Business Model for the AI Era Structural Vibration Signal Denoising Using Stacking Ensemble of Hybrid CNN-RNN A Comparison of Methods for Neural Network Aggregation One-class Damage Detector Using Deeper Fully Convolutional Data Descriptions for Civil Application
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1