Leverage Measurement and Multinational Comparison of Listed Commercial Banks in China

Yuxin Lin, M. Cheng, Kengfung Wong, Ho Jacko Cheung
{"title":"Leverage Measurement and Multinational Comparison of Listed Commercial Banks in China","authors":"Yuxin Lin, M. Cheng, Kengfung Wong, Ho Jacko Cheung","doi":"10.18178/ijtef.2018.9.3.602","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Based on the provisions of Basel III and the Method for Leverage Management of Commercial Banks promulgated by China Banking Regulatory Commission, this study measured various risk indicators such as leverage and non-performing loan (NPL) ratio of 15 listed commercial banks in China and compared the same type of data from several foreign commercial banks after the financial crisis. According to the NPL ratio data of the banks, the NPL ratios of major commercial banks in China were on an upward trend from 2011 to 2015. The ratio of major foreign commercial banks rose significantly during the financial crisis but declined after that. By comparing the trend of non-performing loans at home and abroad, we find that the trend of non-performing loans in China is similar to the eve of the financial crisis in the United States.According to bank leverage data, the level of leverage of most domestic banks in China at this stage is still under prudential regulation, though over-leverage exists in several banks. However, due to the widespread regulatory arbitrage, some of the businesses are not reflected in the bank's external and internal assets according to the actual risks. As a result, the official data may underestimate the real leverage of the banking industry.An important factor is the rapid development of shadow banking. The macro-prudential supervision policy is in its initial stage of implementation and is expected to control the risks of commercial banks in China in the future.","PeriodicalId":381210,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Trade, Economics and Finance","volume":"49 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Trade, Economics and Finance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18178/ijtef.2018.9.3.602","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Based on the provisions of Basel III and the Method for Leverage Management of Commercial Banks promulgated by China Banking Regulatory Commission, this study measured various risk indicators such as leverage and non-performing loan (NPL) ratio of 15 listed commercial banks in China and compared the same type of data from several foreign commercial banks after the financial crisis. According to the NPL ratio data of the banks, the NPL ratios of major commercial banks in China were on an upward trend from 2011 to 2015. The ratio of major foreign commercial banks rose significantly during the financial crisis but declined after that. By comparing the trend of non-performing loans at home and abroad, we find that the trend of non-performing loans in China is similar to the eve of the financial crisis in the United States.According to bank leverage data, the level of leverage of most domestic banks in China at this stage is still under prudential regulation, though over-leverage exists in several banks. However, due to the widespread regulatory arbitrage, some of the businesses are not reflected in the bank's external and internal assets according to the actual risks. As a result, the official data may underestimate the real leverage of the banking industry.An important factor is the rapid development of shadow banking. The macro-prudential supervision policy is in its initial stage of implementation and is expected to control the risks of commercial banks in China in the future.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
中国上市商业银行杠杆计量与跨国比较
本研究以《巴塞尔协议III》的规定和银监会颁布的《商业银行杠杆管理办法》为基础,对中国15家上市商业银行的杠杆率、不良贷款率等各项风险指标进行了测量,并对金融危机后几家国外商业银行的同类数据进行了比较。银行不良贷款率数据显示,2011 - 2015年,中国主要商业银行的不良贷款率呈上升趋势。主要外资商业银行的比例在金融危机期间大幅上升,但在金融危机之后有所下降。通过对比国内外的不良贷款趋势,我们发现中国的不良贷款趋势与金融危机前夕的美国相似。从银行杠杆数据来看,现阶段中国国内大多数银行的杠杆水平仍处于审慎监管之下,尽管有几家银行存在杠杆过高的情况。然而,由于监管套利的普遍存在,部分业务并没有根据实际风险反映在银行的外部和内部资产中。因此,官方数据可能低估了银行业的实际杠杆率。一个重要的因素是影子银行的快速发展。宏观审慎监管政策正处于实施的初始阶段,有望在未来控制中国商业银行的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Integrated Lean Service-Digital Marketing Model to Increase the Profitability of Debit Cards in Retail Banking Burden of Leverage: How Leverage Affects Performance of Companies in America Relationships between Live-streaming e-Commerce and Consumers’ Purchase Intentions and Corporate Brand Marketing: A Survey Based on China An Attention Based Multi-gate Mixture-of-Experts Model for Quantitative Stock Selection Tourism Firm Performance on Economic Risk and Return in Malaysia under Climate Change Context
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1