{"title":"Shared UAV enterprise operator pooling framework (SUAVE) chance constrained pooled fan-out queueing analysis","authors":"L. Bush","doi":"10.1109/COGSIMA.2015.7107970","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The number of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) in the Air Force inventory is rapidly increasing without a concomitant increase in manpower. Military planners are currently seeking technologies that enable operators to simultaneously control a greater number of UAVs. The technology planning and recommendation process requires a systems-level engineering analysis of UAV operations and their sensitivity to various constraints. Olsen and Wood introduced a concept called fan-out, which estimates how many operators are required to effectively operate a given set of UAVs. The fan-out concept assumes that UAVs are permanently assigned to a single operator or operator team. We designed a pooled UAV-to-operator team allocation scheme, which allows sharing of operator team resources across the entire UAV fleet. Rather than permanently assigning a given UAV to an operator team, our architecture dynamically allocates operator teams to UAVs on an as-needed basis during multi-UAV operations. We constructed an architecture based on queueing theory to empirically compare pooled and non-pooled performance. Queueing systems analysis of this architecture demonstrates that it performs better than a non-teaming approach. Moreover, our architectural analysis leads to a more general definition of fanout. More importantly, the closed-form queueing analysis is highly efficient, allowing us to analyze a greater number of problem configurations. This greater command of the problem space also offers advantages in determining appropriate autonomy and teaming technologies for further development.","PeriodicalId":373467,"journal":{"name":"2015 IEEE International Multi-Disciplinary Conference on Cognitive Methods in Situation Awareness and Decision","volume":"32 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-03-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2015 IEEE International Multi-Disciplinary Conference on Cognitive Methods in Situation Awareness and Decision","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/COGSIMA.2015.7107970","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Abstract
The number of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) in the Air Force inventory is rapidly increasing without a concomitant increase in manpower. Military planners are currently seeking technologies that enable operators to simultaneously control a greater number of UAVs. The technology planning and recommendation process requires a systems-level engineering analysis of UAV operations and their sensitivity to various constraints. Olsen and Wood introduced a concept called fan-out, which estimates how many operators are required to effectively operate a given set of UAVs. The fan-out concept assumes that UAVs are permanently assigned to a single operator or operator team. We designed a pooled UAV-to-operator team allocation scheme, which allows sharing of operator team resources across the entire UAV fleet. Rather than permanently assigning a given UAV to an operator team, our architecture dynamically allocates operator teams to UAVs on an as-needed basis during multi-UAV operations. We constructed an architecture based on queueing theory to empirically compare pooled and non-pooled performance. Queueing systems analysis of this architecture demonstrates that it performs better than a non-teaming approach. Moreover, our architectural analysis leads to a more general definition of fanout. More importantly, the closed-form queueing analysis is highly efficient, allowing us to analyze a greater number of problem configurations. This greater command of the problem space also offers advantages in determining appropriate autonomy and teaming technologies for further development.