Exploring Cohesions in EFL Academic Writing: A State of the Art on the Study of Cohesions

Orvi Banja Uru, A. Sudirman, Andhi Dwi Nugroho
{"title":"Exploring Cohesions in EFL Academic Writing: A State of the Art on the Study of Cohesions","authors":"Orvi Banja Uru, A. Sudirman, Andhi Dwi Nugroho","doi":"10.31849/elsya.v3i2.6730","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Cohesion has become a crucial component of academic writing that promotes the semantic connection within phrases and sentences. The objectives of this literature review research are to identify different forms of cohesions and the most common form of cohesion in articles on EFL academic writing. This study extracted records from Google Scholar and Scopus databases and selected 20 studies in the last five years out of 700 on the use of cohesions in the writing of EFL students. The data was gathered by sorting similar messages, finding cohesions, clarifying cohesions, and counting the cohesions with the highest percentage. The research results show that the published articles containing cohesions represent the reference (35%), paired conjunctions (15%), reiteration (40%), and collocation (10%). The most common type of cohesion is reiteration, which is essential for comprehending what the authors mean in their published works. Cohesions in theoretical and practical grounds contribute to the explicitness of semantic components of words or phrases to generate the messages conveyed to readers.","PeriodicalId":284569,"journal":{"name":"Elsya : Journal of English Language Studies","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Elsya : Journal of English Language Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31849/elsya.v3i2.6730","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Cohesion has become a crucial component of academic writing that promotes the semantic connection within phrases and sentences. The objectives of this literature review research are to identify different forms of cohesions and the most common form of cohesion in articles on EFL academic writing. This study extracted records from Google Scholar and Scopus databases and selected 20 studies in the last five years out of 700 on the use of cohesions in the writing of EFL students. The data was gathered by sorting similar messages, finding cohesions, clarifying cohesions, and counting the cohesions with the highest percentage. The research results show that the published articles containing cohesions represent the reference (35%), paired conjunctions (15%), reiteration (40%), and collocation (10%). The most common type of cohesion is reiteration, which is essential for comprehending what the authors mean in their published works. Cohesions in theoretical and practical grounds contribute to the explicitness of semantic components of words or phrases to generate the messages conveyed to readers.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
英语学术写作中的衔接研究:衔接研究的最新进展
衔接已经成为学术写作的一个重要组成部分,它促进了短语和句子之间的语义联系。本文献综述研究的目的是识别英语学术写作文章中不同的衔接形式和最常见的衔接形式。本研究从Google Scholar和Scopus数据库中提取了记录,并从过去五年的700篇关于英语学生在写作中使用衔接语的研究中选择了20篇。收集数据的方法是:对相似的信息进行分类,寻找黏结,澄清黏结,并对百分比最高的黏结进行计数。研究结果表明,含衔接词的已发表文章主要表现为引用(35%)、配对连词(15%)、重申(40%)和搭配(10%)。最常见的衔接类型是重复,这对于理解作者在其出版作品中的意思至关重要。从理论和实践的角度来看,语篇衔接有助于使词或短语的语义成分更加明确,从而产生要传达给读者的信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Efficacy of Task-Based Learning and Learning Motivation on Student’s Reading Comprehension: A Wholistic Study Speaking Up: A Comprehensive Investigation of EFL Secondary Students' Speaking Skill Problems in Indonesia's Islamic School Context Professional Development Altogether: Pre-Service and In-Service EFL Teacher Collaboration in Doing Classroom Action Research The Implementation of Telegram in Reading Class to Improve Students’ Skimming and Scanning Skills Categorial Conflict between Phrasal-Prepositional Verbs and Infinitives: The Great Complement Shift
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1