Standards in Dementia Care

Manoj Kumar Singh
{"title":"Standards in Dementia Care","authors":"Manoj Kumar Singh","doi":"10.4088/PCC.v08n0212b","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"edited by Alistair Burns on behalf of the European Dementia Consensus Network (EDCON) Group. Taylor & Francis Group, New York, N.Y., 2005, 224 pages, $99.95. \n \nIn a world with a gradually aging population, dementia is a global problem that is becoming increasingly common. According to Alzheimer Disease International, there are 18 million people worldwide with dementia, of whom almost 25% live in Europe.1 The current state of dementia care in Europe is, therefore, of great interest. \n \nControversies in the evaluation and treatment of dementia in the United States have lead to an abundance of guidelines from geriatric, family medicine, neurology, and psychiatry organizations. Standards in Dementia Care is an ambitious effort from the European Dementia Consensus Network, or EDCON, to summarize and synthesize current practices and guidelines for the treatment of Alzheimer's disease across Europe. EDCON's members are drawn from the United Kingdom, the Netherlands, Switzerland, Spain, and Denmark. \n \nThis book is divided into 6 sections: an introduction, a European perspective on the practice of dementia care, multidisciplinary working, carer stress, services, and ethical/legal issues. In most chapters, perspectives from different European countries are presented. \n \nIn the introduction, titled “Standards of Care in Dementia in Europe—A Consensus,” EDCON gives 6 general recommendations for the care of patients with dementia: standardization in care; standards that are evidence-based and applicable to the different sites of care (home as opposed to a long-term care facility, for example); a partnership between patients, their care-givers, and their health care and social workers; carefully planned services; preservation of the dignity of the patient; and support of the caregiver. \n \nThe second section consists of a general review of dementia care in the 18 European countries. This is perhaps the most interesting section, as an incredible variability in services between countries is displayed. Nations that are wealthier and have socialistic health care offer more detailed and comprehensive services that are government funded. Some countries have government-sponsored research related to dementia care and a national health policy in which geriatric and dementia services are provided. Some countries have guidelines about the diagnosis of dementia, including the role of investigations such as magnetic resonance imaging. The coverage of medications for dementia is also quite variable. Coverage of expensive cholinesterase inhibitors is not universal, and in some countries such as Denmark, only a neurologist can prescribe them. Services such as day care, nursing home care, hospitalization, and respite care are often available, but inadequate funding is common. Subspecialty services are frequently limited, or even nonexistent (for example, only the United Kingdom has a well-developed “Old Age Psychiatry” service). In Germany, there is an acute shortage of geriatricians, with most of them concentrated in university settings. In Belgium, Gingko biloba is covered and there is even a law allowing euthanasia in very special circumstances. Ukraine is a country where both funding and national guidelines are at inadequate levels. Perhaps as a result of this, Ukraine has a high suicide rate among patients with dementia. \n \nThe third section, “Multidisciplinary Working,” includes 13 diverse chapters covering the issues of the different disciplines involved in the care of dementia. Some discuss how the discipline operates in the author's home country, while others discuss the value of the discipline in general. For example, in chapter 23, Dr. Alistair Burns, a member of EDCON and Professor of Old Age Psychiatry in the United Kingdom, explains the role of the old age psychiatrist, although this subspecialty is not found in most of Europe. The authors give a good overview of how primary care physicians, subspecialists, nurses, social workers, and others who care for and treat dementia patients can and should work together to improve the quality of care received by a patient with dementia. \n \nThe fourth section is about caregiver stress. It is interesting to note that in Europe, as in the United States, most caregivers are female and deal with “substantial psychological strain.” The chapters give an overview of caregiver stress, organizations that support the caregiver, and elder abuse. Each chapter summarizes the topics and gives practical recommendations. For the most part, the chapters do not excessively detail the issues or resources in any one country, but instead provide a more global perspective. \n \nThe fifth section is titled “Services,” and these 7 chapters focus on the availability of certain services in a particular country. The main offerings are memory clinics and dementia service centers. An overview of memory clinics is accompanied by recommendations on how these should be developed. The dementia service centers, on the other hand, are discussed in 2 chapters, one about services in the United Kingdom and one about services in Norway. Similarly, government perspectives on dementia care are discussed as they exist in 2 European countries, England and Germany. \n \nThe sixth and final section deals with ethical and legal issues with respect to autonomy, end of life care, mental incapacity, and hospital/nursing home settings. The content of some chapters is based on the author's research of the situation in his or her own country (e.g., the Netherlands, England). Most of these topics are reviewed in general, and practical recommendations are made. The first chapter is about autonomy and the dignity of people with dementia and discusses the recommendations of the nonprofit organization Alzheimer Europe. Another chapter is about mental incapacity in England and Wales and gives a nice review of the 2004 U.K. Mental Incapacity Bill. \n \nThe attraction of this book is that it gives the reader some idea of the current state of and future directions for dementia care in Europe. The second section has input from each of the 18 European countries involved. Although the topic of dementia care from the standpoint of epidemiology, evaluation, and treatment was covered in detail in some chapters, in others the review was minimal at best. I would have liked these authors to have used a standardized format to make it easier to compare differences in areas such as government funding, existence of a national health policy, and approved investigations in the initial evaluation of a dementia patient. \n \nIn latter chapters, some topics are discussed only from the perspective of how the issue is handled in the author's country. Although an overview of how this issue is handled differently in all 18 European countries may have been too unwieldy, after reading about dementia care centers in England and Norway one wonders if they exist and to what degree in other countries, such as Spain or Belgium. Overall, the book is well written. Several authors are involved, and although there is considerable overlap there is very little disagreement and the message is usually quite clear. There are occasional words that differ on this side of the Atlantic, such as carer for caregiver, but these are few and do not interfere with the message. \n \nThis book will be an interesting read for anyone involved in the care of patients with dementia, whether based in Europe or elsewhere or whether involved in primary or subspecialty care. As a physician working in the United States, I find it interesting to read the European perspective on the diagnosis of dementia and its treatment (both pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic). It is refreshing to see the high standards set by EDCON. It will, however, be a challenge for Europe, with its economically diverse nations, to afford the cost of the detailed and comprehensive care EDCON has recommended.","PeriodicalId":371004,"journal":{"name":"The Primary Care Companion To The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Primary Care Companion To The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4088/PCC.v08n0212b","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

edited by Alistair Burns on behalf of the European Dementia Consensus Network (EDCON) Group. Taylor & Francis Group, New York, N.Y., 2005, 224 pages, $99.95. In a world with a gradually aging population, dementia is a global problem that is becoming increasingly common. According to Alzheimer Disease International, there are 18 million people worldwide with dementia, of whom almost 25% live in Europe.1 The current state of dementia care in Europe is, therefore, of great interest. Controversies in the evaluation and treatment of dementia in the United States have lead to an abundance of guidelines from geriatric, family medicine, neurology, and psychiatry organizations. Standards in Dementia Care is an ambitious effort from the European Dementia Consensus Network, or EDCON, to summarize and synthesize current practices and guidelines for the treatment of Alzheimer's disease across Europe. EDCON's members are drawn from the United Kingdom, the Netherlands, Switzerland, Spain, and Denmark. This book is divided into 6 sections: an introduction, a European perspective on the practice of dementia care, multidisciplinary working, carer stress, services, and ethical/legal issues. In most chapters, perspectives from different European countries are presented. In the introduction, titled “Standards of Care in Dementia in Europe—A Consensus,” EDCON gives 6 general recommendations for the care of patients with dementia: standardization in care; standards that are evidence-based and applicable to the different sites of care (home as opposed to a long-term care facility, for example); a partnership between patients, their care-givers, and their health care and social workers; carefully planned services; preservation of the dignity of the patient; and support of the caregiver. The second section consists of a general review of dementia care in the 18 European countries. This is perhaps the most interesting section, as an incredible variability in services between countries is displayed. Nations that are wealthier and have socialistic health care offer more detailed and comprehensive services that are government funded. Some countries have government-sponsored research related to dementia care and a national health policy in which geriatric and dementia services are provided. Some countries have guidelines about the diagnosis of dementia, including the role of investigations such as magnetic resonance imaging. The coverage of medications for dementia is also quite variable. Coverage of expensive cholinesterase inhibitors is not universal, and in some countries such as Denmark, only a neurologist can prescribe them. Services such as day care, nursing home care, hospitalization, and respite care are often available, but inadequate funding is common. Subspecialty services are frequently limited, or even nonexistent (for example, only the United Kingdom has a well-developed “Old Age Psychiatry” service). In Germany, there is an acute shortage of geriatricians, with most of them concentrated in university settings. In Belgium, Gingko biloba is covered and there is even a law allowing euthanasia in very special circumstances. Ukraine is a country where both funding and national guidelines are at inadequate levels. Perhaps as a result of this, Ukraine has a high suicide rate among patients with dementia. The third section, “Multidisciplinary Working,” includes 13 diverse chapters covering the issues of the different disciplines involved in the care of dementia. Some discuss how the discipline operates in the author's home country, while others discuss the value of the discipline in general. For example, in chapter 23, Dr. Alistair Burns, a member of EDCON and Professor of Old Age Psychiatry in the United Kingdom, explains the role of the old age psychiatrist, although this subspecialty is not found in most of Europe. The authors give a good overview of how primary care physicians, subspecialists, nurses, social workers, and others who care for and treat dementia patients can and should work together to improve the quality of care received by a patient with dementia. The fourth section is about caregiver stress. It is interesting to note that in Europe, as in the United States, most caregivers are female and deal with “substantial psychological strain.” The chapters give an overview of caregiver stress, organizations that support the caregiver, and elder abuse. Each chapter summarizes the topics and gives practical recommendations. For the most part, the chapters do not excessively detail the issues or resources in any one country, but instead provide a more global perspective. The fifth section is titled “Services,” and these 7 chapters focus on the availability of certain services in a particular country. The main offerings are memory clinics and dementia service centers. An overview of memory clinics is accompanied by recommendations on how these should be developed. The dementia service centers, on the other hand, are discussed in 2 chapters, one about services in the United Kingdom and one about services in Norway. Similarly, government perspectives on dementia care are discussed as they exist in 2 European countries, England and Germany. The sixth and final section deals with ethical and legal issues with respect to autonomy, end of life care, mental incapacity, and hospital/nursing home settings. The content of some chapters is based on the author's research of the situation in his or her own country (e.g., the Netherlands, England). Most of these topics are reviewed in general, and practical recommendations are made. The first chapter is about autonomy and the dignity of people with dementia and discusses the recommendations of the nonprofit organization Alzheimer Europe. Another chapter is about mental incapacity in England and Wales and gives a nice review of the 2004 U.K. Mental Incapacity Bill. The attraction of this book is that it gives the reader some idea of the current state of and future directions for dementia care in Europe. The second section has input from each of the 18 European countries involved. Although the topic of dementia care from the standpoint of epidemiology, evaluation, and treatment was covered in detail in some chapters, in others the review was minimal at best. I would have liked these authors to have used a standardized format to make it easier to compare differences in areas such as government funding, existence of a national health policy, and approved investigations in the initial evaluation of a dementia patient. In latter chapters, some topics are discussed only from the perspective of how the issue is handled in the author's country. Although an overview of how this issue is handled differently in all 18 European countries may have been too unwieldy, after reading about dementia care centers in England and Norway one wonders if they exist and to what degree in other countries, such as Spain or Belgium. Overall, the book is well written. Several authors are involved, and although there is considerable overlap there is very little disagreement and the message is usually quite clear. There are occasional words that differ on this side of the Atlantic, such as carer for caregiver, but these are few and do not interfere with the message. This book will be an interesting read for anyone involved in the care of patients with dementia, whether based in Europe or elsewhere or whether involved in primary or subspecialty care. As a physician working in the United States, I find it interesting to read the European perspective on the diagnosis of dementia and its treatment (both pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic). It is refreshing to see the high standards set by EDCON. It will, however, be a challenge for Europe, with its economically diverse nations, to afford the cost of the detailed and comprehensive care EDCON has recommended.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
痴呆症护理标准
由Alistair Burns代表欧洲痴呆症共识网络(EDCON)集团编辑。泰勒和弗朗西斯集团,纽约,纽约,2005年,224页,99.95美元。在人口逐渐老龄化的世界中,痴呆症是一个日益普遍的全球性问题。据国际阿尔茨海默病组织称,全世界有1800万人患有痴呆症,其中近25%生活在欧洲。因此,欧洲痴呆症护理的现状引起了人们的极大兴趣。在美国,对痴呆症的评估和治疗存在争议,导致老年医学、家庭医学、神经病学和精神病学组织制定了大量指南。痴呆症护理标准是欧洲痴呆症共识网络(EDCON)的一项雄心勃勃的努力,旨在总结和综合欧洲阿尔茨海默病治疗的当前实践和指南。EDCON的成员来自英国、荷兰、瑞士、西班牙和丹麦。本书分为6个部分:介绍,对痴呆症护理实践的欧洲观点,多学科工作,护理人员压力,服务和道德/法律问题。在大多数章节中,介绍了来自不同欧洲国家的观点。在题为“欧洲痴呆症护理标准——共识”的导言中,EDCON给出了痴呆症患者护理的6项一般性建议:护理标准化;以证据为基础并适用于不同护理场所的标准(例如,与长期护理机构相对的家庭);患者、其照护者及其卫生保健和社会工作者之间的伙伴关系;精心策划的服务;维护病人的尊严;以及照顾者的支持。第二部分包括对18个欧洲国家的痴呆症护理的一般审查。这可能是最有趣的部分,因为显示了国家之间服务的惊人差异。较富裕和拥有社会主义医疗保健的国家提供更详细和全面的服务,这些服务由政府资助。一些国家有政府资助的与痴呆症护理有关的研究,并有一项提供老年和痴呆症服务的国家卫生政策。一些国家有关于痴呆症诊断的指导方针,包括磁共振成像等调查的作用。痴呆症药物的覆盖范围也各不相同。昂贵的胆碱酯酶抑制剂的覆盖范围并不普遍,在丹麦等一些国家,只有神经科医生才能开处方。诸如日托、养老院护理、住院和临时护理等服务通常是可用的,但资金不足是常见的。亚专科服务往往是有限的,甚至根本不存在(例如,只有英国有发达的“老年精神病学”服务)。在德国,老年医生严重短缺,其中大多数集中在大学环境中。在比利时,银杏被包括在内,甚至有法律允许在非常特殊的情况下安乐死。乌克兰是一个资金和国家指导方针都不足的国家。也许正是由于这个原因,乌克兰的痴呆症患者自杀率很高。第三部分,“多学科工作”,包括13个不同的章节,涵盖了痴呆症护理中涉及的不同学科的问题。一些人讨论了这门学科在作者的祖国是如何运作的,而另一些人则讨论了这门学科的总体价值。例如,在第23章中,EDCON的成员、英国老年精神病学教授Alistair Burns博士解释了老年精神病学家的作用,尽管这个亚专业在欧洲大部分地区都没有发现。作者很好地概述了初级保健医生、专科医生、护士、社会工作者和其他照顾和治疗痴呆症患者的人如何能够而且应该共同努力,提高痴呆症患者接受的护理质量。第四部分是关于照顾者的压力。有趣的是,在欧洲,和在美国一样,大多数照顾者都是女性,她们要应对“巨大的心理压力”。这些章节概述了照顾者的压力,支持照顾者的组织,以及虐待老年人。每章都总结了主题并给出了实用的建议。在大多数情况下,这些章节没有过分详细说明任何一个国家的问题或资源,而是提供了一个更全球的视角。第五部分的标题是“服务”,这七章主要关注特定国家某些服务的可用性。主要提供记忆诊所和痴呆症服务中心。本文概述了记忆诊所,并就如何发展这些诊所提出了建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Twenty Years!: (Editorial) PCC: 20 Years Old and Growing: (Publisher's Note) Time for Celebration Anxiety: (Psychotherapy Casebook) We’re Turning a Page…
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1