Cognitive architectures: a way forward for the psychology of programming

Michael E. Hansen, A. Lumsdaine, Robert L. Goldstone
{"title":"Cognitive architectures: a way forward for the psychology of programming","authors":"Michael E. Hansen, A. Lumsdaine, Robert L. Goldstone","doi":"10.1145/2384592.2384596","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Programming language and library designers often debate the usability of particular design choices. These choices may impact many developers, yet scientific evidence for them is rarely provided. Cognitive models of program comprehension have existed for over thirty years, but the lack of quantitative (operational) validations for their internal components limits their utility for usability studies. To ease the burden of quantifying these existing models, we recommend using the ACT-R cognitive architecture - a simulation framework for psychological models. In this paper, we review the history of cognitive modeling in the psychology of programming. We provide an overview of the ACT-R cognitive architecture, and show how it could be used to fill in the gaps of an existing, yet incomplete, quantitative model (the Cognitive Complexity Metric). Lastly, we discuss the potential benefits and challenges associated with building a comprehensive cognitive model on top of a cognitive architecture.","PeriodicalId":168332,"journal":{"name":"SIGPLAN symposium on New ideas, new paradigms, and reflections on programming and software","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"22","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SIGPLAN symposium on New ideas, new paradigms, and reflections on programming and software","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2384592.2384596","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 22

Abstract

Programming language and library designers often debate the usability of particular design choices. These choices may impact many developers, yet scientific evidence for them is rarely provided. Cognitive models of program comprehension have existed for over thirty years, but the lack of quantitative (operational) validations for their internal components limits their utility for usability studies. To ease the burden of quantifying these existing models, we recommend using the ACT-R cognitive architecture - a simulation framework for psychological models. In this paper, we review the history of cognitive modeling in the psychology of programming. We provide an overview of the ACT-R cognitive architecture, and show how it could be used to fill in the gaps of an existing, yet incomplete, quantitative model (the Cognitive Complexity Metric). Lastly, we discuss the potential benefits and challenges associated with building a comprehensive cognitive model on top of a cognitive architecture.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
认知架构:编程心理学的前进之路
编程语言和库的设计者经常争论特定设计选择的可用性。这些选择可能会影响许多开发人员,但很少有科学证据支持这些选择。程序理解的认知模型已经存在了30多年,但缺乏对其内部组件的定量(可操作)验证限制了它们在可用性研究中的效用。为了减轻量化这些现有模型的负担,我们建议使用ACT-R认知架构-心理模型的模拟框架。在本文中,我们回顾了认知建模在程序设计心理学中的历史。我们提供了ACT-R认知架构的概述,并展示了如何使用它来填补现有但不完整的定量模型(认知复杂性度量)的空白。最后,我们讨论了在认知架构之上构建一个全面的认知模型的潜在好处和挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Usable live programming Growing solver-aided languages with rosette User model and system model: the yin and yang in user-centered software development Building connections between theories of computing and physical systems Usable security as a static-analysis problem: modeling and reasoning about user permissions in social-sharing systems
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1