The nature and function of argument in organizational bargaining research

Colleen M. Keough
{"title":"The nature and function of argument in organizational bargaining research","authors":"Colleen M. Keough","doi":"10.1080/10417948709372709","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This essay responds to several calls for an explication of the theoretical basis of argument in negotiation. Argument tends to be a generic term in negotiation studies, yet the manner in which argument is operationalized has great impact on the type of interpretations a researcher can make of his/her data. Four current argumentative perspectives are used to examine the nature and function of argument in organizational bargaining research. Toulmin's argument field perspective offers the most thorough analysis of labor‐management negotiations.","PeriodicalId":234061,"journal":{"name":"Southern Speech Communication Journal","volume":"79 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1987-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"15","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Southern Speech Communication Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10417948709372709","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

Abstract

This essay responds to several calls for an explication of the theoretical basis of argument in negotiation. Argument tends to be a generic term in negotiation studies, yet the manner in which argument is operationalized has great impact on the type of interpretations a researcher can make of his/her data. Four current argumentative perspectives are used to examine the nature and function of argument in organizational bargaining research. Toulmin's argument field perspective offers the most thorough analysis of labor‐management negotiations.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
组织议价研究中争论的性质和作用
本文回应了对谈判中争论的理论基础进行解释的呼声。在谈判研究中,论据往往是一个通用术语,然而,论据的操作方式对研究人员对其数据的解释类型有很大的影响。本文采用四种当前的论证视角来考察组织议价研究中论证的性质和作用。图尔敏的论证场视角为劳资谈判提供了最彻底的分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Whither applied interpersonal communication research: A practical perspective for practicing practitioners The importance of context in applied communication research Relational communication in applied contexts: Current status and future directions Differences in how physicians and patients perceive physicians’ relational communication Privacy in marital relationships
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1