{"title":"Language learning strategies and teaching practices in adult L2 education","authors":"Annika Norlund Shaswar, Åsa Wedin","doi":"10.17011/APPLES/URN.201907063590","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article highlights the use and co-construction of language learning strategies (LLS) in second language education for adults with short previous education. In a case study, we explore how LLS are used and co-constructed by one student and one teacher. The data for the article was created in an action research programme comprising two Swedish for Immigrants (SFI) schools, and the methodology used was classroom observation based in linguistic ethnography. In accordance with Griffiths (2013, p. 15) LLS are defined as “activities consciously chosen by learners for the purpose of regulating their own language learning”. For the analysis of LLS, Oxford’s (1990) taxonomy was chosen. In the chosen case the teacher and student co-constructed direct and indirect strategies. In their co-construction, they sometimes seemed to work together, both using a strategy initiated by one of them, and sometimes appeared to have opposite goals, so that the teacher-initiated strategies turned out as complicated for the student, while the student-initiated strategies were counteracted by the teacher. Some of the LLS promoted by the teacher that were difficult for the student seemed to demand literacy skills that he had not yet developed. This underlines the importance of adapting teaching to the language and literacy competences of the individual learner. It also highlights the importance of further research on LLS with this group of students in order to find strategies that work in the process of developing functional literacy skills.","PeriodicalId":409563,"journal":{"name":"Apples - Journal of Applied Language Studies","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Apples - Journal of Applied Language Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17011/APPLES/URN.201907063590","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4
Abstract
This article highlights the use and co-construction of language learning strategies (LLS) in second language education for adults with short previous education. In a case study, we explore how LLS are used and co-constructed by one student and one teacher. The data for the article was created in an action research programme comprising two Swedish for Immigrants (SFI) schools, and the methodology used was classroom observation based in linguistic ethnography. In accordance with Griffiths (2013, p. 15) LLS are defined as “activities consciously chosen by learners for the purpose of regulating their own language learning”. For the analysis of LLS, Oxford’s (1990) taxonomy was chosen. In the chosen case the teacher and student co-constructed direct and indirect strategies. In their co-construction, they sometimes seemed to work together, both using a strategy initiated by one of them, and sometimes appeared to have opposite goals, so that the teacher-initiated strategies turned out as complicated for the student, while the student-initiated strategies were counteracted by the teacher. Some of the LLS promoted by the teacher that were difficult for the student seemed to demand literacy skills that he had not yet developed. This underlines the importance of adapting teaching to the language and literacy competences of the individual learner. It also highlights the importance of further research on LLS with this group of students in order to find strategies that work in the process of developing functional literacy skills.
本文着重论述了语言学习策略在短期教育成人第二语言教育中的运用与构建。在一个案例研究中,我们探讨了一名学生和一名教师如何使用和共同构建LLS。本文的数据是在一个行动研究项目中创建的,该项目由两所瑞典移民学校(SFI)组成,使用的方法是基于语言人种学的课堂观察。Griffiths (2013, p. 15)将LLS定义为“学习者为了调节自己的语言学习而有意识地选择的活动”。对于LLS的分析,我们选择了Oxford(1990)的分类法。在选择的案例中,教师和学生共同构建直接策略和间接策略。在他们的共同建构中,他们有时似乎在一起工作,都使用由他们中的一个发起的策略,有时似乎有相反的目标,因此教师发起的策略对学生来说是复杂的,而学生发起的策略被教师抵消。老师提倡的一些对学生来说很难的LLS似乎要求他还没有掌握的读写技能。这强调了使教学适应学习者个人的语言和读写能力的重要性。它还强调了对这组学生进行进一步研究的重要性,以便找到在发展功能性读写技能的过程中起作用的策略。