Literary Justice: The Participatory Ethics of Early Modern Possible Worlds

D. Sarkar
{"title":"Literary Justice: The Participatory Ethics of Early Modern Possible Worlds","authors":"D. Sarkar","doi":"10.3366/edinburgh/9781474455589.003.0017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Where early modern writers traffic in imaginative inventions, they often do so with the aim of effecting positive change. In this chapter, Debapriya Sarkar puts pressure on the ethical relation between literature’s celebration of possible worlds and the pedagogical value of such imagined realms for the reader—and, by extension, for the student of early modern literature and culture. She shows how we might tap into the ubiquitous presence of imaginary worlds in early modern literature; these “golden” worlds of the imagination simultaneously practice and theorize ways of knowing and being in the actual world. What Sarkar calls “participatory readerly ethics” reveals “the radical potential of poiesis” to help us transform what is into what might be.","PeriodicalId":186553,"journal":{"name":"Teaching Social Justice Through Shakespeare","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Teaching Social Justice Through Shakespeare","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3366/edinburgh/9781474455589.003.0017","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Where early modern writers traffic in imaginative inventions, they often do so with the aim of effecting positive change. In this chapter, Debapriya Sarkar puts pressure on the ethical relation between literature’s celebration of possible worlds and the pedagogical value of such imagined realms for the reader—and, by extension, for the student of early modern literature and culture. She shows how we might tap into the ubiquitous presence of imaginary worlds in early modern literature; these “golden” worlds of the imagination simultaneously practice and theorize ways of knowing and being in the actual world. What Sarkar calls “participatory readerly ethics” reveals “the radical potential of poiesis” to help us transform what is into what might be.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
文学正义:早期现代可能世界的参与伦理
早期现代作家在创作富有想象力的发明时,往往是为了产生积极的变化。在这一章中,Debapriya Sarkar对文学对可能世界的庆祝与这种想象领域对读者的教育价值之间的伦理关系施加了压力,并引申为早期现代文学和文化的学生。她向我们展示了如何利用早期现代文学中无处不在的想象世界;这些想象的“金色”世界同时实践和理论化了认识和存在于现实世界中的方式。萨卡尔所说的“参与式读者伦理”揭示了“政治的激进潜力”,可以帮助我们将现状转变为可能的状态。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Shakespearean Tragedy, Ethics, and Social Justice Shakespeare in Japan: Disability and a Pedagogy of Disorientation “Intelligently organized resistance”: Shakespeare in the Diasporic Politics of John E. Bruce Rural Shakespeare and the Tragedy of Education Chicano Shakespeare: The Bard, the Border, and the Peripheries of Performance
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1