M. Hansen, B. Grønfeldt, Tue Rømer, Mathilde Fogelstrøm, Kasper Sørensen, S. Schmidt, J. Helge
{"title":"Determination of Maximal Oxygen Uptake Using Seismocardiography at Rest","authors":"M. Hansen, B. Grønfeldt, Tue Rømer, Mathilde Fogelstrøm, Kasper Sørensen, S. Schmidt, J. Helge","doi":"10.23919/cinc53138.2021.9662756","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Assessment of maximal oxygen consumption (VO<inf>2</inf>max) is an important clinical tool when examining both healthy and unhealthy populations, as a low VO<inf>2</inf>max is associated with cardiovascular disease and all-cause mortality. Aim: This study investigated the accuracy of a non-exercise test for assessment of VO<inf>2</inf>max using seismocardiography (SCG). Methods: 97 participants (20–45 years, 50 males) underwent a nonexercise test using SCG at rest in the supine position (SCG VO<inf>2</inf>max) and a graded exercise test to voluntary exhaustion on a cycle ergometer with indirect calorimetry (IC VO<inf>2</inf>max). An interim analysis was applied after 50 participants had completed testing (SCG VO<inf>2</inf>max 1.0) allowing for the algorithm to be modified (SCG VO<inf>2</inf>max 2.1). Results: SCG VO<inf>2</inf>max 2.1 (<tex>$n=47$</tex>, test set) estimation was <tex>$3.5 \\pm 1.8\\ ml\\cdot min^{-1}\\cdot kg^{-1}\\ (p < 0.001)$</tex> lower compared to IC VO<inf>2</inf>max, with a Pearson correlation of <tex>$r=0.65 (p < 0.0001)$</tex> and a standard error of estimate of 7.1 ml·min<sup>−1</sup> ·kg<sup>−1</sup>. The coefficient of variation between tests was <tex>$8\\ \\pm 1\\%$</tex>. Conclusion: The accuracy of VO<inf>2</inf>max assessment using SCG requires further optimization prior to clinical application, as SCG VO<inf>2</inf>max was systematically lower than IC VO<inf>2</inf>max, and only a moderate correlation together with considerable variation were observed between tests.","PeriodicalId":126746,"journal":{"name":"2021 Computing in Cardiology (CinC)","volume":"48 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 Computing in Cardiology (CinC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23919/cinc53138.2021.9662756","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Abstract
Introduction: Assessment of maximal oxygen consumption (VO2max) is an important clinical tool when examining both healthy and unhealthy populations, as a low VO2max is associated with cardiovascular disease and all-cause mortality. Aim: This study investigated the accuracy of a non-exercise test for assessment of VO2max using seismocardiography (SCG). Methods: 97 participants (20–45 years, 50 males) underwent a nonexercise test using SCG at rest in the supine position (SCG VO2max) and a graded exercise test to voluntary exhaustion on a cycle ergometer with indirect calorimetry (IC VO2max). An interim analysis was applied after 50 participants had completed testing (SCG VO2max 1.0) allowing for the algorithm to be modified (SCG VO2max 2.1). Results: SCG VO2max 2.1 ($n=47$, test set) estimation was $3.5 \pm 1.8\ ml\cdot min^{-1}\cdot kg^{-1}\ (p < 0.001)$ lower compared to IC VO2max, with a Pearson correlation of $r=0.65 (p < 0.0001)$ and a standard error of estimate of 7.1 ml·min−1 ·kg−1. The coefficient of variation between tests was $8\ \pm 1\%$. Conclusion: The accuracy of VO2max assessment using SCG requires further optimization prior to clinical application, as SCG VO2max was systematically lower than IC VO2max, and only a moderate correlation together with considerable variation were observed between tests.