A. Nada, Emad R. Issak, Khaled M. Kholaif, H. Torkey, I. Fawzy, Reham A. Mohsen
{"title":"Uterine artery hemodynamic changes due to a Cervical Traction maneuver (Amr’s maneuver); Randomized Controlled Study","authors":"A. Nada, Emad R. Issak, Khaled M. Kholaif, H. Torkey, I. Fawzy, Reham A. Mohsen","doi":"10.21608/ebwhj.2019.17714.1036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To measure the impacts of cervical traction on the uterine artery hemodynamics.Methods: This study was a randomized-controlled trial. The primary outcome measure was the uterine artery hemodynamics indices: end diastolic velocity (EDV) and systolic/diastolic velocity ratio (S/D ratio).Main Results: The study was conducted in one institution in Cairo from January-2017 to March-2017 with 12-month follow up period. Both groups were comparable (p-value > 0.05) with regard to the age, BMI, heart rate, blood pressure, gravidity, parity as well as episiotomy. There was no difference (P> 0.05) between the two groups regarding vital signs after the intervention. All the patients tolerated the procedure with mild sedation. PSV, EDV, S/D, PI & RI were comparable between both groups before the intervention. However, PSV, S/D ratio, RI & PI were significantly higher (p-values < 0.001) in the study group than the control group after the intervention. On the other hand, EDV was significantly lower in the study group than the control group after the intervention (p-value < 0.001). During the follow-up period, no adverse events reported.Conclusion: Amr’s maneuver is effective in changing the uterine artery hemodynamics indices in the direction of decreasing the uterine artery blood flow.","PeriodicalId":224226,"journal":{"name":"Evidence Based Womenʼs Health Journal","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evidence Based Womenʼs Health Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/ebwhj.2019.17714.1036","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: To measure the impacts of cervical traction on the uterine artery hemodynamics.Methods: This study was a randomized-controlled trial. The primary outcome measure was the uterine artery hemodynamics indices: end diastolic velocity (EDV) and systolic/diastolic velocity ratio (S/D ratio).Main Results: The study was conducted in one institution in Cairo from January-2017 to March-2017 with 12-month follow up period. Both groups were comparable (p-value > 0.05) with regard to the age, BMI, heart rate, blood pressure, gravidity, parity as well as episiotomy. There was no difference (P> 0.05) between the two groups regarding vital signs after the intervention. All the patients tolerated the procedure with mild sedation. PSV, EDV, S/D, PI & RI were comparable between both groups before the intervention. However, PSV, S/D ratio, RI & PI were significantly higher (p-values < 0.001) in the study group than the control group after the intervention. On the other hand, EDV was significantly lower in the study group than the control group after the intervention (p-value < 0.001). During the follow-up period, no adverse events reported.Conclusion: Amr’s maneuver is effective in changing the uterine artery hemodynamics indices in the direction of decreasing the uterine artery blood flow.