A Classification for Managing Software Engineering Knowledge

Angelika Kaplan, Maximilian Walter, R. Heinrich
{"title":"A Classification for Managing Software Engineering Knowledge","authors":"Angelika Kaplan, Maximilian Walter, R. Heinrich","doi":"10.1145/3463274.3463357","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This taxonomy paper presents a novel way of knowledge engineering in the software engineering research community. Till now, research papers are organized digitally as documents, mostly in PDF files. Not much effort is spent on effective knowledge classification, retrieval, storage, and representation. In contrast to the current paper-based approach for knowledge documentation, we present a statement-based approach, where each statement is linked to arguments and data of its evidence as well as to related statements. We argue that in this way, knowledge will be easier to retrieve, compare, and evaluate in contrast to current paper-based knowledge engineering in scientific search engines and digital libraries. Therefore, we present as a first step a novel multi-dimensional classification for statements in software engineering research. Statements are classified according to their research object, their kind (e.g., relevance), and their underlying evidence. This classification is validated and extended with a first systematic literature review. Additionally, we provide an example for illustration purpose.","PeriodicalId":328024,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering","volume":"99 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3463274.3463357","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This taxonomy paper presents a novel way of knowledge engineering in the software engineering research community. Till now, research papers are organized digitally as documents, mostly in PDF files. Not much effort is spent on effective knowledge classification, retrieval, storage, and representation. In contrast to the current paper-based approach for knowledge documentation, we present a statement-based approach, where each statement is linked to arguments and data of its evidence as well as to related statements. We argue that in this way, knowledge will be easier to retrieve, compare, and evaluate in contrast to current paper-based knowledge engineering in scientific search engines and digital libraries. Therefore, we present as a first step a novel multi-dimensional classification for statements in software engineering research. Statements are classified according to their research object, their kind (e.g., relevance), and their underlying evidence. This classification is validated and extended with a first systematic literature review. Additionally, we provide an example for illustration purpose.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
软件工程知识管理的分类
本文提出了软件工程研究界知识工程的一种新方法。到目前为止,研究论文大多以PDF文件的形式进行数字化组织。没有太多的精力花在有效的知识分类、检索、存储和表示上。与目前基于纸张的知识文档方法相比,我们提出了一种基于陈述的方法,其中每个陈述都与证据的论据和数据以及相关陈述相关联。我们认为,与目前科学搜索引擎和数字图书馆中基于纸张的知识工程相比,通过这种方式,知识将更容易检索、比较和评估。因此,我们在软件工程研究中提出了一种新的多维语句分类方法。陈述根据其研究对象、类型(例如,相关性)和潜在证据进行分类。通过第一次系统的文献回顾,这种分类得到了验证和扩展。此外,我们提供了一个例子来说明目的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
About the Assessment of Grey Literature in Software Engineering Towards an Automated Classification Approach for Software Engineering Research Fog Based Energy Efficient Process Framework for Smart Building Open Data-driven Usability Improvements of Static Code Analysis and its Challenges Towards a corpus for credibility assessment in software practitioner blog articles
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1