Reliability, Validity, and Clinical Utility of the Dominic Interactive for Adolescents–Revised

L. Bergeron, N. Smolla, C. Berthiaume, Johanne Renaud, J. Breton, Marie St.-Georges, P. Morin, Elissa Zavaglia, R. Labelle
{"title":"Reliability, Validity, and Clinical Utility of the Dominic Interactive for Adolescents–Revised","authors":"L. Bergeron, N. Smolla, C. Berthiaume, Johanne Renaud, J. Breton, Marie St.-Georges, P. Morin, Elissa Zavaglia, R. Labelle","doi":"10.1177/0706743716670129","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: The Dominic Interactive for Adolescents–Revised (DIA-R) is a multimedia self-report screen for 9 mental disorders, borderline personality traits, and suicidality defined by the fifth edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5). This study aimed to examine the reliability and the validity of this instrument. Methods: French- and English-speaking adolescents aged 12 to 15 years (N = 447) were recruited from schools and clinical settings in Montreal and were evaluated twice. The internal consistency was estimated by Cronbach alpha coefficients and the test-retest reliability by intraclass correlation coefficients. Cutoff points on the DIA-R scales were determined by using clinically relevant measures for defining external validation criteria: the Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia for School-Aged Children, the Beck Hopelessness Scale, and the Abbreviated-Diagnostic Interview for Borderlines. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses provided accuracy estimates (area under the ROC curve, sensitivity, specificity, likelihood ratio) to evaluate the ability of the DIA-R scales to predict external criteria. Results: For most of the DIA-R scales, reliability coefficients were excellent or moderate. High or moderate accuracy estimates from ROC analyses demonstrated the ability of the DIA-R thresholds to predict psychopathological conditions. These thresholds were generally capable to discriminate between clinical and school subsamples. However, the validity of the obsessions/compulsions scale was too low. Conclusions: Findings clearly support the reliability and the validity of the DIA-R. This instrument may be useful to assess a wide range of adolescents’ mental health problems in the continuum of services. This conclusion applies to all scales, except the obsessions/compulsions one.","PeriodicalId":309115,"journal":{"name":"The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0706743716670129","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Objectives: The Dominic Interactive for Adolescents–Revised (DIA-R) is a multimedia self-report screen for 9 mental disorders, borderline personality traits, and suicidality defined by the fifth edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5). This study aimed to examine the reliability and the validity of this instrument. Methods: French- and English-speaking adolescents aged 12 to 15 years (N = 447) were recruited from schools and clinical settings in Montreal and were evaluated twice. The internal consistency was estimated by Cronbach alpha coefficients and the test-retest reliability by intraclass correlation coefficients. Cutoff points on the DIA-R scales were determined by using clinically relevant measures for defining external validation criteria: the Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia for School-Aged Children, the Beck Hopelessness Scale, and the Abbreviated-Diagnostic Interview for Borderlines. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses provided accuracy estimates (area under the ROC curve, sensitivity, specificity, likelihood ratio) to evaluate the ability of the DIA-R scales to predict external criteria. Results: For most of the DIA-R scales, reliability coefficients were excellent or moderate. High or moderate accuracy estimates from ROC analyses demonstrated the ability of the DIA-R thresholds to predict psychopathological conditions. These thresholds were generally capable to discriminate between clinical and school subsamples. However, the validity of the obsessions/compulsions scale was too low. Conclusions: Findings clearly support the reliability and the validity of the DIA-R. This instrument may be useful to assess a wide range of adolescents’ mental health problems in the continuum of services. This conclusion applies to all scales, except the obsessions/compulsions one.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
青少年多米尼克互动量表的信度、效度和临床应用——修订
目的:多米尼克互动青少年-修订版(DIA-R)是一种多媒体自我报告屏幕,用于检测精神障碍诊断与统计手册(DSM-5)第五版中定义的9种精神障碍、边缘性人格特征和自杀行为。本研究旨在检验该工具的信度和效度。方法:从蒙特利尔的学校和临床机构招募了12至15岁的法语和英语青少年(N = 447),并进行了两次评估。内部一致性用Cronbach alpha系数估计,重测信度用类内相关系数估计。DIA-R量表的截止点是通过使用与临床相关的方法来确定外部验证标准的:学龄儿童情感障碍和精神分裂症量表、贝克绝望量表和边缘型人格障碍的简化诊断访谈。受试者工作特征(ROC)分析提供了准确性估计(ROC曲线下面积、敏感性、特异性、似然比),以评估DIA-R量表预测外部标准的能力。结果:大多数DIA-R量表的信度系数为优或中等。来自ROC分析的高或中等准确度估计证明了DIA-R阈值预测精神病理状况的能力。这些阈值通常能够区分临床和学校亚样本。然而,强迫/强迫量表的效度太低。结论:研究结果明确支持DIA-R的信度和效度。这一工具可能有助于在连续的服务中评估广泛的青少年心理健康问题。这个结论适用于所有的量表,除了强迫/强迫。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Combined Analysis of Genetically Correlated Traits Identifies Genes and Brain Regions for Insomnia: Une analyse combinée de traits génétiquement corrélés identifie les gènes et les régions du cerveau pour l’insomnie mGluR5 Facilitates Long-Term Synaptic Depression in a Stress-Induced Depressive Mouse Model Look Before You Leap: Representativeness of Those Completing Self-Reports in Early Psychosis Research Psychotherapies for Adolescents with Subclinical and Borderline Personality Disorder: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Community Treatment Order Outcomes in Quebec: A Unique Jurisdiction
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1