Concept of research literacy in academic continuing education: a systematic review

Filiz Keser Aschenberger, Thomas Pfeffer
{"title":"Concept of research literacy in academic continuing education: a systematic review","authors":"Filiz Keser Aschenberger, Thomas Pfeffer","doi":"10.53807/0501ical","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To date, research literacy has not been studied conceptually in academic continuing education even though it has gained recognition in practice as one of competence areas that learners need to acquire. The aim of our review was to identify the concepts and competences related to research literacy in academic continuing education in order to provide a fit concept of research literacy in academic continuing education. We roughly followed the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) statement. We conducted the search in the domains of continuing education and higher education, in case of lack of research in continuing education. Our search identified in total 857 items. Based on title and abstract review, we considered 111 articles for review. After scrutinising the full-text articles, we included 72 publications for the extraction of the data and analysis. The main finding of the review is the lack of research on research literacy in continuing education. Our search did not yield any study that focused on academic continuing education. A second important finding is the lack of a comprehensive and holistic concept of research literacy, not only for continuing education, but also for higher education. Especially with the global trends and changes altering ways of production and research, it is important to provide an up to date definition of research literacy and the right set of skills and competences that meet the needs of learners in academic continuing education.","PeriodicalId":133479,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of University Lifelong Learning","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of University Lifelong Learning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53807/0501ical","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To date, research literacy has not been studied conceptually in academic continuing education even though it has gained recognition in practice as one of competence areas that learners need to acquire. The aim of our review was to identify the concepts and competences related to research literacy in academic continuing education in order to provide a fit concept of research literacy in academic continuing education. We roughly followed the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) statement. We conducted the search in the domains of continuing education and higher education, in case of lack of research in continuing education. Our search identified in total 857 items. Based on title and abstract review, we considered 111 articles for review. After scrutinising the full-text articles, we included 72 publications for the extraction of the data and analysis. The main finding of the review is the lack of research on research literacy in continuing education. Our search did not yield any study that focused on academic continuing education. A second important finding is the lack of a comprehensive and holistic concept of research literacy, not only for continuing education, but also for higher education. Especially with the global trends and changes altering ways of production and research, it is important to provide an up to date definition of research literacy and the right set of skills and competences that meet the needs of learners in academic continuing education.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
学术继续教育中的研究素养概念:系统回顾
迄今为止,研究素养尚未在学术继续教育中进行概念研究,尽管它在实践中已被认可为学习者需要获得的能力领域之一。我们回顾的目的是确定学术继续教育中与研究素养相关的概念和能力,以便为学术继续教育中的研究素养提供一个合适的概念。我们大致遵循PRISMA(系统评价和元分析的首选报告项目)声明。在继续教育研究不足的情况下,我们在继续教育和高等教育领域进行了搜索。我们总共搜出了857件物品。根据标题和摘要综述,我们选择了111篇文章进行综述。在仔细审查全文文章后,我们纳入了72篇出版物进行数据提取和分析。本综述的主要发现是缺乏对继续教育中研究素养的研究。我们的搜索没有发现任何关于学术继续教育的研究。第二个重要发现是缺乏一个全面和整体的研究素养概念,不仅对继续教育如此,对高等教育也是如此。特别是随着生产和研究方式的全球趋势和变化,提供最新的研究素养定义以及满足学术继续教育学习者需求的正确技能和能力是很重要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Designing flexible learning pathways through microdegree programmes: Tallinn University’s approach to Lifelong Learning Multifaceted connections between theory and practice through a didactical lens – university continuing education's potential to impact the world How reaserchers reach impact through continuous professional education with and for healthcare professionals A critical analysis of European micro-credential development in an Erasmus+ project The Communiversity: A partnership approach to community engaged adult education
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1