{"title":"Terrorism and the Liberal Order: A Conceptual Framework","authors":"R. Kothari, Priyanka Bhaduri","doi":"10.1108/978-1-78769-919-920191008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the post-9/11 period, tackling the vertical and horizontal growth of international terrorism has become a major challenge for the international community, more pertinently for the liberal states. About three decades ago, Paul Wilkinson wrote a book entitled Terrorism and the Liberal State in which he made a hypothetical statement that the liberal states in today’s world were more vulnerable to terrorist attacks and threats than any other political system. Totalitarian societies do not provide any space to terrorism in view of the fact that this system does not recognize the importance of civil societies. However, the point to be noted is that in today’s globalized international order, terrorist activities are not only confined within the territory of liberal societies alone, rather it has engulfed many parts of the globe that includes non-liberal societies as well. Therefore, strengthening democratic regimes and values is not the solution to abolish terrorism. In this context, this chapter attempts to test Wilkinson’s propositions that liberal states are more vulnerable to terrorism than any other political system by making a comparative study between democratic and non-democratic regimes to identify the recent trends of terrorism.","PeriodicalId":287596,"journal":{"name":"The Impact of Global Terrorism on Economic and Political Development","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Impact of Global Terrorism on Economic and Political Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-78769-919-920191008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In the post-9/11 period, tackling the vertical and horizontal growth of international terrorism has become a major challenge for the international community, more pertinently for the liberal states. About three decades ago, Paul Wilkinson wrote a book entitled Terrorism and the Liberal State in which he made a hypothetical statement that the liberal states in today’s world were more vulnerable to terrorist attacks and threats than any other political system. Totalitarian societies do not provide any space to terrorism in view of the fact that this system does not recognize the importance of civil societies. However, the point to be noted is that in today’s globalized international order, terrorist activities are not only confined within the territory of liberal societies alone, rather it has engulfed many parts of the globe that includes non-liberal societies as well. Therefore, strengthening democratic regimes and values is not the solution to abolish terrorism. In this context, this chapter attempts to test Wilkinson’s propositions that liberal states are more vulnerable to terrorism than any other political system by making a comparative study between democratic and non-democratic regimes to identify the recent trends of terrorism.
在后9/11时期,应对国际恐怖主义的纵向和横向增长已成为国际社会,尤其是自由主义国家面临的重大挑战。大约30年前,保罗·威尔金森(Paul Wilkinson)写了一本名为《恐怖主义与自由主义国家》(Terrorism and the Liberal State)的书,在书中他提出了一个假设,即当今世界上的自由主义国家比任何其他政治制度都更容易受到恐怖袭击和威胁。极权主义社会不给恐怖主义提供任何空间,因为这一制度不承认公民社会的重要性。然而,需要指出的是,在今天全球化的国际秩序中,恐怖主义活动不仅局限于自由社会的领土内,它还吞没了包括非自由社会在内的全球许多地区。因此,加强民主制度和价值观并不是消灭恐怖主义的解决办法。在此背景下,本章试图通过对民主和非民主政权的比较研究来确定恐怖主义的近期趋势,从而检验威尔金森的命题,即自由国家比任何其他政治制度都更容易受到恐怖主义的影响。