Active and Passive Oddball Paradigm for Automatic Speech Discrimination Assessment

Pimwipa Charuthamrong, P. Israsena, S. Hemrungrojn, S. Pan-Ngum
{"title":"Active and Passive Oddball Paradigm for Automatic Speech Discrimination Assessment","authors":"Pimwipa Charuthamrong, P. Israsena, S. Hemrungrojn, S. Pan-Ngum","doi":"10.1109/BioSMART54244.2021.9677707","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"An oddball paradigm is an experimental design that uses a sequence of one repeating stimulus called the standard stimulus. This sequence is infrequently interrupted by a different stimulus called the deviant or target stimulus. Potentially the oddball paradigm can be employed in an EEG-based speech discrimination assessment protocol. Speech discrimination indicates how well a person can differentiate between different words. Analyzing EEG measurements such as the Event-Related Potentials (ERPs) may help to achieve the goal of automated assessment process. In this work we compare two listening modes in an oddball paradigm in order to find a suitable mode for assessing speech discrimination automatically. The two listening modes include passive and active listening. Passive listening is when the listener does not pay attention to what they hear. Active listening is when the listener actively pays attention to the sound. We tested these two listening modes using two Thai words with consonant contrast. We compared the ERP waveform, classification accuracy, and attention during passive and active listening. We found that passive listening produced clearer ERP waveform. However, active listening achieved higher accuracy and engaged less attention. Therefore, we recommend using active listening for an auditory oddball paradigm when assessing speech discrimination.","PeriodicalId":286026,"journal":{"name":"2021 4th International Conference on Bio-Engineering for Smart Technologies (BioSMART)","volume":"32 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 4th International Conference on Bio-Engineering for Smart Technologies (BioSMART)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/BioSMART54244.2021.9677707","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

An oddball paradigm is an experimental design that uses a sequence of one repeating stimulus called the standard stimulus. This sequence is infrequently interrupted by a different stimulus called the deviant or target stimulus. Potentially the oddball paradigm can be employed in an EEG-based speech discrimination assessment protocol. Speech discrimination indicates how well a person can differentiate between different words. Analyzing EEG measurements such as the Event-Related Potentials (ERPs) may help to achieve the goal of automated assessment process. In this work we compare two listening modes in an oddball paradigm in order to find a suitable mode for assessing speech discrimination automatically. The two listening modes include passive and active listening. Passive listening is when the listener does not pay attention to what they hear. Active listening is when the listener actively pays attention to the sound. We tested these two listening modes using two Thai words with consonant contrast. We compared the ERP waveform, classification accuracy, and attention during passive and active listening. We found that passive listening produced clearer ERP waveform. However, active listening achieved higher accuracy and engaged less attention. Therefore, we recommend using active listening for an auditory oddball paradigm when assessing speech discrimination.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
语音识别自动评估的主动和被动古怪范式
古怪的范式是一种实验设计,它使用一系列重复的刺激,称为标准刺激。这一序列很少被称为偏离刺激或目标刺激的不同刺激所中断。潜在的古怪范式可以用于基于脑电图的语音识别评估协议。言语辨别能力是指一个人区分不同单词的能力。分析脑电图测量,如事件相关电位(erp)可能有助于实现自动化评估过程的目标。在这项工作中,我们比较了两种听模式在一个古怪的范式中,以找到一个合适的模式来自动评估语音识别。这两种倾听方式包括被动倾听和主动倾听。被动倾听是指听者不注意他们所听到的内容。主动倾听是指听者主动地注意声音。我们用两个有辅音对比的泰语单词来测试这两种听力模式。我们比较了被动聆听和主动聆听时的ERP波形、分类准确率和注意力。我们发现被动聆听产生了更清晰的ERP波形。然而,主动倾听获得了更高的准确性和更少的注意力。因此,我们建议在评估言语歧视时使用主动倾听作为听觉怪异范式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
An Efficient Electrode Ranking Method for Single Trial Detection of EEG Error-Related Potentials Efficacy of AR Haptic Simulation for Nursing Student Education In silico study of sensitivity of polymeric prism-based surface plasmon resonance sensors based on graphene and molybdenum disulfide layers A Social Robot with Conversational Capabilities for Visitor Reception: Design and Framework MICSurv: Medical Image Clustering for Survival risk group identification
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1