Health Inequities in Aging Adults from a Public Health Perspective

S. Wallace
{"title":"Health Inequities in Aging Adults from a Public Health Perspective","authors":"S. Wallace","doi":"10.1093/acrefore/9780190632366.013.274","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Inequities in the United States have gained renewed attention as a result of social movements such as Black Lives Matter (racism), Me Too (sexual abuse and gender), and immigrant rights. Yet despite the growing awareness of inequality across major social categories, there has been little or no public attention paid to the persistent inequities facing older adults. The news media in the 2020 presidential elections uncritically reported charges that one, or both, candidates were “too old” for the job or had some other liability tied primarily to their age. There is a whole field of “anti-aging” medicine that claims to slow the biological process of senescence (distinct from fighting specific diseases), even as the greatest challenges of growing older are rooted in social and political processes. This reflects the ageism in society that results in undervaluing older adults’ lives and often marginalizes them. In addition, there are serious inequities within the older population based on class, race, gender, and citizenship status.\n Health inequities involve conditions that are avoidable, are not the result of informed choice (e.g., injuries among extreme sports participants), and which differ by membership in groups that hold different levels of power and resources. As such, inequities also include an element of “unfairness” such that the disadvantage is in groups with less power and resources than others.","PeriodicalId":342682,"journal":{"name":"Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Global Public Health","volume":"118 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Global Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190632366.013.274","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Inequities in the United States have gained renewed attention as a result of social movements such as Black Lives Matter (racism), Me Too (sexual abuse and gender), and immigrant rights. Yet despite the growing awareness of inequality across major social categories, there has been little or no public attention paid to the persistent inequities facing older adults. The news media in the 2020 presidential elections uncritically reported charges that one, or both, candidates were “too old” for the job or had some other liability tied primarily to their age. There is a whole field of “anti-aging” medicine that claims to slow the biological process of senescence (distinct from fighting specific diseases), even as the greatest challenges of growing older are rooted in social and political processes. This reflects the ageism in society that results in undervaluing older adults’ lives and often marginalizes them. In addition, there are serious inequities within the older population based on class, race, gender, and citizenship status. Health inequities involve conditions that are avoidable, are not the result of informed choice (e.g., injuries among extreme sports participants), and which differ by membership in groups that hold different levels of power and resources. As such, inequities also include an element of “unfairness” such that the disadvantage is in groups with less power and resources than others.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从公共卫生的角度看老年人的健康不平等
由于“黑人的命也是命”(种族主义)、“我也是”(性侵犯和性别)、移民权利等社会运动,美国的不平等问题再次受到关注。然而,尽管人们越来越意识到主要社会类别之间的不平等,但公众很少或根本没有关注老年人面临的持续不平等。在2020年总统大选中,新闻媒体不加批判地报道了一些指控,称其中一名或两名候选人“年龄太大”,不适合担任总统,或者有其他一些主要与年龄相关的责任。有一整个“抗衰老”医学领域声称可以减缓衰老的生物过程(与对抗特定疾病不同),尽管衰老的最大挑战根植于社会和政治进程。这反映了社会上的年龄歧视,这种歧视导致老年人的生活被低估,并经常被边缘化。此外,老年人口中存在着严重的阶级、种族、性别和公民身份不平等。卫生不平等涉及可避免的状况,不是知情选择的结果(例如,极限运动参与者受伤),并且因拥有不同权力和资源水平的群体成员而有所不同。因此,不平等还包括“不公平”的因素,即弱势群体的权力和资源比其他群体少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Firearm Injuries and Public Health Monitoring Migrants’ Health Risk Factors for Noncommunicable Diseases The Implications of Informal Settlement Upgrading Programs for Access to Water, Sanitation, and Public Health Drowning: Global Burden, Risk Factors, and Prevention Strategies Migration, Migrants, and Health in Latin America and the Caribbean
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1