Features of e-court regulation in Ukraine

O. Uliutina, O. Artemenko
{"title":"Features of e-court regulation in Ukraine","authors":"O. Uliutina, O. Artemenko","doi":"10.31548/law2022.04.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The relevance of the subject under study is determined by the fact that five years ago in Ukraine, the transition to the electronic justice system began with the purpose of increasing the level of public trust in judicial bodies, speeding up the terms of consideration of cases and saving time. However, as of the end of 2022, the operation of electronic courts faced certain difficulties. The purpose of this study was a comprehensive regulatory analysis of the transition of the judicial system to the implementation of electronic legal proceedings. The methods used in this study included system-structural, comparative, comparative legal, formal legal. The results of the present study found that the process of launching electronic legal proceedings began in 2017 after the adoption of the Law of Ukraine “On Amendments to the Economic Procedural Code of Ukraine, the Civil Procedural Code of Ukraine, the Code of Administrative Procedure of Ukraine and other legislative acts” and continues until now. It was found that in the conditions when the legal regime of martial law is in effect, the accession of all courts of Ukraine to the subsystem of the “Electronic court” would substantially speed up the consideration of cases and relieve the courts that were not under occupation. The paper substantiated the necessity of considering the practices of Estonia, which has one of the best automated judicial systems in the world. It was established that despite the perfect statutory regulation of electronic legal proceedings, it is also necessary to provide financial and technical support for courts to fully join such a subsystem. The materials of this study can be useful in investigating the disciplines “Judicial and Law Enforcement Agencies”, “Problems of Judicial Proceedings in Ukraine”, “Information Law”, etc.","PeriodicalId":142294,"journal":{"name":"Law. Human. Environment","volume":"42 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Law. Human. Environment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31548/law2022.04.006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The relevance of the subject under study is determined by the fact that five years ago in Ukraine, the transition to the electronic justice system began with the purpose of increasing the level of public trust in judicial bodies, speeding up the terms of consideration of cases and saving time. However, as of the end of 2022, the operation of electronic courts faced certain difficulties. The purpose of this study was a comprehensive regulatory analysis of the transition of the judicial system to the implementation of electronic legal proceedings. The methods used in this study included system-structural, comparative, comparative legal, formal legal. The results of the present study found that the process of launching electronic legal proceedings began in 2017 after the adoption of the Law of Ukraine “On Amendments to the Economic Procedural Code of Ukraine, the Civil Procedural Code of Ukraine, the Code of Administrative Procedure of Ukraine and other legislative acts” and continues until now. It was found that in the conditions when the legal regime of martial law is in effect, the accession of all courts of Ukraine to the subsystem of the “Electronic court” would substantially speed up the consideration of cases and relieve the courts that were not under occupation. The paper substantiated the necessity of considering the practices of Estonia, which has one of the best automated judicial systems in the world. It was established that despite the perfect statutory regulation of electronic legal proceedings, it is also necessary to provide financial and technical support for courts to fully join such a subsystem. The materials of this study can be useful in investigating the disciplines “Judicial and Law Enforcement Agencies”, “Problems of Judicial Proceedings in Ukraine”, “Information Law”, etc.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
乌克兰电子法院监管的特点
所研究课题的相关性是由以下事实决定的:五年前在乌克兰开始向电子司法系统过渡,其目的是提高公众对司法机构的信任程度,加快审议案件的条件和节省时间。然而,截至2022年底,电子法院的运行面临一定困难。这项研究的目的是对司法系统向实施电子法律程序的过渡进行全面的监管分析。本研究采用的方法包括系统结构法、比较法、比较法和形式法。本研究的结果发现,启动电子诉讼程序的过程始于2017年乌克兰法律“关于修改乌克兰经济诉讼法,乌克兰民事诉讼法,乌克兰行政诉讼法和其他立法行为”并持续到现在。人们认为,在实行戒严法的法律制度的情况下,乌克兰所有法院加入“电子法院”子系统将大大加快案件的审议,并减轻未被占领的法院的负担。该文件证实有必要考虑爱沙尼亚的做法,因为爱沙尼亚拥有世界上最好的自动司法系统之一。本文认为,尽管电子诉讼的法律规制较为完善,但要使法院全面加入电子诉讼子系统,还需要提供资金和技术支持。本研究的材料可用于研究“司法和执法机构”、“乌克兰司法程序问题”、“信息法”等学科。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Administrative liability of juveniles for smoking Epistemological construction doctrine of the veterinary care defect phenomenon in forensic veterinary examination International experience in the use of alternative energy sources (within the European Union) Confiscation as a special sign of protection of intellectual property rights The role of collective-contractual regulation in ensuring the right of agricultural workers to a safe and healthy working environment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1