Evaluation of efficiency in the adult cystic fibrosis clinic at the Halifax Infirmary

Justin White, P. Landry, M. Chiasson
{"title":"Evaluation of efficiency in the adult cystic fibrosis clinic at the Halifax Infirmary","authors":"Justin White, P. Landry, M. Chiasson","doi":"10.15273/DMJ.VOL43NO2.7056","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The adult cystic fibrosis clinic in Halifax provides team-based care. Appointments are lengthy with high truancy. Our two-part efficiency study examined clinic flow, appointment length, and identified inefficiencies. A follow-up study was conducted to assess for improvements. Variables included total clinic time for each patient and total time spent alone waiting. Attempts to rectify problems were made after the first study. Outcomes were compared using analysis of variance. We found that patients wait significantly longer on Fridays (p 0.05), and patients with known methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus wait significantly longer (p < 0.05). Patients who arrive earlier wait significantly longer (p < 0.05), while patients who arrive late wait less overall. No significant difference was found after the second study. Despite changing scheduling, procedures and notifying patients, no significant improvements in efficiency were found. Further measures may be required.","PeriodicalId":293977,"journal":{"name":"Dalhousie Medical Journal","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dalhousie Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15273/DMJ.VOL43NO2.7056","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The adult cystic fibrosis clinic in Halifax provides team-based care. Appointments are lengthy with high truancy. Our two-part efficiency study examined clinic flow, appointment length, and identified inefficiencies. A follow-up study was conducted to assess for improvements. Variables included total clinic time for each patient and total time spent alone waiting. Attempts to rectify problems were made after the first study. Outcomes were compared using analysis of variance. We found that patients wait significantly longer on Fridays (p 0.05), and patients with known methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus wait significantly longer (p < 0.05). Patients who arrive earlier wait significantly longer (p < 0.05), while patients who arrive late wait less overall. No significant difference was found after the second study. Despite changing scheduling, procedures and notifying patients, no significant improvements in efficiency were found. Further measures may be required.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
哈利法克斯医院成人囊性纤维化临床疗效评价
哈利法克斯的成人囊性纤维化诊所提供团队护理。预约时间长,逃课率高。我们的两部分效率研究检查了诊所流量,预约时间,并确定了效率低下。进行了一项后续研究以评估改善情况。变量包括每个病人的总门诊时间和单独等待的总时间。在第一次研究之后,对问题进行了纠正。采用方差分析对结果进行比较。我们发现患者在周五等待的时间明显更长(p 0.05),已知耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌的患者等待的时间明显更长(p < 0.05)。较早到达的患者等待时间较长(p < 0.05),而较晚到达的患者总体等待时间较短。第二次研究后无明显差异。尽管改变了日程安排、程序并通知了患者,但效率没有显著提高。可能需要采取进一步措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Hackathons within medical education: Promoting cutting-edge innovation in surgery The association between gestational age at delivery and neonatal abstinence syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis Two for the price of one: The benefits of job sharing to increase women representation in surgical specialties Cutting edge hackathon competition winners strive to better support more surgeons with primary childcare responsibilities A discussion of contemporary platforms for women in surgery
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1