Does the running of a photovoltaic installation without a power storage facility on or adjacent to a private dwelling constitute an ‘economic activity’ within the VAT Directive?

Tina Ehrke-Rabel, Barbara Gunacker-Slawitsch
{"title":"Does the running of a photovoltaic installation without a power storage facility on or adjacent to a private dwelling constitute an ‘economic activity’ within the VAT Directive?","authors":"Tina Ehrke-Rabel, Barbara Gunacker-Slawitsch","doi":"10.5235/WJOVL.1.2.198","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Austrian Supreme Administrative Court (Verwaltungsgerichtshof, VwGH) presented a pending case to the ECJ by asking for a preliminary ruling. The question was whether the running of a photovoltaic plant on or adjacent to a private house constitutes a taxable activity under the VAT Directive, if the energy produced by this plant is fed into the public power grid for consideration. In return, the private household that owns this plant has its energy supplied by this public supplier. The consideration paid by the public supplier to the household for feeding into the grid is equal to the price the private household pays for the supply of energy. Although the private household’s photovoltaic system produces less energy than the household needs for its own purposes, this energy is fed into the public power grid. According to the VwGH this might be due to the fact that the photovoltaic plant in question is not equipped with a storage system. The private household considering carrying out an economic activity applied for the input VAT on the acquisition of the photovoltaic system to be refunded. The tax administration refused, and the Court of Appeal (Unabhänigiger Finanzsenat, UFS) granted the deduction, affirming the existence of an economic activity in accordance with Article 9 RVD. The tax administration lodged an appeal. Although the German Tax Supreme Court (BFH) consistently considers the feeding of privately produced energy into the public power grid as constituting an economic activity under the RVD, the Austrian Supreme Court remains doubtful.","PeriodicalId":114680,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of VAT/GST Law","volume":"42 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of VAT/GST Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5235/WJOVL.1.2.198","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The Austrian Supreme Administrative Court (Verwaltungsgerichtshof, VwGH) presented a pending case to the ECJ by asking for a preliminary ruling. The question was whether the running of a photovoltaic plant on or adjacent to a private house constitutes a taxable activity under the VAT Directive, if the energy produced by this plant is fed into the public power grid for consideration. In return, the private household that owns this plant has its energy supplied by this public supplier. The consideration paid by the public supplier to the household for feeding into the grid is equal to the price the private household pays for the supply of energy. Although the private household’s photovoltaic system produces less energy than the household needs for its own purposes, this energy is fed into the public power grid. According to the VwGH this might be due to the fact that the photovoltaic plant in question is not equipped with a storage system. The private household considering carrying out an economic activity applied for the input VAT on the acquisition of the photovoltaic system to be refunded. The tax administration refused, and the Court of Appeal (Unabhänigiger Finanzsenat, UFS) granted the deduction, affirming the existence of an economic activity in accordance with Article 9 RVD. The tax administration lodged an appeal. Although the German Tax Supreme Court (BFH) consistently considers the feeding of privately produced energy into the public power grid as constituting an economic activity under the RVD, the Austrian Supreme Court remains doubtful.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在私人住宅上或附近运行没有电力储存设施的光伏装置是否构成增值税指令中的“经济活动”?
奥地利最高行政法院(Verwaltungsgerichtshof, VwGH)向欧洲法院提出了一项悬而未决的案件,要求作出初步裁决。问题是,根据增值税指令,在私人住宅上或附近运行光伏电站是否构成应税活动,如果该电站产生的能源被输入公共电网供考虑。作为回报,拥有这个工厂的私人家庭的能源由这个公共供应商提供。公共供应商为家庭接入电网支付的对价等于私人家庭为能源供应支付的价格。尽管私人家庭的光伏系统产生的能量比家庭自身所需的能量要少,但这些能量被送入公共电网。根据VwGH的说法,这可能是由于有问题的光伏电站没有配备存储系统。考虑开展经济活动的私人家庭申请购买光伏系统的进项增值税将被退还。税务机关拒绝,上诉法院(Unabhänigiger Finanzsenat, UFS)准予扣除,确认存在根据RVD第9条规定的经济活动。税务机关提出了上诉。尽管德国税务最高法院(BFH)一贯认为,根据RVD,向公共电网提供私人生产的能源构成经济活动,但奥地利最高法院仍持怀疑态度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Equality under State aid rules and VAT The direct and immediate link with specialised services contracts as a measure for the right to deduct input VAT and the uncertainty in European tax law VAT deduction and member state sovereignty: (still) a good idea? EU VAT at the dawn of the Fourth Industrial Revolution* VAT information asymmetries in the context of intra-EU trade in goods
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1