Experimental Methods in IIR: The Tension between Rigour and Ethics in Studies Involving Users with Dyslexia

G. Berget, A. MacFarlane
{"title":"Experimental Methods in IIR: The Tension between Rigour and Ethics in Studies Involving Users with Dyslexia","authors":"G. Berget, A. MacFarlane","doi":"10.1145/3295750.3298939","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Designing user studies in the interactive information retrieval (IIR) paradigm on people with impairments may sometimes require different methodological considerations than for other users. Consequently, there may be a tension between what the community regards as being a rigorous methodology against what researchers can do ethically with their users. This paper discusses issues to consider when designing IIR studies involving people with dyslexia, such as sampling, informed consent and data collection. The conclusion is that conducting user studies on participants with dyslexia requires special considerations at all stages of the experimental design. The purpose of this paper is to raise awareness and understanding in the research community about experimental methods involving users with dyslexia, and addresses researchers, as well as editors and reviewers. Several of the issues raised do not only apply to people with dyslexia, but have implications when researching other groups, for instance elderly people and users with learning, cognitive, sensory or motor impairments.","PeriodicalId":187771,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Human Information Interaction and Retrieval","volume":"5 1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Human Information Interaction and Retrieval","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3295750.3298939","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Designing user studies in the interactive information retrieval (IIR) paradigm on people with impairments may sometimes require different methodological considerations than for other users. Consequently, there may be a tension between what the community regards as being a rigorous methodology against what researchers can do ethically with their users. This paper discusses issues to consider when designing IIR studies involving people with dyslexia, such as sampling, informed consent and data collection. The conclusion is that conducting user studies on participants with dyslexia requires special considerations at all stages of the experimental design. The purpose of this paper is to raise awareness and understanding in the research community about experimental methods involving users with dyslexia, and addresses researchers, as well as editors and reviewers. Several of the issues raised do not only apply to people with dyslexia, but have implications when researching other groups, for instance elderly people and users with learning, cognitive, sensory or motor impairments.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
IIR的实验方法:涉及阅读障碍使用者的研究中严谨与伦理之间的张力
在交互式信息检索(IIR)范式中设计针对残疾人的用户研究有时可能需要与其他用户不同的方法考虑。因此,在社区所认为的严谨的方法论与研究人员对其用户所能做的合乎道德的事情之间可能存在紧张关系。本文讨论了在设计涉及阅读障碍患者的IIR研究时需要考虑的问题,如抽样、知情同意和数据收集。结论是,对有阅读障碍的参与者进行用户研究需要在实验设计的各个阶段都进行特殊的考虑。本文的目的是提高研究界对涉及阅读障碍用户的实验方法的认识和理解,并向研究人员、编辑和审稿人提出建议。提出的一些问题不仅适用于有阅读障碍的人,而且在研究其他群体时也有影响,例如老年人和有学习、认知、感觉或运动障碍的用户。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Assisting Health Consumers While Searching the Web through Medical Annotations Do Metrics Matter? Understanding Context for Tasks and Activities NotifyMeHere: Intelligent Notification Delivery in Multi-Device Environments Computational Surprise, Perceptual Surprise, and Personal Background in Text Understanding
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1