Improving the Steam Quality injected in a Heavy Oil Reservoir by Using a Cyclonic-Type Condensate Separator: A Field Pilot

Andres Solano Arias
{"title":"Improving the Steam Quality injected in a Heavy Oil Reservoir by Using a Cyclonic-Type Condensate Separator: A Field Pilot","authors":"Andres Solano Arias","doi":"10.2118/208936-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Steam quality surveillance is important for steam injection since the oil production response expected depends on the heat injected to the reservoir. This paper focuses on the evaluation of a mechanical device whose target is to increase the steam quality by means of physical principles such as centrifugal force and gravity, removing the water liquid phase not converted into steam as a result of the design limitations that a steam generator has in terms of steam dryness by scale deposition in the boiler piping. The following program was implemented to test the device, a cyclonic condensate separator, including different operational ways for disposing of the liquid phase removed by the separator. To begin, the separator was engaged to a steam generator outlet (25 MMBTU/hr capacity). A group of 3 wells close to the steam generator was selected to compare three operative ways for handling the hard and hot water removed by the cyclonic separator. An additional liquid phase sampling trap was installed downstream of the separator in the steam line to verify the steam quality by means of digital conductivity measurements.\n Steam injection on selected wells started sequentially and operational parameters as pressure, temperature, conductivity, steam quality, and gallons per minute (GPM) were collected from the steam generator and the cyclonic separator. Theoretical calculations for determining the heat generated, removed (via the liquid phase) and finally injected into the wells in MMBTU were done by using variables such as feeding water, operation time, enthalpy and steam quality, contrasting results obtained against the values given by the cyclonic separator. Finally, production results are shown and analyzed although they are not considered as relevant for evaluating the cyclonic separator effectiveness, since the main objective of the pilot was to check the steam quality increasing (above 95%) at field conditions.\n By using the cyclonic condensate separator, the injected steam quality increased from 81% to 98% on average during 41 operation days in a row. This improvement also was confirmed by the steam-trap installed downstream of the cyclonic separator (only 1.6% difference). The steam pressure and temperature losses caused by the cyclonic separator were 17% and 5% on average, respectively. From the cyclonic separator data and theoretical calculations, it was determined the cyclonic steam separator removed 227 bbl of water per day (17%) on average from the initial volumetric flow rate given by the generator (1407 water bbl/day at 41 GPM). In terms of energy, the cyclonic separator removed as liquid condensate 8% (41 MMBTU/day) of the initial energy given by the generator (527 MMBTU/day), in search of increasing the steam quality.\n From the three disposal options considered for the liquid phase that was removed, it was determined that injecting the liquid directly into the main production line was the most efficient way for handling this fluid, since it was observed that the hot water (354 °F and 21% flash steam) acted as a hot spot, improving the oil mobility inside the pipeline. This approach also reduces the costs of transporting the water removed to the treatment facility.","PeriodicalId":146458,"journal":{"name":"Day 1 Wed, March 16, 2022","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 1 Wed, March 16, 2022","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/208936-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Steam quality surveillance is important for steam injection since the oil production response expected depends on the heat injected to the reservoir. This paper focuses on the evaluation of a mechanical device whose target is to increase the steam quality by means of physical principles such as centrifugal force and gravity, removing the water liquid phase not converted into steam as a result of the design limitations that a steam generator has in terms of steam dryness by scale deposition in the boiler piping. The following program was implemented to test the device, a cyclonic condensate separator, including different operational ways for disposing of the liquid phase removed by the separator. To begin, the separator was engaged to a steam generator outlet (25 MMBTU/hr capacity). A group of 3 wells close to the steam generator was selected to compare three operative ways for handling the hard and hot water removed by the cyclonic separator. An additional liquid phase sampling trap was installed downstream of the separator in the steam line to verify the steam quality by means of digital conductivity measurements. Steam injection on selected wells started sequentially and operational parameters as pressure, temperature, conductivity, steam quality, and gallons per minute (GPM) were collected from the steam generator and the cyclonic separator. Theoretical calculations for determining the heat generated, removed (via the liquid phase) and finally injected into the wells in MMBTU were done by using variables such as feeding water, operation time, enthalpy and steam quality, contrasting results obtained against the values given by the cyclonic separator. Finally, production results are shown and analyzed although they are not considered as relevant for evaluating the cyclonic separator effectiveness, since the main objective of the pilot was to check the steam quality increasing (above 95%) at field conditions. By using the cyclonic condensate separator, the injected steam quality increased from 81% to 98% on average during 41 operation days in a row. This improvement also was confirmed by the steam-trap installed downstream of the cyclonic separator (only 1.6% difference). The steam pressure and temperature losses caused by the cyclonic separator were 17% and 5% on average, respectively. From the cyclonic separator data and theoretical calculations, it was determined the cyclonic steam separator removed 227 bbl of water per day (17%) on average from the initial volumetric flow rate given by the generator (1407 water bbl/day at 41 GPM). In terms of energy, the cyclonic separator removed as liquid condensate 8% (41 MMBTU/day) of the initial energy given by the generator (527 MMBTU/day), in search of increasing the steam quality. From the three disposal options considered for the liquid phase that was removed, it was determined that injecting the liquid directly into the main production line was the most efficient way for handling this fluid, since it was observed that the hot water (354 °F and 21% flash steam) acted as a hot spot, improving the oil mobility inside the pipeline. This approach also reduces the costs of transporting the water removed to the treatment facility.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用旋流式凝析油分离器改善稠油油藏注汽质量的现场试验
蒸汽质量监测对于蒸汽注入非常重要,因为预期的石油生产响应取决于注入到储层的热量。本文重点评价了一种机械装置,其目的是通过离心力和重力等物理原理来提高蒸汽质量,去除由于蒸汽发生器在锅炉管道中因水垢沉积而导致蒸汽干燥的设计限制而无法转化为蒸汽的水-液相。下面的程序被执行,以测试设备,一个旋风冷凝水分离器,包括不同的操作方式处理由分离器除去的液相。首先,分离器连接到蒸汽发生器出口(容量为25mmbtu /hr)。选择靠近蒸汽发生器的3口井,比较了处理旋风分离器分离出的硬水和热水的三种操作方式。在蒸汽管道的分离器下游安装了一个额外的液相采样阀,通过数字电导率测量来验证蒸汽质量。在选定的井中依次开始注汽,并从蒸汽发生器和旋风分离器收集压力、温度、电导率、蒸汽质量和加仑/分钟(GPM)等操作参数。通过使用进给水、操作时间、焓和蒸汽质量等变量,将得到的结果与旋风分离器给出的值进行对比,对MMBTU中产生、除去(通过液相)并最终注入井中的热量进行了理论计算。最后,对生产结果进行了显示和分析,尽管这些结果与评估旋风分离器的有效性无关,因为中试的主要目标是在现场条件下检查蒸汽质量的增加(95%以上)。采用旋流式冷凝水分离器后,连续运行41天,注入蒸汽的平均质量由81%提高到98%。安装在旋风分离器下游的疏水阀也证实了这一改进(仅相差1.6%)。旋风分离器造成的蒸汽压力和温度损失平均分别为17%和5%。根据旋风分离器的数据和理论计算,可以确定旋风蒸汽分离器平均每天从发生器给出的初始体积流量(41 GPM时为1407水桶/天)中去除227桶水(17%)。在能量方面,为了提高蒸汽质量,旋风分离器将发电机提供的初始能量(527 MMBTU/天)的8% (41 MMBTU/天)作为液态冷凝物去除。通过对被移除的液相的三种处理方案的考虑,确定了将液体直接注入主生产线是处理该流体的最有效方法,因为观察到热水(354°F和21%的闪蒸汽)充当了一个热点,从而改善了石油在管道内的流动性。这种方法还降低了将移走的水运送到处理设施的成本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Steam Additives to Reduce the Steam-Oil Ratio in SAGD: Experimental Analysis, Pilot Design, and Field Application Powering Offshore Installations with Wind Energy Quantification of Phase Behaviour and Physical Properties of Alkane Solvents/CO2/ Water/Heavy Oil Systems under Equilibrium and Nonequilibrium Conditions Profile Ultrasonic Velocity Measurements Performed on Slabbed Core: Implications for High-Resolution Permeability Prediction in Low-Permeability Rocks Holistic Real-Time Drilling Parameters Optimization Delivers Best-in-Class Drilling Performance and Preserves Bit Condition - A Case History from an Integrated Project in the Middle East
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1