Perkembangan dan Karakterisasi Desa-desa Pegunungan Jawa Tengah

Andi Yoga Saputra, Ernan Rustiadi, Wiwiek Rindayati
{"title":"Perkembangan dan Karakterisasi Desa-desa Pegunungan Jawa Tengah","authors":"Andi Yoga Saputra, Ernan Rustiadi, Wiwiek Rindayati","doi":"10.29244/jp2wd.2022.6.1.1-13","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The characteristics of mountain villages are very different from valley villages and plain villages, but socio-economically and environmentally related to each other. This study aims to analyze the level of development of physical facilities in mountain villages, analyze the village development index based on the dimensions of village development, and analyze the components of socio-economic, environmental, and developmental characteristics of mountainous villages in Central Java. Analysis of the level of development of mountainous village physical facilities used skalogram based on PODES 2018 data, village development index based on the dimensions of village development used the Village Index (ID) calculation formula, and analysis of the characteristics of the socio-economic, environmental, and developmental components of mountain villages used Principal Component Analysis (PCA). Results of the analysis of the level of development of the physical facilities of the mountainous villages show that 413 villages (67.81%) of the mountains are in the third hierarchical class (less developed). The category of village development based on the dimensions of development shows that mountain villages are included in the category of developing villages with an average value of ID 54.17. The components that best characterize the characteristics of mountainous villages are the potential for the danger of 21.9%, the availability of secondary school education facilities, health facilities, and the village development level of 16%, the component of trade facilities 5.8. %, the component of the availability of the micro-industry is 13.25%, and the component of the availability of health facilities are 8.8%.","PeriodicalId":355598,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Regional and Rural Development Planning","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Regional and Rural Development Planning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29244/jp2wd.2022.6.1.1-13","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The characteristics of mountain villages are very different from valley villages and plain villages, but socio-economically and environmentally related to each other. This study aims to analyze the level of development of physical facilities in mountain villages, analyze the village development index based on the dimensions of village development, and analyze the components of socio-economic, environmental, and developmental characteristics of mountainous villages in Central Java. Analysis of the level of development of mountainous village physical facilities used skalogram based on PODES 2018 data, village development index based on the dimensions of village development used the Village Index (ID) calculation formula, and analysis of the characteristics of the socio-economic, environmental, and developmental components of mountain villages used Principal Component Analysis (PCA). Results of the analysis of the level of development of the physical facilities of the mountainous villages show that 413 villages (67.81%) of the mountains are in the third hierarchical class (less developed). The category of village development based on the dimensions of development shows that mountain villages are included in the category of developing villages with an average value of ID 54.17. The components that best characterize the characteristics of mountainous villages are the potential for the danger of 21.9%, the availability of secondary school education facilities, health facilities, and the village development level of 16%, the component of trade facilities 5.8. %, the component of the availability of the micro-industry is 13.25%, and the component of the availability of health facilities are 8.8%.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
爪哇中部山脉村庄的发展和描述
山区村落的特征与山谷村落和平原村落有很大的不同,但又相互联系在一起。本研究旨在分析山区村庄物理设施的发展水平,分析基于村庄发展维度的村庄发展指数,分析中爪哇山区村庄的社会经济、环境和发展特征的组成部分。采用基于PODES 2018数据的skalogram分析山地村庄物理设施发展水平,采用基于村庄发展维度的村庄发展指数(village index, ID)计算公式,采用主成分分析法(Principal Component Analysis, PCA)分析山地村庄社会经济、环境和发展要素特征。山区村庄物理设施发展水平分析结果表明,山区有413个村庄(67.81%)处于第三等级(欠发达)。基于发展维度的村庄发展类别显示,山地村庄被纳入发展中村庄的类别,平均ID为54.17。最能体现山地村庄特征的组成部分是潜在危险(21.9%)、中学教育设施、卫生设施的可获得性和村庄发展水平(16%)、贸易设施组成部分(5.8)。其中,微型工业可获得性的组成部分为13.25%,卫生设施可获得性的组成部分为8.8%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Analisis Penentuan Komoditas Unggulan Hortikultura di Kecamatan Way Jepara, Kabupaten Lampung Timur Can Subaltern Exist? Reinterpreting the Issue of Subalternity (Case Study of Blimbingsari Village - Jembrana Regency and Pegayaman Village - Buleleng Regency) Analisis Fungsi Taman-Taman Kota di Kota Bogor Berdasarkan Persepsi Masyarakat Analisis Bencana Longsor akibat Gempa bumi Cianjur 2022 dengan DInSAR Pengaruh Kelerengan terhadap Perkembangan Lahan Terbangun di Kabupaten Serang, Provinsi Banten
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1