An Empirical Study of Dimensionality Reduction Methods for Biometric Recognition

Nittaya Kerdprasop, Ratiporn Chanklan, Anusara Hirunyawanakul, Kittisak Kerdprasop
{"title":"An Empirical Study of Dimensionality Reduction Methods for Biometric Recognition","authors":"Nittaya Kerdprasop, Ratiporn Chanklan, Anusara Hirunyawanakul, Kittisak Kerdprasop","doi":"10.1109/SECTECH.2014.14","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research aims at studying the recognition accuracy and execution time that are affected by different dimensionality reduction methods applied to the biometric image data. We comparatively study the fingerprint, face images, and handwritten signature data that are pre-processed with the two statistical based dimensionality reduction methods: principal component analysis (PCA) and linear discriminant analysis (LDA). The algorithm that has been used to train and recognize the images is support vector machine with linear and polynomial kernel functions. Experimental results showed that the application of LDA dimensionality reduction method before recognizing the image patterns with a linear kernel function of SVM is more accurate and takes less time than the recognition that did not use dimensionality reduction. LDA is a suitable technique for physiological biometrics, whereas PCA is appropriate for the behavioral biometrics. We also found out that only 1% of transformed dimensions is adequate for the accurate recognition of biometric image patterns.","PeriodicalId":159028,"journal":{"name":"2014 7th International Conference on Security Technology","volume":"61 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2014 7th International Conference on Security Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SECTECH.2014.14","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

This research aims at studying the recognition accuracy and execution time that are affected by different dimensionality reduction methods applied to the biometric image data. We comparatively study the fingerprint, face images, and handwritten signature data that are pre-processed with the two statistical based dimensionality reduction methods: principal component analysis (PCA) and linear discriminant analysis (LDA). The algorithm that has been used to train and recognize the images is support vector machine with linear and polynomial kernel functions. Experimental results showed that the application of LDA dimensionality reduction method before recognizing the image patterns with a linear kernel function of SVM is more accurate and takes less time than the recognition that did not use dimensionality reduction. LDA is a suitable technique for physiological biometrics, whereas PCA is appropriate for the behavioral biometrics. We also found out that only 1% of transformed dimensions is adequate for the accurate recognition of biometric image patterns.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
生物特征识别降维方法的实证研究
本研究旨在研究不同降维方法对生物特征图像数据识别精度和执行时间的影响。对比研究了采用主成分分析(PCA)和线性判别分析(LDA)两种基于统计的降维方法预处理的指纹、人脸图像和手写签名数据。用于训练和识别图像的算法是具有线性和多项式核函数的支持向量机。实验结果表明,在SVM的线性核函数图像模式识别前应用LDA降维方法比不使用降维方法的识别更准确、耗时更短。LDA技术适用于生理生物识别,PCA技术适用于行为生物识别。我们还发现,只有1%的变换维度足以准确识别生物特征图像模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
An Analysis of Attacks against Anonymous Communication Networks Mutual Authentication between Ships in the E-Navigation Environment Extending Advanced Evasion Techniques Using Combinatorial Search Security Objectives of Cyber Physical Systems Effectiveness of Port Hopping as a Moving Target Defense
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1