{"title":"Relationship between functional movement performance and health-related physical fitness of male college students","authors":"Yang Hongjie, Wang Yan, Li ShanYun","doi":"10.16835/J.CNKI.1000-9817.2020.12.025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective To analyze the relationship among cardiopulmonary endurance, body composition, flexibility, muscle strength and endurance with functional movement performance of male college students, and to explore the factors associated with the performance of functional movements. Methods A total of 112 male college students were selected, muscle power and flexibility test was based on the national student physical health standard, founctional movement screen created by Cook was used to test founctional movement performance. Results Male college students have poor flexibility, stability and control of functional movements, and high probability of compensatory or asymmetric movements; In-line lunge, trunk stability push-up were positively associated with cardiorespiratory fitness ( r = 0.17, 0.17, P <0.05); hurdle step, shoulder mobility, trunk stability push-up and rotary were negative associated with body composition ( r =-0.17, -0.13, -0.25, -0.22, P <0.05); shoulder mobility, trunk stability push -up and rotary were positively associated with score of standing long jump, trunk stability push-up was positively associated with endurance of deltoid and trapetus as well as endurance of pectoralis major and latissimus dorsi; shoulder mobility was positively associated with score of sit and reach ( r = 0. 17, P < 0. 01). The independent risk factors of functional performance of male college students, hurdle step ( β = -0.02), trunk stability push-up ( β = -0.12) and rotary were body fat rate ( β = -0.03); the protective factors trunk stability push-up were body fat rate ( β = -0.04), VO 2 max ( β = 0.04) and endurance of pectoralis major and latissimus dorsi ( β = 0.03). Conclusion The functional performance of male college students was not optimistic, which could be improved by increasing health-related physical fitness. 【摘要】 目的 分析男大学生心肺耐力、身体成分、柔韧性以及肌肉力量和耐力与功能动作表现的关系, 为探讨影响功能 动作表现的健康体适能要素提供参考。 方法 在江苏省盐城城工学院随机选取112名非体育专业男大学生, 依据《国家学 生体质健康标准》进行肌肉力量和柔韧性测试, 并进行Cook等的功能动作筛查 (Functional Movement Screen, FMS)测试, 所 得数据进行描述性统计、相关分析以及多因素回归分析。 结果 男大学生功能动作的灵活性、稳定性和控制性较差, 代偿 性或不对称性动作发生概率较高;功能动作直线弓箭步、躯干稳定性俯卧撑与VO 2 max呈正相关 ( r 值分别为0.17,0.17, 值均<0.05);跨栏步 (r = -0.17)、肩部灵活性 (r = -0.13)、躯干稳定性俯卧撑( r = -0.25)、旋转稳定性 (r = -0.22)与体脂率呈 负相关;肩部灵活性 (r = 0.14)、躯干稳定性俯卧撑( r = 0.22)、旋转稳定性( r = 0.16)与立定跳远成绩呈正相关, 躯干稳定性 俯卧撑与三角肌、斜方肌耐力( r = 0.15)及胸大肌、背阔肌耐力( r = 0.19)呈正相关;肩部灵活性与坐位体前屈成绩( r = 0.17) 呈正相关。体脂率为男性大学生总体功能动作表现 (P = -0.12)、跨栏步 (P = -0.02)和旋转稳定性 (P =-0.03)的影响因素, 体脂率 ( β = -0.04)、 VO 2 max( β = 0.04)以及胸大肌、背阔肌耐力 ( β = 0.03)为躯干稳定性俯卧撑的影响因素。 结论 男性大 学生功能动作表现不容乐观, 有必要通过提高健康体适能水平加以改善。","PeriodicalId":106801,"journal":{"name":"Chinese Journal of School Health","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chinese Journal of School Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.16835/J.CNKI.1000-9817.2020.12.025","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective To analyze the relationship among cardiopulmonary endurance, body composition, flexibility, muscle strength and endurance with functional movement performance of male college students, and to explore the factors associated with the performance of functional movements. Methods A total of 112 male college students were selected, muscle power and flexibility test was based on the national student physical health standard, founctional movement screen created by Cook was used to test founctional movement performance. Results Male college students have poor flexibility, stability and control of functional movements, and high probability of compensatory or asymmetric movements; In-line lunge, trunk stability push-up were positively associated with cardiorespiratory fitness ( r = 0.17, 0.17, P <0.05); hurdle step, shoulder mobility, trunk stability push-up and rotary were negative associated with body composition ( r =-0.17, -0.13, -0.25, -0.22, P <0.05); shoulder mobility, trunk stability push -up and rotary were positively associated with score of standing long jump, trunk stability push-up was positively associated with endurance of deltoid and trapetus as well as endurance of pectoralis major and latissimus dorsi; shoulder mobility was positively associated with score of sit and reach ( r = 0. 17, P < 0. 01). The independent risk factors of functional performance of male college students, hurdle step ( β = -0.02), trunk stability push-up ( β = -0.12) and rotary were body fat rate ( β = -0.03); the protective factors trunk stability push-up were body fat rate ( β = -0.04), VO 2 max ( β = 0.04) and endurance of pectoralis major and latissimus dorsi ( β = 0.03). Conclusion The functional performance of male college students was not optimistic, which could be improved by increasing health-related physical fitness. 【摘要】 目的 分析男大学生心肺耐力、身体成分、柔韧性以及肌肉力量和耐力与功能动作表现的关系, 为探讨影响功能 动作表现的健康体适能要素提供参考。 方法 在江苏省盐城城工学院随机选取112名非体育专业男大学生, 依据《国家学 生体质健康标准》进行肌肉力量和柔韧性测试, 并进行Cook等的功能动作筛查 (Functional Movement Screen, FMS)测试, 所 得数据进行描述性统计、相关分析以及多因素回归分析。 结果 男大学生功能动作的灵活性、稳定性和控制性较差, 代偿 性或不对称性动作发生概率较高;功能动作直线弓箭步、躯干稳定性俯卧撑与VO 2 max呈正相关 ( r 值分别为0.17,0.17, 值均<0.05);跨栏步 (r = -0.17)、肩部灵活性 (r = -0.13)、躯干稳定性俯卧撑( r = -0.25)、旋转稳定性 (r = -0.22)与体脂率呈 负相关;肩部灵活性 (r = 0.14)、躯干稳定性俯卧撑( r = 0.22)、旋转稳定性( r = 0.16)与立定跳远成绩呈正相关, 躯干稳定性 俯卧撑与三角肌、斜方肌耐力( r = 0.15)及胸大肌、背阔肌耐力( r = 0.19)呈正相关;肩部灵活性与坐位体前屈成绩( r = 0.17) 呈正相关。体脂率为男性大学生总体功能动作表现 (P = -0.12)、跨栏步 (P = -0.02)和旋转稳定性 (P =-0.03)的影响因素, 体脂率 ( β = -0.04)、 VO 2 max( β = 0.04)以及胸大肌、背阔肌耐力 ( β = 0.03)为躯干稳定性俯卧撑的影响因素。 结论 男性大 学生功能动作表现不容乐观, 有必要通过提高健康体适能水平加以改善。