Relationship between functional movement performance and health-related physical fitness of male college students

Yang Hongjie, Wang Yan, Li ShanYun
{"title":"Relationship between functional movement performance and health-related physical fitness of male college students","authors":"Yang Hongjie, Wang Yan, Li ShanYun","doi":"10.16835/J.CNKI.1000-9817.2020.12.025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective To analyze the relationship among cardiopulmonary endurance, body composition, flexibility, muscle strength and endurance with functional movement performance of male college students, and to explore the factors associated with the performance of functional movements. Methods A total of 112 male college students were selected, muscle power and flexibility test was based on the national student physical health standard, founctional movement screen created by Cook was used to test founctional movement performance. Results Male college students have poor flexibility, stability and control of functional movements, and high probability of compensatory or asymmetric movements; In-line lunge, trunk stability push-up were positively associated with cardiorespiratory fitness ( r = 0.17, 0.17, P <0.05); hurdle step, shoulder mobility, trunk stability push-up and rotary were negative associated with body composition ( r =-0.17, -0.13, -0.25, -0.22, P <0.05); shoulder mobility, trunk stability push -up and rotary were positively associated with score of standing long jump, trunk stability push-up was positively associated with endurance of deltoid and trapetus as well as endurance of pectoralis major and latissimus dorsi; shoulder mobility was positively associated with score of sit and reach ( r = 0. 17, P < 0. 01). The independent risk factors of functional performance of male college students, hurdle step ( β = -0.02), trunk stability push-up ( β = -0.12) and rotary were body fat rate ( β = -0.03); the protective factors trunk stability push-up were body fat rate ( β = -0.04), VO 2 max ( β = 0.04) and endurance of pectoralis major and latissimus dorsi ( β = 0.03). Conclusion The functional performance of male college students was not optimistic, which could be improved by increasing health-related physical fitness. 【摘要】 目的 分析男大学生心肺耐力、身体成分、柔韧性以及肌肉力量和耐力与功能动作表现的关系, 为探讨影响功能 动作表现的健康体适能要素提供参考。 方法 在江苏省盐城城工学院随机选取112名非体育专业男大学生, 依据《国家学 生体质健康标准》进行肌肉力量和柔韧性测试, 并进行Cook等的功能动作筛查 (Functional Movement Screen, FMS)测试, 所 得数据进行描述性统计、相关分析以及多因素回归分析。 结果 男大学生功能动作的灵活性、稳定性和控制性较差, 代偿 性或不对称性动作发生概率较高;功能动作直线弓箭步、躯干稳定性俯卧撑与VO 2 max呈正相关 ( r 值分别为0.17,0.17, 值均<0.05);跨栏步 (r = -0.17)、肩部灵活性 (r = -0.13)、躯干稳定性俯卧撑( r = -0.25)、旋转稳定性 (r = -0.22)与体脂率呈 负相关;肩部灵活性 (r = 0.14)、躯干稳定性俯卧撑( r = 0.22)、旋转稳定性( r = 0.16)与立定跳远成绩呈正相关, 躯干稳定性 俯卧撑与三角肌、斜方肌耐力( r = 0.15)及胸大肌、背阔肌耐力( r = 0.19)呈正相关;肩部灵活性与坐位体前屈成绩( r = 0.17) 呈正相关。体脂率为男性大学生总体功能动作表现 (P = -0.12)、跨栏步 (P = -0.02)和旋转稳定性 (P =-0.03)的影响因素, 体脂率 ( β = -0.04)、 VO 2 max( β = 0.04)以及胸大肌、背阔肌耐力 ( β = 0.03)为躯干稳定性俯卧撑的影响因素。 结论 男性大 学生功能动作表现不容乐观, 有必要通过提高健康体适能水平加以改善。","PeriodicalId":106801,"journal":{"name":"Chinese Journal of School Health","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chinese Journal of School Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.16835/J.CNKI.1000-9817.2020.12.025","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective To analyze the relationship among cardiopulmonary endurance, body composition, flexibility, muscle strength and endurance with functional movement performance of male college students, and to explore the factors associated with the performance of functional movements. Methods A total of 112 male college students were selected, muscle power and flexibility test was based on the national student physical health standard, founctional movement screen created by Cook was used to test founctional movement performance. Results Male college students have poor flexibility, stability and control of functional movements, and high probability of compensatory or asymmetric movements; In-line lunge, trunk stability push-up were positively associated with cardiorespiratory fitness ( r = 0.17, 0.17, P <0.05); hurdle step, shoulder mobility, trunk stability push-up and rotary were negative associated with body composition ( r =-0.17, -0.13, -0.25, -0.22, P <0.05); shoulder mobility, trunk stability push -up and rotary were positively associated with score of standing long jump, trunk stability push-up was positively associated with endurance of deltoid and trapetus as well as endurance of pectoralis major and latissimus dorsi; shoulder mobility was positively associated with score of sit and reach ( r = 0. 17, P < 0. 01). The independent risk factors of functional performance of male college students, hurdle step ( β = -0.02), trunk stability push-up ( β = -0.12) and rotary were body fat rate ( β = -0.03); the protective factors trunk stability push-up were body fat rate ( β = -0.04), VO 2 max ( β = 0.04) and endurance of pectoralis major and latissimus dorsi ( β = 0.03). Conclusion The functional performance of male college students was not optimistic, which could be improved by increasing health-related physical fitness. 【摘要】 目的 分析男大学生心肺耐力、身体成分、柔韧性以及肌肉力量和耐力与功能动作表现的关系, 为探讨影响功能 动作表现的健康体适能要素提供参考。 方法 在江苏省盐城城工学院随机选取112名非体育专业男大学生, 依据《国家学 生体质健康标准》进行肌肉力量和柔韧性测试, 并进行Cook等的功能动作筛查 (Functional Movement Screen, FMS)测试, 所 得数据进行描述性统计、相关分析以及多因素回归分析。 结果 男大学生功能动作的灵活性、稳定性和控制性较差, 代偿 性或不对称性动作发生概率较高;功能动作直线弓箭步、躯干稳定性俯卧撑与VO 2 max呈正相关 ( r 值分别为0.17,0.17, 值均<0.05);跨栏步 (r = -0.17)、肩部灵活性 (r = -0.13)、躯干稳定性俯卧撑( r = -0.25)、旋转稳定性 (r = -0.22)与体脂率呈 负相关;肩部灵活性 (r = 0.14)、躯干稳定性俯卧撑( r = 0.22)、旋转稳定性( r = 0.16)与立定跳远成绩呈正相关, 躯干稳定性 俯卧撑与三角肌、斜方肌耐力( r = 0.15)及胸大肌、背阔肌耐力( r = 0.19)呈正相关;肩部灵活性与坐位体前屈成绩( r = 0.17) 呈正相关。体脂率为男性大学生总体功能动作表现 (P = -0.12)、跨栏步 (P = -0.02)和旋转稳定性 (P =-0.03)的影响因素, 体脂率 ( β = -0.04)、 VO 2 max( β = 0.04)以及胸大肌、背阔肌耐力 ( β = 0.03)为躯干稳定性俯卧撑的影响因素。 结论 男性大 学生功能动作表现不容乐观, 有必要通过提高健康体适能水平加以改善。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
男大学生功能性运动表现与健康体质的关系
目的分析男大学生心肺耐力、体成分、柔韧性、肌力、耐力与功能性动作成绩的关系,探讨影响功能性动作成绩的因素。方法选取112名男大学生,依据国家学生体质健康标准进行肌肉力量和柔韧性测试,采用Cook设计的功能运动量表进行功能运动表现测试。结果男大学生功能性动作的灵活性、稳定性和控制力较差,代偿性或不对称动作的概率较大;直线弓步、躯干稳定性俯卧撑与心肺健康呈正相关(r = 0.17、0.17,P <0.05);跨栏步、肩部活动度、躯干稳定性俯卧撑和旋转与身体构成呈负相关(r =-0.17, -0.13, -0.25, -0.22, P <0.05);肩部活动度、躯干稳定性俯卧撑和旋转与立定跳远得分呈正相关,躯干稳定性俯卧撑与三角肌、斜肌耐力、胸大肌、背阔肌耐力呈正相关;肩关节活动度与坐下和伸入得分呈正相关(r = 0)。17, p < 0。01). 男大学生功能表现、跨栏步(β = -0.02)、躯干稳定性俯卧撑(β = -0.12)、旋转的独立危险因素为体脂率(β = -0.03);躯干稳定性俯卧撑的保护因子为体脂率(β = -0.04)、最大VO (β = 0.04)和胸大肌、背阔肌耐力(β = 0.03)。结论男大学生的功能表现不容乐观,可通过增强健康体质来改善。【摘要】 目的 分析男大学生心肺耐力、身体成分、柔韧性以及肌肉力量和耐力与功能动作表现的关系, 为探讨影响功能 动作表现的健康体适能要素提供参考。 方法在江苏省盐城城工学院随机选取112名非体育专业男大学生,依据“国家学生体质健康标准”进行肌肉力量和柔韧性测试,并进行库克等的功能动作筛查(屏幕功能运动,FMS)测试,所得数据进行描述性统计,相关分析以及多因素回归分析。结果男大学生功能动作的灵活性,稳定性和控制性较差,代偿性或不对称性动作发生概率较高,功能动作直线弓箭步,躯干稳定性俯卧撑与签证官2马克斯呈正相关(r值分别为0.17,0.17,值均< 0.05);跨栏步(r = -0.17),肩部灵活性(r = -0.13),躯干稳定性俯卧撑(r = -0.25),旋转稳定性(r = -0.22)与体脂率呈负相关;肩部灵活性(r = 0.14),躯干稳定性俯卧撑(r = 0.22),旋转稳定性(r = 0.16)与立定跳远成绩呈正相关,躯干稳定性俯卧撑与三角肌,斜方肌耐力(r = 0.15)及胸大肌、背阔肌耐力(r = 0.19)呈正相关;肩部灵活性与坐位体前屈成绩(r = 0.17)呈正相关。体脂率为男性大学生总体功能动作表现(P = -0.12),跨栏步(P = -0.02)和旋转稳定性(P = -0.03)的影响因素,体脂率(β= -0.04),签证官2马克斯(β= 0.04)以及胸大肌、背阔肌耐力(β= 0.03)为躯干稳定性俯卧撑的影响因素。结论 男性大 学生功能动作表现不容乐观, 有必要通过提高健康体适能水平加以改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Impact of violent video games and other factors on aggressive behavior of junior high school students in Shanghai Analysis of risk factors for vasovagal syncope in children Prevalence of eating out and its association with overweight and obesity among children and adolescents in Hebei Province Psychoactive substance abuse and associated factors among middle school students in Liaoning Relationship between classroom lighting and poor vision of students in primary and secondary schools in Tianjin
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1