An Overview of Implant Stability Measurement

E. Kazazoğlu, Zeynep Ozkurt Kayhan
{"title":"An Overview of Implant Stability Measurement","authors":"E. Kazazoğlu, Zeynep Ozkurt Kayhan","doi":"10.32474/MADOHC.2018.02.000149","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"With Branemark’s development of implant systems in the 1960’s, dental implants have become a reliable treatment option for tooth loss [1]. One of the most important criteria for implant success is osseointegration [2]. Osseointegration is defined as the direct and functional connection between the implant and the bone surface [3]. Osseointegration also determines implant stability that is occurred in two different stages; primer and secondary stability [4]. Primer stability is related to the mechanical connection of the implant to the cortical bone. Sekonder stability is the biological stability between bone regeneration and remodeling [5]. The majority of the clinicians think that the loading should be applied after the direct relationship between the implant and the bone is obtained [6]. Mobility in implants is considered as a sign of a problem with osseointegration. For this reason, the lack of mobility and the fact that the implant-bone connection can be measured before loading is of great importance for the success of the implants in the future [7]. Although there are several methods of measuring implant stability such as radiographic analysis, insertion torque test, reverse torque tests, shear torque tests, percussion test, periotest and resonance frequency analysis [8-11], none of them provide established measurement standarts yet [12]. However, simple and non-invasive methods are recommended for measuring implant stability and osseointegration [8]. In this mini-review, all methods for dental implant stability measurement and recent developments are discussed.","PeriodicalId":121604,"journal":{"name":"Modern Approaches in Dentistry and Oral Health Care","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Modern Approaches in Dentistry and Oral Health Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32474/MADOHC.2018.02.000149","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

With Branemark’s development of implant systems in the 1960’s, dental implants have become a reliable treatment option for tooth loss [1]. One of the most important criteria for implant success is osseointegration [2]. Osseointegration is defined as the direct and functional connection between the implant and the bone surface [3]. Osseointegration also determines implant stability that is occurred in two different stages; primer and secondary stability [4]. Primer stability is related to the mechanical connection of the implant to the cortical bone. Sekonder stability is the biological stability between bone regeneration and remodeling [5]. The majority of the clinicians think that the loading should be applied after the direct relationship between the implant and the bone is obtained [6]. Mobility in implants is considered as a sign of a problem with osseointegration. For this reason, the lack of mobility and the fact that the implant-bone connection can be measured before loading is of great importance for the success of the implants in the future [7]. Although there are several methods of measuring implant stability such as radiographic analysis, insertion torque test, reverse torque tests, shear torque tests, percussion test, periotest and resonance frequency analysis [8-11], none of them provide established measurement standarts yet [12]. However, simple and non-invasive methods are recommended for measuring implant stability and osseointegration [8]. In this mini-review, all methods for dental implant stability measurement and recent developments are discussed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
种植体稳定性测量综述
随着Branemark在20世纪60年代种植体系统的发展,牙科种植体已成为牙齿脱落bbb的可靠治疗选择。种植体成功的最重要标准之一是骨整合[2]。骨整合被定义为种植体与骨表面[3]之间的直接和功能性连接。骨整合也决定种植体的稳定性,这发生在两个不同的阶段;引物和次级稳定性[4]。引物稳定性与植入物与皮质骨的机械连接有关。Sekonder稳定性是指骨再生和骨重塑之间的生物稳定性。大多数临床医生认为应在获得种植体与骨的直接关系后进行加载[6]。移动性被认为是骨整合问题的标志。因此,缺乏可移动性以及在装载前可以测量种植体与骨的连接对未来种植体的成功至关重要。虽然测量种植体稳定性的方法有多种,如放射学分析、插入扭矩测试、反向扭矩测试、剪切扭矩测试、冲击测试、周测和共振频率分析[8-11],但它们都没有提供既定的测量标准[8-11]。然而,推荐使用简单且无创的方法来测量种植体稳定性和骨整合bb0。在这篇简短的综述中,讨论了所有测量种植体稳定性的方法和最近的发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The contribution of fatigue on the transition from acute to chronic painful temporomandibular disorders, and its persistence: a prospective 3-month cohort study Perception of Cameroonian Parents about Orthodontic Tooth Positioner Advantages and Precautions of Universal Shade Composite Resin Epidemiological Aspects of Dental Anomalies in Moroccan Patients with Rare Diseases. Cultural Practice of Dental Health Among South Asians
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1