An Agenda for Future Research in Forensic Economics: Topics from NAFE Surveys and Additional Proposals

M. Brookshire, Frank L. Slesnick
{"title":"An Agenda for Future Research in Forensic Economics: Topics from NAFE Surveys and Additional Proposals","authors":"M. Brookshire, Frank L. Slesnick","doi":"10.5085/jfe-481","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This paper provides suggestions for future research by forensic economists, focused upon personal injury and wrongful death cases. The paper is particially based on questions from our 10 surveys of NAFE members over 25 years, in which members were directly asked to rank future areas of forensic economic research in importance. We discuss answers to important questions where there is little or no consensus among respondents, and where consensus is reasonably clear, as this may influence topics chosen for future research. We also discuss research topics by drawing on our own experience as forensic economists.","PeriodicalId":265321,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Forensic Economics","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Forensic Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5085/jfe-481","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper provides suggestions for future research by forensic economists, focused upon personal injury and wrongful death cases. The paper is particially based on questions from our 10 surveys of NAFE members over 25 years, in which members were directly asked to rank future areas of forensic economic research in importance. We discuss answers to important questions where there is little or no consensus among respondents, and where consensus is reasonably clear, as this may influence topics chosen for future research. We also discuss research topics by drawing on our own experience as forensic economists.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
司法经济学未来研究的议程:来自NAFE调查的主题和其他建议
这篇论文部分基于我们在过去25年中对NAFE成员进行的10次调查中的问题,在这些调查中,成员们被直接要求对未来法医经济学研究领域的重要性进行排名。我们讨论在受访者中很少或没有共识的重要问题的答案,以及共识相当明确的地方,因为这可能会影响为未来研究选择的主题。我们还通过借鉴自己作为法医经济学家的经验来讨论研究课题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Forecasting Prices for Components of the Medical Cost Index Two-Step Medical Inflation Forecasts: Econometric Performance and Related Issues Worklife Expectancies Two Plus Years after the Start of the Covid-19 Pandemic Corrigendum to “Use of Healthy Life Expectancy to Estimate Future Provision of Household and Personal Services” Estimating Personal Consumption Rates for Husbands and Wives: A Comparison of Income-Strata and Microdata Models
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1