{"title":"Narrative, Rhetoric, and the Origins of Logic","authors":"Apostolos Doxiadis","doi":"10.1353/STW.0.0015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In Vom Mythos zum Logos (1940), a book that became emblematic of a now rather passe, idealized view of ancient Greek culture, Wilhelm Nestle proposed that the greatest achievement of the Greeks was the abandonment of the mythological interpretation of the world in favor of a rationalist model, developed with the tools of analytic thinking. Nestle’s account has since been supplanted by newer approaches, which found a lot more than myth in mythos and a lot less than pure reason in logos. However, if we restrict the meaning of his two terms and read mythos simply as “story” and logos as “logic,” Nestle’s catchphrase takes us back to a seminal event in cultural history, an event that has not been examined with the attention it deserves. More specifi cally, this essay argues that what we call, for short, “the birth of logic” can best be understood not as the abandonment of the narrative mode","PeriodicalId":424412,"journal":{"name":"Storyworlds: A Journal of Narrative Studies","volume":"80 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Storyworlds: A Journal of Narrative Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/STW.0.0015","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4
Abstract
In Vom Mythos zum Logos (1940), a book that became emblematic of a now rather passe, idealized view of ancient Greek culture, Wilhelm Nestle proposed that the greatest achievement of the Greeks was the abandonment of the mythological interpretation of the world in favor of a rationalist model, developed with the tools of analytic thinking. Nestle’s account has since been supplanted by newer approaches, which found a lot more than myth in mythos and a lot less than pure reason in logos. However, if we restrict the meaning of his two terms and read mythos simply as “story” and logos as “logic,” Nestle’s catchphrase takes us back to a seminal event in cultural history, an event that has not been examined with the attention it deserves. More specifi cally, this essay argues that what we call, for short, “the birth of logic” can best be understood not as the abandonment of the narrative mode
威廉·奈斯特(Wilhelm Nestle)在1940年出版的《理性的神话》(Vom Mythos zum Logos)一书中提出,希腊人最伟大的成就是放弃了对世界的神话解释,转而采用理性主义模式,并利用分析思维的工具发展起来。这本书如今已成为古希腊文化一种相当过时的理想化观点的象征。雀巢的说法后来被更新的方法所取代,这些方法在神话中发现了更多的神话,在商标中发现了更少的纯粹理性。然而,如果我们限制他的两个术语的含义,把神话简单地理解为“故事”,把标志理解为“逻辑”,雀巢的口号就把我们带回到文化史上的一个重大事件,一个没有得到应有关注的事件。更具体地说,本文认为,我们所谓的“逻辑的诞生”最好不要理解为对叙事模式的放弃