Maryam Masoumi, I. de Miguel, R. J. D. Barroso, L. Ruiz, Fabrizio Brasca, Gianluca Rizzi, N. Merayo, J. Aguado, P. Fernández, R. Lorenzo, E. Abril
{"title":"Dynamic Online VNF Placement with Different Protection Schemes in a MEC Environment","authors":"Maryam Masoumi, I. de Miguel, R. J. D. Barroso, L. Ruiz, Fabrizio Brasca, Gianluca Rizzi, N. Merayo, J. Aguado, P. Fernández, R. Lorenzo, E. Abril","doi":"10.1109/ITNAC55475.2022.9998347","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Multi-access Edge Computing (MEC) architecture is made up of geographically distributed edge servers so that computing capabilities are provisioned at the network edge, close to the end users. Network Function Virtualization (NFV), when combined with MEC, provides network services in the form of Service Function Chains (SFC) with low latency. In the design of NFV-based 5G networks, the trade-off between the cost of resource deployment and the effective provisioning of services must be considered. In this work, we analyze the impact of having different MEC locations when considering the provision of SFCs in a dynamic scenario (and thus also address VNF placement). In order to deal with infrastructure failures, it is of great importance to employ robust and resilient network strategies. To safeguard SFCs against failures, various protection techniques can be applied. We use two protection methods, namely, dedicated VNF protection and shared VNF protection, under the assumption of single network failures. The operational performances of different approaches are evaluated in terms of blocking ratio and end-to-end delay, both for the whole network and for different services, and we analyze whether it is better to distribute computing servers among a few MEC sites or among a higher number.","PeriodicalId":205731,"journal":{"name":"2022 32nd International Telecommunication Networks and Applications Conference (ITNAC)","volume":"47 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 32nd International Telecommunication Networks and Applications Conference (ITNAC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ITNAC55475.2022.9998347","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
The Multi-access Edge Computing (MEC) architecture is made up of geographically distributed edge servers so that computing capabilities are provisioned at the network edge, close to the end users. Network Function Virtualization (NFV), when combined with MEC, provides network services in the form of Service Function Chains (SFC) with low latency. In the design of NFV-based 5G networks, the trade-off between the cost of resource deployment and the effective provisioning of services must be considered. In this work, we analyze the impact of having different MEC locations when considering the provision of SFCs in a dynamic scenario (and thus also address VNF placement). In order to deal with infrastructure failures, it is of great importance to employ robust and resilient network strategies. To safeguard SFCs against failures, various protection techniques can be applied. We use two protection methods, namely, dedicated VNF protection and shared VNF protection, under the assumption of single network failures. The operational performances of different approaches are evaluated in terms of blocking ratio and end-to-end delay, both for the whole network and for different services, and we analyze whether it is better to distribute computing servers among a few MEC sites or among a higher number.
多访问边缘计算(MEC)架构由地理上分布的边缘服务器组成,以便在靠近最终用户的网络边缘提供计算能力。NFV (Network Function Virtualization)与MEC技术相结合,以SFC (Service Function Chains)的形式提供低时延的网络服务。在基于nfv的5G网络设计中,必须考虑资源部署成本与业务有效提供之间的权衡。在这项工作中,我们分析了在动态场景中考虑提供sfc时拥有不同MEC位置的影响(从而也解决了VNF的放置问题)。为了处理基础设施故障,采用鲁棒性和弹性的网络策略是非常重要的。为了防止sfc发生故障,可以采用各种保护技术。在单网络故障的假设下,我们采用专用VNF保护和共享VNF保护两种保护方式。从阻塞率和端到端延迟两个方面对不同方法的运行性能进行了评估,无论是对于整个网络还是不同的服务,我们分析了在几个MEC站点之间分配计算服务器更好还是在更多的MEC站点之间更好。