DIFFERENCES IN MUSIC PREFERENCES BETWEEN MUSICIANS AND NON-MUSICIANS

Ana Jovančević, N. Milicevic, D. Zdravić-Mihailović
{"title":"DIFFERENCES IN MUSIC PREFERENCES BETWEEN MUSICIANS AND NON-MUSICIANS","authors":"Ana Jovančević, N. Milicevic, D. Zdravić-Mihailović","doi":"10.22190/FUVAM1901031J","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this research was to check potential differences in music preferences between musicians and non-musicians. Music preferences were evinced by a short test on the topic (STOMP-R: Rentfrow & Gosling 2003), of the four types of music: Reflexive and Complex, Intense and Rebellious, Upbeat and Conventional, Energetic and Rhythmic. A sample of 209 students from the University of Niš (M=75; F=134), 112 non-musicians and 97 of musicians, were asked to give their opinion. The results of the t-test showed that there are differences between musicians and non-musicians as far as the preferences for one type of music or another is concerned. Statistically significant differences were found for the Reflexive and Complex music (p=.000), as well as for the Upbeat and Conventional music (p=.001). All statistically significant differences were in favor of the musicians. These results show that musicians prefer Reflexive and Complex as well as Upbeat and Conventional music, while differences don’t exist for the remaining two types of music. On the other hand, when it comes to differences in the preference for Upbeat and Conventional music, they can be attributed only to female subsample, so only female musicians differ from female non-musicians when it comes to preference for this type of music (p=.001), while male musicians don’t differ from male non-musicians, on the preference for thins genre (p=.213).","PeriodicalId":297431,"journal":{"name":"Facta Universitatis, Series: Visual Arts and Music","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Facta Universitatis, Series: Visual Arts and Music","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22190/FUVAM1901031J","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

The aim of this research was to check potential differences in music preferences between musicians and non-musicians. Music preferences were evinced by a short test on the topic (STOMP-R: Rentfrow & Gosling 2003), of the four types of music: Reflexive and Complex, Intense and Rebellious, Upbeat and Conventional, Energetic and Rhythmic. A sample of 209 students from the University of Niš (M=75; F=134), 112 non-musicians and 97 of musicians, were asked to give their opinion. The results of the t-test showed that there are differences between musicians and non-musicians as far as the preferences for one type of music or another is concerned. Statistically significant differences were found for the Reflexive and Complex music (p=.000), as well as for the Upbeat and Conventional music (p=.001). All statistically significant differences were in favor of the musicians. These results show that musicians prefer Reflexive and Complex as well as Upbeat and Conventional music, while differences don’t exist for the remaining two types of music. On the other hand, when it comes to differences in the preference for Upbeat and Conventional music, they can be attributed only to female subsample, so only female musicians differ from female non-musicians when it comes to preference for this type of music (p=.001), while male musicians don’t differ from male non-musicians, on the preference for thins genre (p=.213).
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
音乐家和非音乐家之间音乐偏好的差异
这项研究的目的是检查音乐家和非音乐家之间在音乐偏好上的潜在差异。一个关于这个主题的简短测试(STOMP-R: Rentfrow & Gosling 2003)证明了音乐偏好,四种类型的音乐:反思和复杂,强烈和叛逆,乐观和传统,精力充沛和有节奏。尼什大学209名学生样本(M=75;F=134), 112名非音乐家和97名音乐家被要求给出他们的意见。t检验的结果表明,就对一种音乐或另一种音乐的偏好而言,音乐家和非音乐家之间存在差异。反身音乐和复杂音乐(p=.000)以及欢快音乐和传统音乐(p=.001)在统计上有显著差异。所有统计上的显著差异都有利于音乐家。这些结果表明,音乐家更喜欢反思和复杂以及乐观和传统音乐,而其余两种类型的音乐不存在差异。另一方面,当涉及到对乐观和传统音乐的偏好差异时,它们只能归因于女性子样本,因此只有女性音乐家在对这种类型的音乐的偏好方面与女性非音乐家不同(p=.001),而男性音乐家与男性非音乐家在对这种类型的偏好方面没有差异(p=.213)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
IDIOSYNCRATIC ELEMENTS IN MUSIC-RELATED GESTURE-SOUND RELATIONSHIPS: A HINDUSTANI DUET PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS TREATMENT OF THE POETIC TEXT OF CRNJANSKI AND CHARACTERISTICS OF THE HARMONIC LANGUAGE IN THE SUMATRA SONG BY SVETISLAV BOŽIĆ METHODS FOR TEACHING HARMONY AND COUNTERPOINT IN SECONDARY MUSIC SCHOOLS IN THE REPUBLIC OF SERBIA SEMIOTICS OF FILM / SEMIOTICS OF FILM MUSIC THE ROLE OF FINGERING IN CREATING MUSIC ON THE PIANO
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1