Clause types and speech acts in speech to children

Anissa Zaitsu, J. Wehbe, V. Hacquard, J. Lidz
{"title":"Clause types and speech acts in speech to children","authors":"Anissa Zaitsu, J. Wehbe, V. Hacquard, J. Lidz","doi":"10.3765/elm.1.4886","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The question of how and when children learn to associate clause type with its canonical function, or speech act, is currently unknown. It is widely observed that declaratives tend to result in assertions, interrogatives in questions, and imperatives in requests. Although such canonical links between clause type and speech acts are principled, they are known to be defeasible. In this corpus study, we investigate how parents talk to their children in the first years of life, and ask how their input might support this mapping, and to what extent it might pose difficulties. We find that the expected link between clause type and speech act is robust in the input, particularly between declaratives and assertions, both of which also occur most frequently. In addition, the non-canonical mappings that do occur are characterized formally, e.g., non-interrogative questions nearly always exhibit rising prosody, and non-imperative requests often contain a modal.","PeriodicalId":154565,"journal":{"name":"Experiments in Linguistic Meaning","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Experiments in Linguistic Meaning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3765/elm.1.4886","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The question of how and when children learn to associate clause type with its canonical function, or speech act, is currently unknown. It is widely observed that declaratives tend to result in assertions, interrogatives in questions, and imperatives in requests. Although such canonical links between clause type and speech acts are principled, they are known to be defeasible. In this corpus study, we investigate how parents talk to their children in the first years of life, and ask how their input might support this mapping, and to what extent it might pose difficulties. We find that the expected link between clause type and speech act is robust in the input, particularly between declaratives and assertions, both of which also occur most frequently. In addition, the non-canonical mappings that do occur are characterized formally, e.g., non-interrogative questions nearly always exhibit rising prosody, and non-imperative requests often contain a modal.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对儿童讲话中的子句类型和言语行为
儿童如何以及何时学会将子句类型与其规范功能或言语行为联系起来的问题目前尚不清楚。人们普遍观察到,陈述句倾向于导致断言、疑问句和请求命令式。尽管这种条款类型和言语行为之间的规范联系是有原则的,但众所周知,它们是不可行的。在这个语料库研究中,我们调查了父母在生命的最初几年是如何与他们的孩子交谈的,并询问他们的输入如何支持这种映射,以及在多大程度上可能造成困难。我们发现,在输入中,子句类型和言语行为之间的预期联系是稳健的,特别是在陈述句和断言之间,这两者也最常发生。此外,确实发生的非规范映射具有正式的特征,例如,非疑问句几乎总是呈现上升韵律,非命令式请求通常包含模态。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The rise and particularly fall of presuppositions: Evidence from duality in universals Reading times show effects of contextual complexity and uncertainty in comprehension of German universal quantifiers Five degrees of (non)sense: Investigating the connection between bullshit receptivity and susceptibility to semantic illusions Real-time processing of indexical and generic expressions: Insights from, and implications for, COVID-related public health messages Semantics of Non-Doxastic Attitude Ascriptions from Experimental Perspective
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1