Triple Therapy Pathways: A Multi-Country, Retrospective Observational Study in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)

J. Quint, C. O'Leary, A. Venerus, M. Myland, Nicholas Hudson, U. Holmgren, P. Varghese, H. Richter, G. Bizouard, C. Cabrera
{"title":"Triple Therapy Pathways: A Multi-Country, Retrospective Observational Study in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)","authors":"J. Quint, C. O'Leary, A. Venerus, M. Myland, Nicholas Hudson, U. Holmgren, P. Varghese, H. Richter, G. Bizouard, C. Cabrera","doi":"10.1183/13993003.congress-2019.oa5153","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Maintenance treatment in COPD recommends triple therapy (TT), often following use of mono-or dual-therapy. We explored how pathways to TT vary across countries. Aims and Objectives: We investigated the proportion of patients on TT relative to the timing of their COPD diagnosis and the treatment pathway to TT including the time from diagnosis to initiation of TT and adherence. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was performed using anonymised patient-level data from UK, France, Germany, Italy, and Australia from 01/01/2005 to 01/05/2016. Patients were included if their first TT regimen was recorded during this period and they had ≥12 months data pre-index (COPD diagnosis). The proportion of patients on TT before COPD diagnosis was also determined. Treatment pathways and time to TT initiation following index were evaluated. Adherence to TT was estimated using proportion of days covered. Results: Overall 130,729 eligible patients were included. Mean age at diagnosis ranged from 63.4 (SD:10.4) years [pneumologist-treated in Germany] to 69.8 (9.9) years [Italy]. Time to TT ranged from median 16.9 months in Australia (IQR: 5.7 – 36.2) to 42.5 months in the UK (IQR: 13.9 -87.4). TT initiated first formed the largest treatment pathway (7.5% in UK to 17.1% in France). In meta-analyses of patients across all countries, 20.4% (95% CI: 13.8-29.1%) of patients initiated TT prior to COPD diagnosis. Estimated adherence was >80% in all countries during the time the patient was persistent with TT. Conclusions: Diverse patient pathways to TT were observed both between and within countries, many of which do not align with COPD treatment recommendations.","PeriodicalId":432006,"journal":{"name":"General practice and primary care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"General practice and primary care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.congress-2019.oa5153","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Maintenance treatment in COPD recommends triple therapy (TT), often following use of mono-or dual-therapy. We explored how pathways to TT vary across countries. Aims and Objectives: We investigated the proportion of patients on TT relative to the timing of their COPD diagnosis and the treatment pathway to TT including the time from diagnosis to initiation of TT and adherence. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was performed using anonymised patient-level data from UK, France, Germany, Italy, and Australia from 01/01/2005 to 01/05/2016. Patients were included if their first TT regimen was recorded during this period and they had ≥12 months data pre-index (COPD diagnosis). The proportion of patients on TT before COPD diagnosis was also determined. Treatment pathways and time to TT initiation following index were evaluated. Adherence to TT was estimated using proportion of days covered. Results: Overall 130,729 eligible patients were included. Mean age at diagnosis ranged from 63.4 (SD:10.4) years [pneumologist-treated in Germany] to 69.8 (9.9) years [Italy]. Time to TT ranged from median 16.9 months in Australia (IQR: 5.7 – 36.2) to 42.5 months in the UK (IQR: 13.9 -87.4). TT initiated first formed the largest treatment pathway (7.5% in UK to 17.1% in France). In meta-analyses of patients across all countries, 20.4% (95% CI: 13.8-29.1%) of patients initiated TT prior to COPD diagnosis. Estimated adherence was >80% in all countries during the time the patient was persistent with TT. Conclusions: Diverse patient pathways to TT were observed both between and within countries, many of which do not align with COPD treatment recommendations.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
三联疗法途径:慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)的多国回顾性观察研究
背景:慢性阻塞性肺病的维持治疗推荐三联治疗(TT),通常在使用单一或双重治疗之后。我们探讨了各国TT途径的差异。目的和目的:我们调查了TT患者相对于COPD诊断时间的比例,以及TT的治疗途径,包括从诊断到开始TT和坚持治疗的时间。方法:采用2005年1月1日至2016年5月1日期间来自英国、法国、德国、意大利和澳大利亚的匿名患者数据进行回顾性队列研究。如果患者在此期间记录了他们的第一次TT方案,并且他们有≥12个月的前指数(COPD诊断)数据,则纳入患者。同时确定慢性阻塞性肺病诊断前接受TT治疗的患者比例。评估治疗途径和TT起始时间。使用覆盖天数的比例来估计TT的依从性。结果:共纳入130,729例符合条件的患者。诊断时的平均年龄从德国的63.4岁(SD:10.4)岁到意大利的69.8岁(9.9)岁不等。到TT的中位时间从澳大利亚的16.9个月(IQR: 5.7 - 36.2)到英国的42.5个月(IQR: 13.9 -87.4)不等。TT首先形成了最大的治疗途径(英国为7.5%,法国为17.1%)。在所有国家患者的荟萃分析中,20.4% (95% CI: 13.8-29.1%)的患者在COPD诊断前开始TT治疗。在所有国家,在患者持续接受TT治疗期间,估计依从性>80%。结论:在国家之间和国家内部观察到不同的患者TT途径,其中许多不符合COPD治疗建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Ionic Calcium in Blood as Early Marker of Severity in Patients with COVID-19 Collaborative care positively inverts the proportion of severe cases in the pulmonology clinic in the public health system: a Brazilian experience Overdiagnosis of COPD and asthma among elderly with chronic dyspnea The association between lung function in adults and the socioeconomic profile in a long-term follow-up Exploration of the feasibility to combine patients with COPD and chronic heart failure in self management groups with focus on exercise self-efficacy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1