Information Visualization Heuristics in Practical Expert Evaluation

H. Väätäjä, Jari Varsaluoma, T. Heimonen, Katariina Tiitinen, Jaakko Hakulinen, M. Turunen, Harri Nieminen, Petri Ihantola
{"title":"Information Visualization Heuristics in Practical Expert Evaluation","authors":"H. Väätäjä, Jari Varsaluoma, T. Heimonen, Katariina Tiitinen, Jaakko Hakulinen, M. Turunen, Harri Nieminen, Petri Ihantola","doi":"10.1145/2993901.2993918","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"While traditional HCI heuristics can be used to find usability issues also from information visualization systems, specialized heuristics tailored for the information visualization (InfoViz) domain can be more effective and focus on the special characteristics of these systems. In this study, we describe the application of ten information visualization heuristics from prior research and their testing in practical heuristic evaluation. We found that the selected heuristics were useful with good coverage in our application case. However, based on our observations, we argue that interaction, veracity, and aesthetics related heuristics should be added to the previously used set. The lack of domain knowledge made the evaluators somewhat uneasy with their capability to carry out the investigation in-depth. We suggest to train domain experts with understanding of the data and application domain to carry out the evaluation to get insightful feedback beyond usability issues.","PeriodicalId":235801,"journal":{"name":"Workshop on Beyond Time and Errors: Novel Evaluation Methods for Visualization","volume":"42 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"13","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Workshop on Beyond Time and Errors: Novel Evaluation Methods for Visualization","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2993901.2993918","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

Abstract

While traditional HCI heuristics can be used to find usability issues also from information visualization systems, specialized heuristics tailored for the information visualization (InfoViz) domain can be more effective and focus on the special characteristics of these systems. In this study, we describe the application of ten information visualization heuristics from prior research and their testing in practical heuristic evaluation. We found that the selected heuristics were useful with good coverage in our application case. However, based on our observations, we argue that interaction, veracity, and aesthetics related heuristics should be added to the previously used set. The lack of domain knowledge made the evaluators somewhat uneasy with their capability to carry out the investigation in-depth. We suggest to train domain experts with understanding of the data and application domain to carry out the evaluation to get insightful feedback beyond usability issues.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
信息可视化启发式在实际专家评估中的应用
虽然传统的HCI启发式方法也可用于从信息可视化系统中发现可用性问题,但为信息可视化(InfoViz)领域量身定制的专门启发式方法可能更有效,并且更侧重于这些系统的特殊特征。在本研究中,我们描述了十种信息可视化启发式的应用,以及它们在实际启发式评估中的测试。我们发现所选择的启发式方法在我们的应用案例中具有良好的覆盖率。然而,根据我们的观察,我们认为应该将交互、准确性和美学相关的启发式添加到先前使用的集合中。领域知识的缺乏使评估人员对深入开展调查的能力感到有些不安。我们建议培训了解数据和应用领域的领域专家进行评估,以获得超越可用性问题的有见地的反馈。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Lowering the Barrier for Successful Replication and Evaluation A Nested Workflow Model for Visual Analytics Design and Validation Cognitive Stages in Visual Data Exploration Evaluating Information Visualization on Mobile Devices: Gaps and Challenges in the Empirical Evaluation Design Space Action Design Research and Visualization Design
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1