Kapittel 7. Kreativ vitskapsprosa – eit relevant kriterium i fagfellevurdering?

Norunn Askeland
{"title":"Kapittel 7. Kreativ vitskapsprosa – eit relevant kriterium i fagfellevurdering?","authors":"Norunn Askeland","doi":"10.18261/9788215031613-2019-08","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The chapter is an analysis of the best journal article in Universitetsforlaget’s election in 2013. The jury referred to the article as «professionally innovative and well-communicated». The analysis shows that techniques from creative writing in nonfiction can contribute to qualitative research being less cumbersome and with less «ventriloquism». The article culminates in a discussion of how peer review can include creative writing and promote new and innovative texts in science.","PeriodicalId":405740,"journal":{"name":"Kreativ akademisk skriving","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kreativ akademisk skriving","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18261/9788215031613-2019-08","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The chapter is an analysis of the best journal article in Universitetsforlaget’s election in 2013. The jury referred to the article as «professionally innovative and well-communicated». The analysis shows that techniques from creative writing in nonfiction can contribute to qualitative research being less cumbersome and with less «ventriloquism». The article culminates in a discussion of how peer review can include creative writing and promote new and innovative texts in science.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
这一章是对2013年Universitetsforlaget选举中最佳期刊文章的分析。评审团认为这篇文章“专业创新,沟通良好”。分析表明,来自非小说类创意写作的技术可以帮助定性研究减少繁琐,减少“口技”。文章最后讨论了同行评议如何将创造性写作纳入其中,并促进科学领域的新文本和创新文本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Kapittel 11. Om Askeladdens metode – eller essayet som erkjennelsesveiog visdomsdannende skrivepraksis Kapittel 6. Pavlenkos metode Kapittel 10. Avgangseksamen i norsk – på kva måtar gir oppgåvene mogelegheittil kreativ akademisk skriving? Kapittel 4. Har kreativitet noen plass i stilarten «sakprosa»? Rolf Pippingsutløsning fra 1938 revisited Kapittel 2. Siste nytt om sannheten. Om å finne språk for det virkelige
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1