Thinking about Islam, Politics and Muslim Identity in a Digital Age

Hasan Azad
{"title":"Thinking about Islam, Politics and Muslim Identity in a Digital Age","authors":"Hasan Azad","doi":"10.2979/JIMS.2.2.09","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:Since digitality emerges from a Western, Eurocentric weltanschauung, it follows that the digital sphere tacitly rejects Islam and Muslims, where Islam and Muslims are the archetypal Other of the West. Digitality is a continuation of Orientalism, or a Eurocentric power/knowledge project of (continued) global domination. Given Eurocentrism’s inherent racism, given digitality’s omnipresence, and given that Islamophobia is the paradigmatic example of racism, it is inevitable that there will be more and more anti-Islamic/anti-Muslim sentiments throughout the world. This essay is an examination of the ways in which politics in the digital age are reconfigured to fit specific parameters preordained by the digital sphere, and, concurrently, ideas around Islam and Muslimness—whether according to the wider social (media) landscape or by Muslim actors themselves—are also significantly re-shaped by digitality. Digital Islam is disrupting traditional ulematic authority in ways never seen before. This is because authority/knowledge within the interactive spaces of Web 2.0 is dissected, reconfigured and reassembled as another kind of knowledge. Digitality is challenging various branches of Islam (whether Shia, Sunni, Wahhabi, or what have you), when it comes to their authority, not least because traditional Islamic authorities have to now—consciously and unconsciously—comport themselves and their message to the logic of digitality.","PeriodicalId":388440,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Islamic and Muslim Studies","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Islamic and Muslim Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2979/JIMS.2.2.09","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Abstract:Since digitality emerges from a Western, Eurocentric weltanschauung, it follows that the digital sphere tacitly rejects Islam and Muslims, where Islam and Muslims are the archetypal Other of the West. Digitality is a continuation of Orientalism, or a Eurocentric power/knowledge project of (continued) global domination. Given Eurocentrism’s inherent racism, given digitality’s omnipresence, and given that Islamophobia is the paradigmatic example of racism, it is inevitable that there will be more and more anti-Islamic/anti-Muslim sentiments throughout the world. This essay is an examination of the ways in which politics in the digital age are reconfigured to fit specific parameters preordained by the digital sphere, and, concurrently, ideas around Islam and Muslimness—whether according to the wider social (media) landscape or by Muslim actors themselves—are also significantly re-shaped by digitality. Digital Islam is disrupting traditional ulematic authority in ways never seen before. This is because authority/knowledge within the interactive spaces of Web 2.0 is dissected, reconfigured and reassembled as another kind of knowledge. Digitality is challenging various branches of Islam (whether Shia, Sunni, Wahhabi, or what have you), when it comes to their authority, not least because traditional Islamic authorities have to now—consciously and unconsciously—comport themselves and their message to the logic of digitality.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
思考数字时代的伊斯兰、政治和穆斯林身份
摘要:由于数字化产生于西方的、以欧洲为中心的世界观,因此数字领域默认地拒绝伊斯兰教和穆斯林,而伊斯兰教和穆斯林是西方的原型他者。数字化是东方主义的延续,或者是以欧洲为中心的(持续的)全球统治的权力/知识项目。考虑到欧洲中心主义固有的种族主义,考虑到数字无处不在,考虑到伊斯兰恐惧症是种族主义的典型例子,世界各地将不可避免地出现越来越多的反伊斯兰/反穆斯林情绪。本文考察了数字时代的政治如何被重新配置,以适应数字领域预先设定的特定参数,同时,围绕伊斯兰教和穆斯林的思想——无论是根据更广泛的社会(媒体)景观还是穆斯林行动者自己——也被数字化显著地重新塑造。数字伊斯兰正在以前所未有的方式破坏传统的教规权威。这是因为Web 2.0交互空间中的权威/知识作为另一种知识被剖析、重新配置和重新组装。数字化正在挑战伊斯兰教的各个分支(无论是什叶派、逊尼派、瓦哈比教派,还是其他什么教派)的权威,尤其是因为传统的伊斯兰教权威现在必须有意识地或无意识地使自己和他们的信息符合数字化的逻辑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Philosophy as a ‘Resisting Identity’?: Taha Abdurrahman, Fethi al-Meskini, and Aziz al-Azmeh in Dialogue on Modernist Arab Philosophy The Transformation of the Human Self through Religious Practice in Sufism and Buddhism Curriculum Renewal for Islamic Education: Critical Perspectives on Teaching Islam in Primary and Secondary Schools (By Eds. Nadeem A. Memon, Mariam Alhashmi, and Mohamad Abdalla) The Moral and Ethical Role of Taqwa in the Personal, Social, Economic, and Political Spheres of Life in the 21st Century Islamicate Cosmopolitan Spirit (By Bruce B. Lawrence)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1