Diabetes and pregnancy. Preconception care, pregnancy outcomes, resource utilization and costs.

W. Herman, N. Janz, M. Becker, D. Charron-Prochownik
{"title":"Diabetes and pregnancy. Preconception care, pregnancy outcomes, resource utilization and costs.","authors":"W. Herman, N. Janz, M. Becker, D. Charron-Prochownik","doi":"10.1097/00006254-199908000-00005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVE\nTo describe and compare pregnancy outcomes, resource utilization and costs among women with diabetes who receive and do not receive preconception care.\n\n\nSTUDY DESIGN\nA multicenter, prospective, observational study of women with type 1 diabetes who received preconception care (PC), became pregnant and delivered (PC women) and women with type 1 diabetes who received prenatal care (PC) only and delivered (PN women).\n\n\nRESULTS\nAs compared to PN women (n = 74), PC women (n = 24) were seen earlier in gestation and had significantly lower glycosylated hemoglobin levels. The combined number of outpatient visits for PC women was not greater than for PN women. PC women were hospitalized significantly less during pregnancy and tended to have shorter inpatient stays. The mean length of stay after delivery was significantly shorter for PC women. Intensity of care tended to be lower and length of stay shorter for infants of mothers who received PC care. The net cost saving associated with PC care was approximately $34,000 per patient.\n\n\nCONCLUSION\nPC achieves its major intended health benefits and is associated with reduced resource utilization and substantially reduced costs. For both health and economic reasons, clinical practice and public policy should embrace PC.","PeriodicalId":192418,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of reproductive medicine","volume":"59 1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"70","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of reproductive medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/00006254-199908000-00005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 70

Abstract

OBJECTIVE To describe and compare pregnancy outcomes, resource utilization and costs among women with diabetes who receive and do not receive preconception care. STUDY DESIGN A multicenter, prospective, observational study of women with type 1 diabetes who received preconception care (PC), became pregnant and delivered (PC women) and women with type 1 diabetes who received prenatal care (PC) only and delivered (PN women). RESULTS As compared to PN women (n = 74), PC women (n = 24) were seen earlier in gestation and had significantly lower glycosylated hemoglobin levels. The combined number of outpatient visits for PC women was not greater than for PN women. PC women were hospitalized significantly less during pregnancy and tended to have shorter inpatient stays. The mean length of stay after delivery was significantly shorter for PC women. Intensity of care tended to be lower and length of stay shorter for infants of mothers who received PC care. The net cost saving associated with PC care was approximately $34,000 per patient. CONCLUSION PC achieves its major intended health benefits and is associated with reduced resource utilization and substantially reduced costs. For both health and economic reasons, clinical practice and public policy should embrace PC.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
糖尿病和怀孕。孕前护理,妊娠结局,资源利用和成本。
目的描述和比较接受和未接受孕前护理的糖尿病妇女的妊娠结局、资源利用和成本。研究设计:一项多中心、前瞻性、观察性研究,研究对象为接受孕前护理(PC)、怀孕和分娩的1型糖尿病女性(PC女性)和仅接受产前护理(PC)并分娩的1型糖尿病女性(PN女性)。结果与PN妇女(n = 74)相比,PC妇女(n = 24)在妊娠早期出现,糖化血红蛋白水平显著降低。PC妇女的门诊总次数并不大于PN妇女。PC妇女在怀孕期间住院显著减少,住院时间往往较短。PC妇女分娩后的平均住院时间明显缩短。接受PC护理的母亲所生婴儿的护理强度较低,住院时间较短。与PC护理相关的净成本节约约为每位患者34,000美元。结论pc达到了预期的主要健康效益,并与减少资源利用率和大幅降低成本相关。出于健康和经济原因,临床实践和公共政策都应该接受PC。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Clinical Risk Factors Do Not Predict Shoulder Dystocia. Timing of Referral to the New England Trophoblastic Disease Center: Does Referral with Molar Pregnancy Versus Postmolar Gestational Trophoblastic Neoplasia Affect Outcomes? Quantitative Assessment of Endometrial Volume and Uterine Vascularity and Pregnancy Outcome in Frozen-Thawed Embryo Transfer Cycles. Birth Outcomes by Infertility Diagnosis Analyses of the Massachusetts Outcomes Study of Assisted Reproductive Technologies (MOSART). Blood Contaminated Amniotic Fluid and the Lamellar Body Count Fetal Lung Maturity Test.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1