Effects of History and Culture on Attitudes toward Special Education: A Comparison of Finland and Norway

ISRN Education Pub Date : 2012-06-26 DOI:10.5402/2012/161039
M. Takala, R. Hausstätter
{"title":"Effects of History and Culture on Attitudes toward Special Education: A Comparison of Finland and Norway","authors":"M. Takala, R. Hausstätter","doi":"10.5402/2012/161039","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper discusses the role of special education in Finland and Norway. There are major differences in how special education is understood in these countries. The different perspective that Finland and Norway have on the concept of inclusion is also striking. The PISA test results show that the Finnish school is performing well, partly because of flexible part-time special education; the early intervention strategy also plays a role in this success. These aspects are making Finnish schools inclusive; support is offered immediately when it is needed without any bureaucratic process. An effective teacher education program is also a key element in creating a successful school system. Norway’s relatively weak educational results could mean that despite their strong focus on inclusion, Norwegian schools are not inclusive. The quality of special education is debated. If it is true that special education is helping to create success in schools, then clearly there is a need to discover more about the different systems and what factors may influence that success. \nDespite the close geographical and political relationship between Norway and Finland, there exists clear differences in the educational area.","PeriodicalId":202265,"journal":{"name":"ISRN Education","volume":"36 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ISRN Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5402/2012/161039","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

This paper discusses the role of special education in Finland and Norway. There are major differences in how special education is understood in these countries. The different perspective that Finland and Norway have on the concept of inclusion is also striking. The PISA test results show that the Finnish school is performing well, partly because of flexible part-time special education; the early intervention strategy also plays a role in this success. These aspects are making Finnish schools inclusive; support is offered immediately when it is needed without any bureaucratic process. An effective teacher education program is also a key element in creating a successful school system. Norway’s relatively weak educational results could mean that despite their strong focus on inclusion, Norwegian schools are not inclusive. The quality of special education is debated. If it is true that special education is helping to create success in schools, then clearly there is a need to discover more about the different systems and what factors may influence that success. Despite the close geographical and political relationship between Norway and Finland, there exists clear differences in the educational area.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
历史文化对特殊教育态度的影响:芬兰与挪威的比较
本文探讨了特殊教育在芬兰和挪威的作用。这些国家对特殊教育的理解存在重大差异。芬兰和挪威对包容概念的不同看法也令人震惊。PISA测试结果显示,芬兰学校表现良好,部分原因在于灵活的非全日制特殊教育;早期干预策略也在这一成功中发挥了作用。这些方面使芬兰学校具有包容性;在需要时立即提供支持,而不需要任何官僚程序。一个有效的教师教育计划也是创建一个成功的学校系统的关键因素。挪威相对较弱的教育结果可能意味着,尽管他们非常注重包容性,但挪威的学校并不具有包容性。特殊教育的质量备受争议。如果特殊教育确实有助于在学校创造成功,那么显然有必要更多地了解不同的系统,以及哪些因素可能影响这种成功。尽管挪威和芬兰在地理和政治上有着密切的关系,但在教育领域却存在着明显的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Inquiry-Based Education for Students with Visual Impairment Comparison of Teacher Motivation for Mathematics and Special Educators in Middle Schools That Have and Have Not Achieved AYP Considering District and School Factors and Their Relationship to ACT Performance in North Carolina: An Examination of the ACT Pilot Results Caring for Students: What Teachers Have to Say Tool Use in Computer-Based Learning Environments: Adopting and Extending the Technology Acceptance Model
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1