Pandemic Food Delivery: Plummet or Prosper?

Jared Arthur Coleman, N. Carrillo
{"title":"Pandemic Food Delivery: Plummet or Prosper?","authors":"Jared Arthur Coleman, N. Carrillo","doi":"10.32473/ufjur.v23i.128732","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As one of the many unique markets where the opportunity arose to utilize the COVID-19 pandemic to stimulate monetary growth and increase popularity, third-party delivery services made an interesting case to evaluate financial performance pre- and mid-pandemic. The primary purpose of this research was to determine whether the businesses GrubHub, UberEats, and DoorDash were successful in facilitating growth with the seemingly advantageous circumstances provided by the national emergency. Financial performance was evaluated utilizing economic key performance indicators (KPIs) for revenue, liquidity, and profitability. All data was collected from eight quarterly income statements and balance sheets from 2019 and 2020 for each company. Averages of the KPIs were computed for cumulative quarters prior to and including March 2020, after the announcement of COVID-19 restrictions, and the quarters subsequent to that date range; the mean values were then compared across both time periods. Results suggest an overall positive trend for DoorDash for all metrics and negative trend in terms of liquidity for UberEats and GrubHub. Furthermore, revenues for all three platforms possessed an increased expansion rate during COVID-19 within a range of 9.07-12.60%. Implications of this experiment include possible research of non-food delivery platforms that operate based on the sale of virtual products during the pandemic or further exploration of such companies as COVID-19 begins to subside.","PeriodicalId":278243,"journal":{"name":"UF Journal of Undergraduate Research","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"UF Journal of Undergraduate Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32473/ufjur.v23i.128732","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As one of the many unique markets where the opportunity arose to utilize the COVID-19 pandemic to stimulate monetary growth and increase popularity, third-party delivery services made an interesting case to evaluate financial performance pre- and mid-pandemic. The primary purpose of this research was to determine whether the businesses GrubHub, UberEats, and DoorDash were successful in facilitating growth with the seemingly advantageous circumstances provided by the national emergency. Financial performance was evaluated utilizing economic key performance indicators (KPIs) for revenue, liquidity, and profitability. All data was collected from eight quarterly income statements and balance sheets from 2019 and 2020 for each company. Averages of the KPIs were computed for cumulative quarters prior to and including March 2020, after the announcement of COVID-19 restrictions, and the quarters subsequent to that date range; the mean values were then compared across both time periods. Results suggest an overall positive trend for DoorDash for all metrics and negative trend in terms of liquidity for UberEats and GrubHub. Furthermore, revenues for all three platforms possessed an increased expansion rate during COVID-19 within a range of 9.07-12.60%. Implications of this experiment include possible research of non-food delivery platforms that operate based on the sale of virtual products during the pandemic or further exploration of such companies as COVID-19 begins to subside.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
流行病食品配送:暴跌还是繁荣?
作为利用COVID-19大流行刺激货币增长和提高人气的机会出现的众多独特市场之一,第三方交付服务在大流行前和中期评估财务绩效时提出了一个有趣的案例。本研究的主要目的是确定GrubHub、UberEats和DoorDash这三家公司是否在国家紧急状态提供的看似有利的环境下成功地促进了增长。利用经济关键绩效指标(kpi)对收入、流动性和盈利能力进行财务绩效评估。所有数据均收集自每家公司2019年至2020年的8个季度损益表和资产负债表。计算了2020年3月之前和包括2020年3月在内的累计季度、宣布COVID-19限制措施后以及该日期范围之后的季度的kpi平均值;然后比较两个时间段的平均值。结果表明,DoorDash在所有指标上总体呈积极趋势,而UberEats和GrubHub的流动性呈消极趋势。此外,在COVID-19期间,所有三个平台的收入增长率均在9.07-12.60%之间。该实验的意义包括可能研究在大流行期间以虚拟产品销售为基础的非食品配送平台,或者随着COVID-19开始消退,进一步探索此类公司。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
University Faculty Perceptions of Climate Change in U.S. Evaluating Spatial Filtering on Diffusion MRI Data Harmonization in Parkinsonism Examining Language Interactivity Through Classifier Masked Primes in Chinese-English Bilinguals Predicting the future of mental health: (how) will in utero COVID-19 infection influence psychiatric illness in future generations?  Nazi Conspirator, Russian Patriot: Judging General Andrei Vlasov
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1