Logical Foundations of Quantitative Equality

Francesco Dagnino, Fabio Pasquali
{"title":"Logical Foundations of Quantitative Equality","authors":"Francesco Dagnino, Fabio Pasquali","doi":"10.1145/3531130.3533337","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In quantitative reasoning one compares objects by distances, instead of equivalence relations, so that one can measure how much they are similar, rather than just saying whether they are equivalent or not. In this paper we aim at providing a logical ground to quantitative reasoning with distances in Linear Logic, using the categorical language of Lawvere’s doctrines. The key idea is to see distances as equality predicates in Linear Logic. We use graded modalities to write a resource sensitive substitution rule for equality, which allows us to give it a quantitative meaning by distances. We introduce a deductive calculus for (Graded) Linear Logic with quantitative equality and the notion of Lipschitz doctrine to give it a sound and complete categorical semantics. We also describe a universal construction of Lipschitz doctrines, which generates examples based for instance on metric spaces and quantitative realisability.","PeriodicalId":373589,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 37th Annual ACM/IEEE Symposium on Logic in Computer Science","volume":"44 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 37th Annual ACM/IEEE Symposium on Logic in Computer Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3531130.3533337","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

In quantitative reasoning one compares objects by distances, instead of equivalence relations, so that one can measure how much they are similar, rather than just saying whether they are equivalent or not. In this paper we aim at providing a logical ground to quantitative reasoning with distances in Linear Logic, using the categorical language of Lawvere’s doctrines. The key idea is to see distances as equality predicates in Linear Logic. We use graded modalities to write a resource sensitive substitution rule for equality, which allows us to give it a quantitative meaning by distances. We introduce a deductive calculus for (Graded) Linear Logic with quantitative equality and the notion of Lipschitz doctrine to give it a sound and complete categorical semantics. We also describe a universal construction of Lipschitz doctrines, which generates examples based for instance on metric spaces and quantitative realisability.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
数量相等的逻辑基础
在定量推理中,人们用距离来比较物体,而不是用等价关系来比较,这样人们就可以测量它们有多相似,而不是仅仅说它们是否等价。在本文中,我们的目的是提供一个逻辑基础定量推理与距离在线性逻辑中,使用劳弗莱的学说的范畴语言。关键思想是把距离看作线性逻辑中的等式谓词。我们使用分级模式来编写一个资源敏感的等式替换规则,这使我们能够通过距离给它一个定量的意义。我们引入了一种具有数量相等的(分级)线性逻辑的演绎法和Lipschitz学说的概念,使其具有健全完备的范畴语义。我们还描述了Lipschitz理论的一个普遍结构,它产生了基于度量空间和定量可实现性的例子。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Varieties of Quantitative Algebras and Their Monads Transducers of polynomial growth Computable PAC Learning of Continuous Features A first-order completeness result about characteristic Boolean algebras in classical realizability Partitions and Ewens Distributions in element-free Probability Theory
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1