A culturalist perspective to Russian international posture in XXI century

A. Stilo
{"title":"A culturalist perspective to Russian international posture in XXI century","authors":"A. Stilo","doi":"10.2478/gssfj-2022-0001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This paper is aimed at proposing an analysis of the Russian geopolitical self-perception in the light of a “culturalist” approach. The paper uses Samuel Huntington’s “model of civilizations” as an interpretative prism, following a multidisciplinary approach which allows to epistemologically validate certain points of the Huntingtonian thesis, and to reject others. This approach does not invalidate the neo-realist theories of international relations regarding the Russian search for a relative increase of power through the use of material factors. If anything, the culturalist perspective must be placed side by side with the neo-realist one in order to better grasp some intangible elements, in particular the attention paid by Moscow to its (former) imperial dimension, the influence exercised by the autocratic tradition on Russia’s international posture, together with the role of geographic space, the ascendency of the Orthodox church, as well as Eurasianist cultural inclinations. Finally, through a critical analysis and a selective review of the academic literature on these issues (as well as of the political texts published by some of the most prominent Russian politicians and intellectuals), the paper aims to demonstrate the self-perceived originality of the Russian model and its difficulty in being placed within the Western political categories.","PeriodicalId":210682,"journal":{"name":"Geopolitical, Social Security and Freedom Journal","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geopolitical, Social Security and Freedom Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/gssfj-2022-0001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract This paper is aimed at proposing an analysis of the Russian geopolitical self-perception in the light of a “culturalist” approach. The paper uses Samuel Huntington’s “model of civilizations” as an interpretative prism, following a multidisciplinary approach which allows to epistemologically validate certain points of the Huntingtonian thesis, and to reject others. This approach does not invalidate the neo-realist theories of international relations regarding the Russian search for a relative increase of power through the use of material factors. If anything, the culturalist perspective must be placed side by side with the neo-realist one in order to better grasp some intangible elements, in particular the attention paid by Moscow to its (former) imperial dimension, the influence exercised by the autocratic tradition on Russia’s international posture, together with the role of geographic space, the ascendency of the Orthodox church, as well as Eurasianist cultural inclinations. Finally, through a critical analysis and a selective review of the academic literature on these issues (as well as of the political texts published by some of the most prominent Russian politicians and intellectuals), the paper aims to demonstrate the self-perceived originality of the Russian model and its difficulty in being placed within the Western political categories.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
21世纪俄罗斯国际姿态的文化主义透视
摘要本文旨在从“文化主义”的角度分析俄罗斯的地缘政治自我认知。本文使用塞缪尔·亨廷顿的“文明模型”作为解释棱镜,遵循多学科方法,允许认识论上验证亨廷顿理论的某些观点,并拒绝其他观点。这种做法并没有否定新现实主义的国际关系理论,即俄罗斯通过使用物质因素寻求相对增强的力量。如果说有什么不同的话,那就是必须把文化主义的视角与新现实主义的视角放在一起,以便更好地把握一些无形的因素,特别是莫斯科对其(前)帝国维度的关注,专制传统对俄罗斯国际姿态的影响,以及地理空间的作用,东正教的优势,以及欧亚文化倾向。最后,通过对这些问题的学术文献(以及一些最杰出的俄罗斯政治家和知识分子发表的政治文本)的批判性分析和选择性回顾,本文旨在证明俄罗斯模式的自我认知独创性及其在被置于西方政治范畴中的困难。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The contribution of cognitive and neurological sciences to the study of leadership. University in Changing Environment and University Employees’ Attitudes towards Ideal Leadership Reflections on globalisation, leadership and pedagogy: Competence-based didactics and Objective based Training. The competence leadership from philosophical and political direction and the challenges in education Leadership in heterogeneous educational institutions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1