Teamwork Makes the String Work: A Pilot Test of the Loose String Task with African Crested Porcupines (Hystrix cristata)

Jordyn Truax, J. Vonk, Joyce Vincent, Z. K. Bell
{"title":"Teamwork Makes the String Work: A Pilot Test of the Loose String Task with African Crested Porcupines (Hystrix cristata)","authors":"Jordyn Truax, J. Vonk, Joyce Vincent, Z. K. Bell","doi":"10.3390/jzbg3030034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Comparative researchers have heavily focused their studies of social cognition on species that live in large social groups, while neglecting other potential predictors of social cognition. African crested porcupines (Hystrix cristata) are relatively rare among mammals in that they are cooperative breeders that pair for life. Little is known about their social cognition, but they are good candidates for exploring cooperative behavior due to the need to coordinate behavior to cooperatively raise young. Cooperation, as defined in this study, is the process by which two or more participants perform independent actions on an object to obtain a reward for all parties. Humans are thought to outperform all other species in the frequency and magnitude of cooperative behaviors. Yet, only by studying a variety of species can researchers fully understand the likely selection pressures for cooperation, such as cooperative breeding. Here, we pilot tested the feasibility of the popular loose-string task with a mated pair of African crested porcupines, a task that required the porcupines to cooperatively pull ropes to access an out of reach platform baited with food rewards. Other species presented with this task were able to work together to receive rewards but did not always demonstrate understanding of the role of their partner. The porcupines achieved success but did not appear to coordinate their actions or solicit behavior from their partner. Thus, similar to other species, they may achieve success in this task without taking their partner’s role into account. This study demonstrates that the loose string task can be used to assess cooperation in porcupines. However, further experiments are needed to assess the porcupine’s understanding of their partner’s role under this paradigm.","PeriodicalId":228608,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Zoological and Botanical Gardens","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Zoological and Botanical Gardens","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/jzbg3030034","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Comparative researchers have heavily focused their studies of social cognition on species that live in large social groups, while neglecting other potential predictors of social cognition. African crested porcupines (Hystrix cristata) are relatively rare among mammals in that they are cooperative breeders that pair for life. Little is known about their social cognition, but they are good candidates for exploring cooperative behavior due to the need to coordinate behavior to cooperatively raise young. Cooperation, as defined in this study, is the process by which two or more participants perform independent actions on an object to obtain a reward for all parties. Humans are thought to outperform all other species in the frequency and magnitude of cooperative behaviors. Yet, only by studying a variety of species can researchers fully understand the likely selection pressures for cooperation, such as cooperative breeding. Here, we pilot tested the feasibility of the popular loose-string task with a mated pair of African crested porcupines, a task that required the porcupines to cooperatively pull ropes to access an out of reach platform baited with food rewards. Other species presented with this task were able to work together to receive rewards but did not always demonstrate understanding of the role of their partner. The porcupines achieved success but did not appear to coordinate their actions or solicit behavior from their partner. Thus, similar to other species, they may achieve success in this task without taking their partner’s role into account. This study demonstrates that the loose string task can be used to assess cooperation in porcupines. However, further experiments are needed to assess the porcupine’s understanding of their partner’s role under this paradigm.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
团队合作使管柱有效:非洲冠毛豪猪(Hystrix cristata)松散管柱任务的试点测试
比较研究人员将社会认知的研究重点放在生活在大型社会群体中的物种上,而忽略了社会认知的其他潜在预测因素。非洲冠豪猪(Hystrix cristata)在哺乳动物中相对罕见,因为它们是合作繁殖者,终生配对。我们对它们的社会认知知之甚少,但它们是探索合作行为的良好候选者,因为它们需要协调行为来合作抚养后代。本研究将合作定义为两个或两个以上的参与者在一个对象上进行独立的行动,以获得各方的奖励。在合作行为的频率和规模上,人类被认为胜过所有其他物种。然而,只有通过研究多种物种,研究人员才能充分了解合作可能带来的选择压力,比如合作繁殖。在这里,我们用一对非洲冠状豪猪测试了流行的松绳任务的可行性,这项任务要求豪猪合作拉绳子进入一个不可及的平台,平台上有食物奖励。其他参与这项任务的物种能够一起工作以获得奖励,但并不总是表现出对伴侣角色的理解。豪猪取得了成功,但似乎没有协调他们的行动,也没有征求伴侣的行为。因此,与其他物种类似,它们可能在不考虑伴侣角色的情况下成功完成这项任务。本研究证明松绳任务可以用来评估豪猪的合作行为。然而,需要进一步的实验来评估豪猪在这种范式下对伴侣角色的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Evaluating Potential Indicators of Welfare for Zoo Birds during an Avian Influenza Enforced Housing Order Empathy Capacity-Building through a Community of Practice Approach: Exploring Perceived Impacts and Implications Rio de Janeiro Botanical Garden: Biodiversity Conservation in a Tropical Arboretum Sustainable Energy Use in Buildings: A Leadership Opportunity for Gardens and Zoos What Types of Animals Should Be in the Future Zoo? Thoughts from United States Residents and Zoo and Aquarium Staff
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1