Forward slices are smaller than backward slices

D. Binkley, M. Harman
{"title":"Forward slices are smaller than backward slices","authors":"D. Binkley, M. Harman","doi":"10.1109/SCAM.2005.28","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper presents evidence from two empirical studies which show that forward slices will tend to be smaller than backward slices and discusses the importance of this result for work on source code analysis and manipulation. The difference in forward and backward slice size distributions stems from the way in which control dependence and data dependence affect slice size. The paper explains this claim in detail and supports it with empirical evidence. The empirical evidence comes from a further study which uses a restricted form of slicing that isolates the effects due to control and data dependence. This study shows that it is the inherent difference between forward and backward control dependence that leads to the difference in slice size distributions for forward and backward slicing. The results from all three empirical studies are shown to be strongly statistically significant.","PeriodicalId":394744,"journal":{"name":"Fifth IEEE International Workshop on Source Code Analysis and Manipulation (SCAM'05)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"25","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fifth IEEE International Workshop on Source Code Analysis and Manipulation (SCAM'05)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SCAM.2005.28","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 25

Abstract

This paper presents evidence from two empirical studies which show that forward slices will tend to be smaller than backward slices and discusses the importance of this result for work on source code analysis and manipulation. The difference in forward and backward slice size distributions stems from the way in which control dependence and data dependence affect slice size. The paper explains this claim in detail and supports it with empirical evidence. The empirical evidence comes from a further study which uses a restricted form of slicing that isolates the effects due to control and data dependence. This study shows that it is the inherent difference between forward and backward control dependence that leads to the difference in slice size distributions for forward and backward slicing. The results from all three empirical studies are shown to be strongly statistically significant.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
向前切片比向后切片小
本文提出了两个实证研究的证据,表明前向切片往往比后向切片小,并讨论了这一结果对源代码分析和操作工作的重要性。向前和向后切片大小分布的差异源于控制依赖性和数据依赖性影响切片大小的方式。本文详细解释了这一说法,并以经验证据支持它。经验证据来自一项进一步的研究,该研究使用了一种有限形式的切片,隔离了由于控制和数据依赖而产生的影响。本研究表明,前向和后向控制依赖之间的内在差异导致了前向和后向切片的切片大小分布的差异。这三个实证研究的结果都具有很强的统计学意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A fast analysis for thread-local garbage collection with dynamic class loading Control flow graph reconstruction for assembly language programs with delayed instructions Static analysis for computing escapability and mutability for Java components Dynamic slicing of Java bytecode programs Minimal slicing and the relationships between forms of slicing
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1