Un regard sur le français inclusif canadien dans une journée de Twitter

Yarubi Diaz Colmenares
{"title":"Un regard sur le français inclusif canadien dans une journée de Twitter","authors":"Yarubi Diaz Colmenares","doi":"10.33137/twpl.v43i1.35953","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper looks at the variation of typographical procedures and agreements related to inclusive French (FI) on the microblogging system Twitter in Canada. The corpus used includes 464 tweets geo-localized in Montreal, Ottawa and Quebec and published on May 12th, 2020. They were sorted into cases of simple inclusion (IS), uniform agreement (AU) and mixed agreement (AM). The results showed that IS (57%) is the most preferred approach. When the tweets presented more than one FI mark, the preferred structure was AM (27%). When compared to the 15% of AU cases, we might conclude that uniform agreement is not common in this corpus. The analysis of AM tokens showed a gradual decrease in agreement marks throughout a given tweet. The preferred FI typographical procedures in this corpus (complete doublets, abbreviated doublets with parentheses, and epicene forms) are consistent with the recommendations of the Office québécois de la langue française, despite the informal context. As my results show a set of alternative overlapping agreement systems, I propose that this heterogeneity is one of the characteristic features of inclusive French.","PeriodicalId":442006,"journal":{"name":"Toronto Working Papers in Linguistics","volume":"58 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Toronto Working Papers in Linguistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33137/twpl.v43i1.35953","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper looks at the variation of typographical procedures and agreements related to inclusive French (FI) on the microblogging system Twitter in Canada. The corpus used includes 464 tweets geo-localized in Montreal, Ottawa and Quebec and published on May 12th, 2020. They were sorted into cases of simple inclusion (IS), uniform agreement (AU) and mixed agreement (AM). The results showed that IS (57%) is the most preferred approach. When the tweets presented more than one FI mark, the preferred structure was AM (27%). When compared to the 15% of AU cases, we might conclude that uniform agreement is not common in this corpus. The analysis of AM tokens showed a gradual decrease in agreement marks throughout a given tweet. The preferred FI typographical procedures in this corpus (complete doublets, abbreviated doublets with parentheses, and epicene forms) are consistent with the recommendations of the Office québécois de la langue française, despite the informal context. As my results show a set of alternative overlapping agreement systems, I propose that this heterogeneity is one of the characteristic features of inclusive French.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
加拿大包容性法语在推特日·全球之声
本文着眼于加拿大微博系统Twitter上与包容性法语(FI)相关的排版程序和协议的变化。使用的语料库包括464条在蒙特利尔、渥太华和魁北克进行地理定位的推文,发布于2020年5月12日。将其分为简单包含(IS)、一致一致(AU)和混合一致(AM)。结果显示,IS(57%)是最受欢迎的方法。当tweet呈现多个FI标记时,首选结构是AM(27%)。与15%的AU病例相比,我们可以得出结论,统一协议在该语料库中并不常见。对AM代币的分析显示,在给定的推文中,协议标记逐渐减少。本语料库中首选的国际文书组织排印程序(完整的双字、带括号的缩写双字和双字格式)与法定文员办公室的建议是一致的,尽管背景是非正式的。由于我的研究结果显示了一组可选择的重叠协议系统,我认为这种异质性是包容性法语的特征之一。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
On the left periphery of the Kirundi noun phrase Spelling out the Kirundi augment morphosyntax of causatives and applicatives in Tshiluba Getting the -ik: An anticausative structure in Kirundi Noun Class and Classification in Tshiluba (L.31)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1